Forum Reply - JCO Consulting Services


Home	Free Stuff	Graphics	Programming Services	Contact Us	Ford Stuff

Skip Navigation Links

Original Message

1964 390 questions

By mrb - 07/06/2001 8:22:34 PM; IP 208.29.73.26

I was wondering if a 1964 390 would be a good basis for CJ heads or aftermarket, CJ cam or similar, if there is anything peculiar about the 1964 that cause problems, and whether or not the stock automatics they used then,which is NOT a C-6, would have problems with the added heat.
thanks

This thread, so far...

Skip Navigation Links.

Collapse <b>1964 390 questions</b> -- <font color=#0000ff>mrb, <i>07/06/2001</i></font>

1964 390 questions -- mrb, 07/06/2001

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=7154&Reply=7151><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor7154" onclick="return false;">Stock heads are better than the CJ heads.</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>Dave Shoe, <i>07/07/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=7154',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor7154')
});
</script>

Stock heads are better than the CJ heads. -- Dave Shoe, 07/07/2001

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=7158&Reply=7151><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor7158" onclick="return false;">RE: Stock heads are better than the CJ heads.Shoe.</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>mrb, <i>07/07/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=7158',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor7158')
});
</script>

RE: Stock heads are better than the CJ heads.Shoe. -- mrb, 07/07/2001

RE: Stock heads are better than the CJ heads.Shoe. -- Dave Shoe, 07/07/2001

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=7181&Reply=7151><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor7181" onclick="return false;">RE: Stock heads are better than the CJ heads.</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>Randall Horn, <i>07/10/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=7181',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor7181')
});
</script>

RE: Stock heads are better than the CJ heads. -- Randall Horn, 07/10/2001

Casting variances. -- Dave Shoe, 07/10/2001

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=7182&Reply=7151><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor7182" onclick="return false;">RE: Stock heads are better than the CJ heads.SHOE</a> -- <font color=#0000ff> Robert, <i>07/10/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=7182',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor7182')
});
</script>

RE: Stock heads are better than the CJ heads.SHOE -- Robert, 07/10/2001

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=7184&Reply=7151><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor7184" onclick="return false;">I haven't looked lately.</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>Dave Shoe, <i>07/10/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=7184',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor7184')
});
</script>

I haven't looked lately. -- Dave Shoe, 07/10/2001

RE: I haven't looked lately. -- Robert, 07/13/2001

RE: 1964 390 questions -- Eric, 07/12/2001