Forum Reply - JCO Consulting Services


Home	Free Stuff	Graphics	Programming Services	Contact Us	Ford Stuff

Original Message

RE:High performance Fords

By Mike McQuesten - 09/05/2001 4:25:33 PM; IP 206.193.0.124

I do agree with you Mel about those engines being part of the heritage of the FE. What I was trying to say is that the 352 Y code of '60 should probably be on the list of engines/codes that this site manages. It's not a big deal. I know exactly what a 352HP/360 engine is and so it shouldn't matter to me. And what I mean by first true HP FE is that the 1960 Ford HP option really was the start of FoMoCo's return to high(total)performance. They'd played by the rules and it hurt 'em. They came back in '60 with a package that was done very well. It was a total package not just a large or hotter engine plopped into a standard assembly line passenger car. When you bought a 352HP for a whopping $160 you got a fully integrated package from rear end, suspension, wheels/tire/brakes and drivetrain. They didn't build many of them. They were all built with a DSO of PAO which was the way police cars were built too..when production line time was available.

This thread, so far...

Skip Navigation Links.

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=7976&Reply=7976><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor7976" onclick="return false;">M code?</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>Mike McQuesten, <i>09/04/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=7976',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor7976')
});
</script>

M code? -- Mike McQuesten, 09/04/2001

RE:Clark not Walker! -- Mike McQuesten, 09/04/2001

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=7982&Reply=7976><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor7982" onclick="return false;">So far I see no 'M' engine for 1964, Ford or L-M. [n/m]</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>Mr F, <i>09/04/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=7982',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor7982')
});
</script>

So far I see no 'M' engine for 1964, Ford or L-M. [n/m] -- Mr F, 09/04/2001

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=7985&Reply=7976><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor7985" onclick="return false;">RE:Yes indeed..</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>Mike McQuesten, <i>09/04/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=7985',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor7985')
});
</script>

RE:Yes indeed.. -- Mike McQuesten, 09/04/2001

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=7990&Reply=7976><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor7990" onclick="return false;">RE:High performance Fords</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>Mel, <i>09/04/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=7990',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor7990')
});
</script>

RE:High performance Fords -- Mel, 09/04/2001

RE:High performance Fords -- Mike McQuesten, 09/05/2001