Original Message
RE: top loader
By Mel Clark - 09/17/2001 2:40:31 AM; IP 64.12.101.151
Don't use the 289/302 trans if you are not willing to shorten the pilot portion of the input shaft. I've already tried the spacer method and there are several reasons not to. First there is the less than secure mount, the sleeve that supports the throw out bearing needs to seat in the bell housing, then there is the matter of the throw out bearing possibly hanging on the end of the sleeve and next, the splines of the input shaft should be fully through the clutch disc which may not happen using spacers. The RUG C2 is a close ratio trans and is very good but, it works best for highway use or with 4.10 or better gearing otherwise I suggest using the wide ratio that you have.
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=8139&Reply=8139><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor8139" onclick="return false;">top loader question</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>stephen, <i>09/15/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=8139',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor8139')
});
</script>
 top loader question -- stephen, 09/15/2001
 RE: top loader question -- richard, 09/15/2001
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=8157&Reply=8139><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor8157" onclick="return false;">RE: top loader question</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Mel Clark, <i>09/16/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=8157',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor8157')
});
</script>
 RE: top loader question -- Mel Clark, 09/16/2001
 RE: top loader question -- Travis Miller, 09/16/2001
 RE: top loader question -- mike, 09/16/2001
RE: top loader -- Mel Clark, 09/17/2001
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 2024164553 in the box