These are the old FoMoCo Obsolete Forums and are being hosted by JCOConsulting.com. While you're here, check out my articles or have a look around at some of the Ford Stuff we have for sale. You might find something you can't live without.

Skip Navigation Links.
 Oilpans -- Ian Dobson, 03/22/2004
So I was looking at the Canton Road race low profile pan and the Miloden Road race pans and was wonderig which one would be better, or I guess more to teh point fit my car, I'm open to other suggestions too, these are just the only one that I have found, and ground clearence is what I don't want to sacrifice ans my stock pan has a few dents in the bottom of it..

I have a 69 Mustang with FPA headers, I am considering going to rack and pinion in the future, does anyone know if these pans will fit?

On another note, I'm looking for a "quiet" electric fuel pump, the one I have sounds like someone is in the trunk with a jack hammer :(

Any recomendations on that one too?
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20787&Reply=20787><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>fe driveline</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>matt bailey, <i>03/22/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>im new at fe  drivelines need to know what trans will work in a 65 galaxie with a 352 engine<br> </blockquote> fe driveline -- matt bailey, 03/22/2004
im new at fe drivelines need to know what trans will work in a 65 galaxie with a 352 engine
 Standard or Auto? -- Ted, 03/22/2004
n/m
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20783&Reply=20783><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>wiring</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>jim shaver, <i>03/21/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>ok im gonna rewire the 68... anyone know where i can get a stock harness or am i beter off making my own?<br> </blockquote> wiring -- jim shaver, 03/21/2004
ok im gonna rewire the 68... anyone know where i can get a stock harness or am i beter off making my own?
 RE: wiring -- jim shaver, 03/21/2004
well said screw it and am making my own been at it about 8 hours so far and goin cross eyed tryin to follow it hehe
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20796&Reply=20783><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: wiring</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Dano, <i>03/22/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>If it is a Mustang you can order new harnesses through places like the Paddock.  I just installed a new firewall to solenoid harness on my 69 Mustang and it was perfect. It works great.  Everything fit and looks just like the factory harness, except for all the frayed and cracked  wires that were on the 35 year old original. </blockquote> RE: wiring -- Dano, 03/22/2004
If it is a Mustang you can order new harnesses through places like the Paddock. I just installed a new firewall to solenoid harness on my 69 Mustang and it was perfect. It works great. Everything fit and looks just like the factory harness, except for all the frayed and cracked wires that were on the 35 year old original.
 RE: wiring -- jim shaver, 03/22/2004
yeah thinkin im gonna do that... worth the price if its that much of a pain already and nowhere near done
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20782&Reply=20782><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>I'm sure most of you . . .</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Orin, <i>03/21/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote> . . . have seen this but I was shocked by the price of it.<br>   Also, do those numbers and letters in the lifter valley mean?  Just curious.<br><br><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2467728071&category=34202">http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2467728071&category=34202</a> </blockquote> I'm sure most of you . . . -- Orin, 03/21/2004
. . . have seen this but I was shocked by the price of it.
Also, do those numbers and letters in the lifter valley mean? Just curious.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2467728071&category=34202
 Bore size -- Royce, 03/21/2004
I don't have the list in front of me but those letters / numbers in the valley are bore "grades". They told the assemblers which size piston to install in each bore for optimum fit.

Royce

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20775&Reply=20775><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>shock towers</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>jim shaver, <i>03/19/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>hey changina a 68 from a 200 L6 to a 360 V8... will i need to change shock towers or will it fit as is?<br> </blockquote> shock towers -- jim shaver, 03/19/2004
hey changina a 68 from a 200 L6 to a 360 V8... will i need to change shock towers or will it fit as is?
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20778&Reply=20775><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: shock towers</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>McQ, <i>03/19/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>Not a lot of information being provided to us here but I'll get the ball rolling for you jim.  You must be referring to a unibody '68 something - Torino, Fairlane, Mustang, etc.   So will you need to change shock towers to fit an FE where an inline 200" six-popper was?<br><br>The answer is - Nope.  You'll just need lots of other stuff which I'm sure you must have for the 360FE. <br><br>You must know that a factory 200" car was factory equipped with a lot of light weight equipment to match the power of that six.  Things like brakes, tranny, differential.  All kinds of important things need to be changed to create an acceptable - safe environment for the power of an FE.<br><br>You've got all of that taken care of don't you? </blockquote> RE: shock towers -- McQ, 03/19/2004
Not a lot of information being provided to us here but I'll get the ball rolling for you jim. You must be referring to a unibody '68 something - Torino, Fairlane, Mustang, etc. So will you need to change shock towers to fit an FE where an inline 200" six-popper was?

The answer is - Nope. You'll just need lots of other stuff which I'm sure you must have for the 360FE.

You must know that a factory 200" car was factory equipped with a lot of light weight equipment to match the power of that six. Things like brakes, tranny, differential. All kinds of important things need to be changed to create an acceptable - safe environment for the power of an FE.

You've got all of that taken care of don't you?
 RE: shock towers -- jim shaver, 03/19/2004
long way to go just started basically ... i thought i put that it was a mustang... i was standin there lookin after engine was gone and wondered bout it
most brake work is being put in new... gonna try to find a toploader for it, wanna get a 9 " if i can too
so thank you you answered the big question hehe
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20765&Reply=20765><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>what carb to use??</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>galaxiefreak64, <i>03/19/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>should i use a 750 double pumper or the 750 elbrock proformer? its used on a 390 that has a mild cam. its in a 64 galaxie. any other suggestions would help, but i have narrioied it down to those double pumper or a proformer,  but i would like to keep the stock 4v intake. </blockquote> what carb to use?? -- galaxiefreak64, 03/19/2004
should i use a 750 double pumper or the 750 elbrock proformer? its used on a 390 that has a mild cam. its in a 64 galaxie. any other suggestions would help, but i have narrioied it down to those double pumper or a proformer, but i would like to keep the stock 4v intake.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20767&Reply=20765><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: what carb to use??</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>giacamo, <i>03/19/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>with a stock intake i,d back off my carb by 100 cfm. </blockquote> RE: what carb to use?? -- giacamo, 03/19/2004
with a stock intake i,d back off my carb by 100 cfm.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20768&Reply=20765><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: what carb to use??</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>galaxiefreak64, <i>03/19/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>so the doulbe pumper or proformer? </blockquote> RE: what carb to use?? -- galaxiefreak64, 03/19/2004
so the doulbe pumper or proformer?
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20769&Reply=20765><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: what carb to use??</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>giacamo, <i>03/19/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>i,d use the doulbe pumper even though it may need a littel tweaking  </blockquote> RE: what carb to use?? -- giacamo, 03/19/2004
i,d use the doulbe pumper even though it may need a littel tweaking
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20771&Reply=20765><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: what carb to use??</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>galaxiefreak64, <i>03/19/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>ok<br>so is it easily to tune, my dad has been working on old fords for about 30 years. but i really want to do it myself. if i buy it new will it have some instuctions on basic stuff?? </blockquote> RE: what carb to use?? -- galaxiefreak64, 03/19/2004
ok
so is it easily to tune, my dad has been working on old fords for about 30 years. but i really want to do it myself. if i buy it new will it have some instuctions on basic stuff??
 RE: what carb to use?? -- giacamo, 03/19/2004
i think thear easy you can adjust the pump rate jets ect, most have the tuning instructions with them.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20772&Reply=20765><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: what carb to use??</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>giacamo, <i>03/19/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>if you don,t have headers and electronic ing. i,d think about a 600 cfm double pumper i like the double pumpers i feal with a littel tweaking thay will out preform the AFB carter preformer type carb........ </blockquote> RE: what carb to use?? -- giacamo, 03/19/2004
if you don,t have headers and electronic ing. i,d think about a 600 cfm double pumper i like the double pumpers i feal with a littel tweaking thay will out preform the AFB carter preformer type carb........
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20773&Reply=20765><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: what carb to use??</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>galaxiefreak64, <i>03/19/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>oh ok thanks </blockquote> RE: what carb to use?? -- galaxiefreak64, 03/19/2004
oh ok thanks
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20777&Reply=20765><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE:a different opinion</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>McQ, <i>03/19/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>A stock '64 intake on a 390 with a mild cam in a '64 Galaxie and you want to tune it yourself?<br><br>I'm not going to try to be a know-it-all but I just have to say that I think any Holley double pumper here is not the right choice.<br><br>I have used a lot of Holleys on FEs.  There have been great ones and there have been problems.  I have also used four different AFBs/Edelbrock Performer carbs.  They have all worked perfectly and were reasonably easy to fine tune.<br><br>One app was on a 390, Performer intake, HP352 exhaust manifolds, electronic ignition, mild hydraulic cam all topped off with a 600 cfm Edelbrock carb.  I bought E'brock's "Strip Kit" box of jets, step-up springs and metering rods.  I used their little booklet that came in the box with the carb.  There was a slight hesitation accelerating off idle. This was with the carb bolted on out of the box.   I made some adjustments, i.e., primary jets, step-up springs, metering rods.  The process took minutes and there was no gasoline leakage/spillage making these adjustments.  I also added E'brock's kickdown lever since I was running a kickdown rod from the trans.  This was in a F100 pickup.  That carb worked perfectly without a single problem.<br><br>I had a similar experience with a 750 cfm, manual choke, on a 428 CJ.  Again,  all went perfectly.  And in this particular instance the E'brock 750 matched the CJ Holley 735 in performance - not just seat-o-the-pants but actual drag strip E.T.s and mph.<br><br>I personally can't see  a double-pumper on a mild 390.<br><br> </blockquote> RE:a different opinion -- McQ, 03/19/2004
A stock '64 intake on a 390 with a mild cam in a '64 Galaxie and you want to tune it yourself?

I'm not going to try to be a know-it-all but I just have to say that I think any Holley double pumper here is not the right choice.

I have used a lot of Holleys on FEs. There have been great ones and there have been problems. I have also used four different AFBs/Edelbrock Performer carbs. They have all worked perfectly and were reasonably easy to fine tune.

One app was on a 390, Performer intake, HP352 exhaust manifolds, electronic ignition, mild hydraulic cam all topped off with a 600 cfm Edelbrock carb. I bought E'brock's "Strip Kit" box of jets, step-up springs and metering rods. I used their little booklet that came in the box with the carb. There was a slight hesitation accelerating off idle. This was with the carb bolted on out of the box. I made some adjustments, i.e., primary jets, step-up springs, metering rods. The process took minutes and there was no gasoline leakage/spillage making these adjustments. I also added E'brock's kickdown lever since I was running a kickdown rod from the trans. This was in a F100 pickup. That carb worked perfectly without a single problem.

I had a similar experience with a 750 cfm, manual choke, on a 428 CJ. Again, all went perfectly. And in this particular instance the E'brock 750 matched the CJ Holley 735 in performance - not just seat-o-the-pants but actual drag strip E.T.s and mph.

I personally can't see a double-pumper on a mild 390.

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20780&Reply=20765><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE:a different opinion</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>galaxiefreak64, <i>03/20/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>well i was thinking about the proformer carb becuse i see a LOT of the around here. so ill just buy the proformer and put a doulble on my 406. </blockquote> RE:a different opinion -- galaxiefreak64, 03/20/2004
well i was thinking about the proformer carb becuse i see a LOT of the around here. so ill just buy the proformer and put a doulble on my 406.
 RE:there you go -- McQ, 03/20/2004
That makes more sense to me. The 650 Double Pumper may work very well on a 406.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20753&Reply=20753><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>water in oil</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>mike, <i>03/18/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>I have a 69 mach1 that has a rebuilt 390 in it.It has less than 500 miles on it.I have parked it for the winter( I live in Alaska).Today the temp is at 35 so I though I would change the oil before starting the car.Took the drain plug out,nothing comes out.Its frozen.Heat up the oil pan and water comes out,at least 4-5 ozs. of clear water.Is this condensation or do I have real serious trouble here.This is the first oil change since the rebuild. </blockquote> water in oil -- mike, 03/18/2004
I have a 69 mach1 that has a rebuilt 390 in it.It has less than 500 miles on it.I have parked it for the winter( I live in Alaska).Today the temp is at 35 so I though I would change the oil before starting the car.Took the drain plug out,nothing comes out.Its frozen.Heat up the oil pan and water comes out,at least 4-5 ozs. of clear water.Is this condensation or do I have real serious trouble here.This is the first oil change since the rebuild.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20757&Reply=20753><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: water in oil</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>mike, <i>03/19/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>Thinking more about it it was more like 1-2 ozs of water and the oil was changed after it was first started. </blockquote> RE: water in oil -- mike, 03/19/2004
Thinking more about it it was more like 1-2 ozs of water and the oil was changed after it was first started.
 RE: water in oil -- greg, 03/19/2004
That little I would think would be condensation, but you wont know for sure until you start the motor. Happens to my boat here in sunny socal, I think because it's under a cover and after a few good rains condesation manages to get everywhere, I'm actually surprised at how much ends up in the motor.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20761&Reply=20753><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: water in oil</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Gary Adam, <i>03/19/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>Mike,<br>  I also live in a cold climate.(Alberta, Canada) I know that if <br>you start a vehicle when its cold outside,<br>and especially when there is high humidity in <br>the air, you will get high condensation in the engine. If you do not warm the engine fully<br>up, the condensation will eventually find its <br>way into the pan, and in approx. the quantity<br>that you have found. By warming the engine<br>fully up, and then some, the condensation<br>should evaporate. A cold thermostat will<br>aggravate the problem even worse. No t-stat,<br>worse yet. More colds starts and shut-offs will<br>keep adding more water. This problem will<br>also rot out your exhaust real fast as the water<br>collects in the pipes/mufflers. Some say that<br>is why you should change oil in fall and in spring - to minimize condensation. Hope this <br>helps. </blockquote> RE: water in oil -- Gary Adam, 03/19/2004
Mike,
I also live in a cold climate.(Alberta, Canada) I know that if
you start a vehicle when its cold outside,
and especially when there is high humidity in
the air, you will get high condensation in the engine. If you do not warm the engine fully
up, the condensation will eventually find its
way into the pan, and in approx. the quantity
that you have found. By warming the engine
fully up, and then some, the condensation
should evaporate. A cold thermostat will
aggravate the problem even worse. No t-stat,
worse yet. More colds starts and shut-offs will
keep adding more water. This problem will
also rot out your exhaust real fast as the water
collects in the pipes/mufflers. Some say that
is why you should change oil in fall and in spring - to minimize condensation. Hope this
helps.
 Definitely condensation. -- Dave Shoe, 03/19/2004
Since it was clear water, it has to be condensation, either from normal crankcase blowby condensing at it hits the cool surfaces, or from the atmosphere condensing like the early morning dew (if stored outside). It's not coolant, since there is no antifreeze visible.

I find this to be a problem in Minnesota, and the engine needs to be warmed up and driven for at leat 10 minutes after getting warm to start removing excess water from the oil. Simply getting the heater to pump hot air is not long enough to start drying the oil.

JMO,
Shoe.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20764&Reply=20753><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: water in oil</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>mike, <i>03/19/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>Thanks for all the replies to the water problem.Im not running a thermostat in the car due to it being hot and I know that probably has something to do with it.I will put one in now once its back on the road again. </blockquote> RE: water in oil -- mike, 03/19/2004
Thanks for all the replies to the water problem.Im not running a thermostat in the car due to it being hot and I know that probably has something to do with it.I will put one in now once its back on the road again.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20766&Reply=20753><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: water in oil</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Gary Adam, <i>03/19/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>One more thing Mike. I was told that for every<br>gallon of gas burned, you create I think it was<br>the equivilent of 2 gallons of water vapour. So<br>even if this is only half true, that's still a lot of<br>vapour created. So like Dave says, if this gets<br>into your engine via blow-by, or even a small<br>portion gets into the engine by blow-by, its not<br>hard to see you collecting condensation,<br>especially with no thermostat. <br> Has anyone else heard of this gasoline to <br>water vapour formula/ratio? </blockquote> RE: water in oil -- Gary Adam, 03/19/2004
One more thing Mike. I was told that for every
gallon of gas burned, you create I think it was
the equivilent of 2 gallons of water vapour. So
even if this is only half true, that's still a lot of
vapour created. So like Dave says, if this gets
into your engine via blow-by, or even a small
portion gets into the engine by blow-by, its not
hard to see you collecting condensation,
especially with no thermostat.
Has anyone else heard of this gasoline to
water vapour formula/ratio?
 Just over a gallon. -- Dave Shoe, 03/19/2004
For every gallon of gasoline burned, you create a bit more than a gallon of liquid water.

Using the formula:

2*C8H18 + 25*O2 => 18*H2O + 16*CO2

...you find 228 grams of gasoline creates about 324 grams of water.

(I hope the symbols I selected didn't become some kind of HTML coding that makes the formula unreadable)

Shoe.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20750&Reply=20750><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Hard to hot start 390 w/MSD-6AL</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Bill, <i>03/18/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>I just installed a MSD-6AL on my 69 390 GT. It runs great, but is hard to start when warmed up. B4 the MSD, I had a Pertronix w/no thermostat, then I added the MSD and a 190deg thermostat. Now it runs warmer (75% on gauge), but is VERY difficult to start when warm. Timing is around 6deg BTDC.<br><br>Any ideas?<br><br>Thanks, Bill </blockquote> Hard to hot start 390 w/MSD-6AL -- Bill, 03/18/2004
I just installed a MSD-6AL on my 69 390 GT. It runs great, but is hard to start when warmed up. B4 the MSD, I had a Pertronix w/no thermostat, then I added the MSD and a 190deg thermostat. Now it runs warmer (75% on gauge), but is VERY difficult to start when warm. Timing is around 6deg BTDC.

Any ideas?

Thanks, Bill
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20751&Reply=20750><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: Hard to hot start 390 w/MSD-6AL</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>DangerousDave, <i>03/18/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>Bill, The MSD produces multiple sparks in the low RPM range and should fire that engine right up, are you running headers? some headers on FE applications run so close the starter it gets heat soaked and draws the voltage way down during cranking, the MSD is a great unit but it is voltage sensitive, make sure you have chosen a good spot to tap the heavy positive feed to the box, and the voltage on that wire does not drop too much, other than that check the basics  timming and distibutor phasing. Good Luck </blockquote> RE: Hard to hot start 390 w/MSD-6AL -- DangerousDave, 03/18/2004
Bill, The MSD produces multiple sparks in the low RPM range and should fire that engine right up, are you running headers? some headers on FE applications run so close the starter it gets heat soaked and draws the voltage way down during cranking, the MSD is a great unit but it is voltage sensitive, make sure you have chosen a good spot to tap the heavy positive feed to the box, and the voltage on that wire does not drop too much, other than that check the basics timming and distibutor phasing. Good Luck
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20755&Reply=20750><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: Hard to hot start 390 w/MSD-6AL</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Bill, <i>03/19/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>Thanks, Dave. I'll check the voltage under load... </blockquote> RE: Hard to hot start 390 w/MSD-6AL -- Bill, 03/19/2004
Thanks, Dave. I'll check the voltage under load...
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20763&Reply=20750><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Slow cranking or no fire?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Dave Shoe, <i>03/19/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>What do you mean by "hard to start".  I can't picture your particular scenario without a more colorful description of how the engine is acting.<br><br>Shoe. </blockquote> Slow cranking or no fire? -- Dave Shoe, 03/19/2004
What do you mean by "hard to start". I can't picture your particular scenario without a more colorful description of how the engine is acting.

Shoe.
 RE: Slow cranking or no fire? -- Bill, 03/19/2004
Basically it would'nt start until it cooled down...

Breaking news- I took Dave's suggestion about low voltage; seems that was the problem, I bypassed the MSD and it works great. So the lesson is to locate the wires/gauge size EXACTLY like MSD says: bigger is (almost) always better!

Thanks,
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20745&Reply=20745><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Clutch release fork ball</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Dano, <i>03/18/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>I have a Lakewood bellhousing and I need to get the correct clutch fork release ball, It looks like they come in three sizes for a Mustang. 1.4", 2.317", and 2.640".  It is going in a 69 Mustang with 390,  and 428 style toploader 4 speed transmission, using a stock style fork. Does anyone know which ball I should be using? </blockquote> Clutch release fork ball -- Dano, 03/18/2004
I have a Lakewood bellhousing and I need to get the correct clutch fork release ball, It looks like they come in three sizes for a Mustang. 1.4", 2.317", and 2.640". It is going in a 69 Mustang with 390, and 428 style toploader 4 speed transmission, using a stock style fork. Does anyone know which ball I should be using?
 RE: Clutch release fork ball -- Charlie, 03/19/2004
I used the complete clutch set up from a 67 gt mustang with 390 in my last 390 conversion. as long as you dajust your clutch on installation as you waould any factory set up any should work fine.

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20738&Reply=20738><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>What Carb to use??</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Mike, <i>03/17/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>What carb to use on a warmed up 390? i have a 1969 Cougar Convertible with the following mods to the engine:<br><br>9.5 pistons<br>FPA headers<br>balanced<br>Exhaust porting and stainless steel valves<br>latest performer intake<br>Comp cam lift is 487 int 493 exh<br>duration @.050  212 int  219 exh<br>stock dist thats been recurved etc.<br><br>So should it be a Holley 600 or 735.<br><br>thanks for your input<br> </blockquote> What Carb to use?? -- Mike, 03/17/2004
What carb to use on a warmed up 390? i have a 1969 Cougar Convertible with the following mods to the engine:

9.5 pistons
FPA headers
balanced
Exhaust porting and stainless steel valves
latest performer intake
Comp cam lift is 487 int 493 exh
duration @.050 212 int 219 exh
stock dist thats been recurved etc.

So should it be a Holley 600 or 735.

thanks for your input
 RE: What Carb to use?? -- giacamo, 03/18/2004
650 holley
 RE: What Carb to use?? -- McQ, 03/19/2004
giacamo's recommendation of a 650 cfm Holley is certainly reasonable. But if you have access to a 600 Holley, specifically a '66-'68 390GT Holley 600, I'd recommend that carb. You mention that you're running the E'brock Performer which has an RPM range that is limited to 5,500 on the high side. So again, giacomo's rec seems even better with the mild performances improvements you've mentioned. It's just that a 390GT Holley 600 cfm carb is kinda cool to run.
Go to the top of this page
Go back one page Back    Next Go forward one page

121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140