Skip Navigation Links.
| does it have a 9"? vin? -- jim shaver, 03/14/2004
can anyone tell me by vin if my 68 mustang has a 9 " rear end or not? |
| | RE: does it have a 9"? vin? -- raycfe, 03/14/2004
Easy thing to check by looking at the front of the rear axle assy. 8 and 9 inch rear ends have removable gear carriers. If you can put a 9/16th socket with a 6 inch ext straight on the bottom 2 bolts for this carrier, it should be a 8.A 9 would need a flex socket. |
| | | RE: does it have a 9"? vin? -- jim shaver, 03/14/2004
thanks ray ill check it i take it thats a normal socket not deepwell? |
| | RE: does it have a 9"? vin? -- Barry McLarty, 03/14/2004
All 68 mustangs had the 8" rear,unless they had a 390 or 428. |
| | A.C. you should come down under.... -- pop428, 03/14/2004
This is all the rage down here. A Mate Of mine goes to all the swap meets with Tappet covers and hubcaps and yes he has just started doing timing covers filled with clocks...:^o
I have to admit.... I do have an FE Tappet cover with a barometer and clock in it> :^)
Peter. 9R02R..... WT 7034 Green. |
| alternator harness part # id -- blake fensler, 03/13/2004
i have run across a nos alt wire harness that is still in the box. i'm tyring to see if it fits the f100 trucks or the bronco's. the part # is: d0tz-14305-x, if anyone has a mpc to look it up that would be fantastic. thanks a bunch... |
| | It's not Bronco, so it must be... -- Dan Davis, 03/15/2004
...some F-Series truck. I do not have a truck MPC (Bronco is in the car MPC), so I cannot say what model, light duty or heavy duty.
Cheers, Dan |
| c4ae-g heads -- Ryan Hodges, 03/12/2004
I have a set of c4ae-g heads on my truck. Are they good flowing heads, or just plain jane average ones?
Thanks for the info |
| | RE: c4ae-g heads -- giacamo, 03/13/2004
is that a o or a c4ae c 4ae, if c 4ae 1964 heads big ports on the intake side i like to use the pre 65 intakes that have the same size ports i, like them i use them on the hotter projects thay have a 500 to 1000 rpm edge over 1965 and newer non hp heads.......with the smaller ports.i try to save all the pre 65 stuf i can find,,,, |
| | RE: c4ae-g heads -- Chuck Brandt, 03/13/2004
They are a common but decent head that will accept CJ size valves. They and the C6AE-R can be made into "poor mans CJ" heads. I'd keep 'em too.
Chuck |
| Anybody use the 270H comp cam? -- Steve M, 03/12/2004
I just called comp cams and they suggested this cam for my car. It is the 270H
RPM range 1800-5800 Adv Duration 270 intake and 270 exhaust
@.050 intake 224 exhaust 224
Valve lift .519 intake and .519 exhaust with 110 degree lobe separation.
Just curious if this is a good cam? It is for a daily driver 390 with a couple of trips to the track each year. I asked him if I could use the stock springs and pushrods with this cam and he said yes. Does anybody think that lift is too high for the stock rods and springs? |
| | Also I have the stock stall convertor is that ok -- Steve M, 03/12/2004
Stock convertor is what I plan on keeping. The build is basic. 390 with headers and performer manifold and holley 650. I am looking for a cam that will give me more torque because I dont want to go over 5000-5500 rpms. The rear end gear is a 390 something. So I would like to know if this 270H will make it snappier and not slower than it is now, or should I go to a milder cam from 800 rpm to 5500 area. |
| | RE: Anybody use the 270H comp cam? -- giacamo, 03/12/2004
is your car a mustang or a heavey weight ltd ect i,d use better springs than stock.and better pushrods .and the one pice retainers .i like comp cams thear cams work. |
| | | Unfortunately it is a heavyweight. It is a -- Steve M, 03/12/2004
It is a 67 Galaxie. I didnt know if this was going to be too much cam for the motor or if I should find something smaller. |
| | | | You need the Comp Cams spring kit too. -- Royce P, 03/12/2004
You can't expect thirty year old valve springs to be any good. Get the ones that Comp recommends for that cam.
I have run that cam in several FE's. It is a great cam for a stock torque converter, about the most cam that can be run with one. Makes massive amounts of low and mid range torque.
Royce |
| | | | | RE: You need the Comp Cams spring kit too. -- Steve M, 03/12/2004
I was thinking about the spring issue and you are right. I dont know why I thought of putting all of this work into it only to have to tear it down again if I get a little crazy with the throttle. |
| | | | | | RE: You need the Comp Cams spring kit too. -- giacamo, 03/12/2004
steve on the heads i,d have hard seats instaled for the exaust valves and gides make shure the gides do not exstend past the casting into the exaust portes the hot exaust gasses will couse the gide to gauld to the valve runining your day i allways install seats in exaust i see alot of fe heads with erouded seats the gass wear i live seams hard on them and i see gides on exaust valves shot with less then 20000 miles on them becouse of the gides exposed in the exaust portes.....if you have a good shop dooing your head work thay can check your springs for the cam you chouse i check springs all the time dont hold your breath i rarely find a set i,d use...and if your going to run it hard one pice valve retainers are a must i,v sean tomany two pice stock ones break |
| | | | RE: Unfortunately it is a heavyweight. It is a -- giacamo, 03/12/2004
in a 67 gal i,d use a 265 comp cam i use this cam in pickup trucks and it works great in heavyweights.i,t has a choppy idel and comes of ided strong. |
| | | | | RE: Unfortunately it is a heavyweight. It is a -- Jim W, 03/13/2004
I also have a '67 with power brakes, but mine is a 4-speed. Would the 265DE be good for this application also? I have an Edelbrock F427 intake that is going on it I am still trying to decide on exhaust options.
Thanks,
Jim |
| | | | | | RE: Unfortunately it is a heavyweight. It is a -- giacamo, 03/13/2004
with a 4 spead 265 will work good with stock intake and stock duels. but with headers and alum intake and 350,s or lower gears and 4 spead i might lean to the 270 cam........i use the 265 in pickups and heavy weights daily drivers everyone loves the way the 265 pulls of idel with a automatic trans.... |
| | | | | | | What is the advantages between the 265 & 270? -- Steve M, 03/14/2004
Is the difference between the 265 and the 270 just a matter of where the power kicks in? Or is it something new? I am still trying to learn all I can about cams. |
| | | | | | | | Very little difference. -- Royce P, 03/14/2004
The 270 will have a bit more on top end. These two are so close that the difference might not even be noticeable from one to the other.
Royce |
| | | | | | | | RE: What is the advantages between the 265 & 270? -- giacamo, 03/14/2004
in a mustang lighter car thear is not much diferance but in a heavy weight or truck that you might tow with the split lift 265 has more balls for pulling hills trailers ect and with a stock converter works better then the 270 the 270 seams to start making balls at 2000 rpm,s i,v used them both i feal the 265 comes of idel better with a stock converter and hi gears then the 270 my 2 cents....... |
| | | | | | | | | Does the idle sound good on both cams? -- Steve M, 03/16/2004
Or can you even tell there is an aftermarket cam by the exhaust noise? |
| | | | | | | | | | RE: Does the idle sound good on both cams? -- giacamo, 03/16/2004
both have the same tipe of idel i like the way thay sound i also like it loud with quiet exaust as any cam thay sound preaty tame.but you can tell it,s camed up.with thease cams |
| | | | | | | | | | | RE: Does the idle sound good on both cams? -- Steve M, 03/17/2004
Great. I know performance is the first goal, but I definitely want it to sound good too. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | RE: Does the idle sound good on both cams? -- Mike, 03/17/2004
FYI I just got a cam from Comp and this is the grind.
XE256H lift is 487/493 duration @.050 is 212/219
Idle is smooth and power is excellent. I also have a set of the FPA headers, latest performer intake 9.5 pistons,balanced and a tricked out distributor. This is in a 1969 Cougar Convertible
thanks |
| FE build-up for Winter of 04 -- Chad Zeilenga, 03/12/2004
Hey all, I haven't posted much on this message board since my stock 390 in my 66 Galaxie hasn't given me any problems. If everything goes right I am going to start planning an FE buildup for my 390 that I will drop into my 66 Galaxie XL. I have a rough idea of output and what I would like to have but don't have much experience with building engines (I'm only 22) and I know there are some very knowledgeable people on this board. I am looking for input into what combo's work well and what parts work well. So here is what I have so far:
I am looking at getting 500-550 HP at the flywheel which should make for a very nice street/strip motor. Used 390 block with up to a 0.030 overbore New Forged Steel 390 crank H-Beam Rods with ROSS or KB pistons Ported & polished aluminum heads with complete roller rocker setup aluminum intake Demon 750cfm carb electric water pump electric fuel pump electric cooling fan serpentine belt conversion I am unsure of cam specs but I am investigating those now. This is just a basic list I have now, but if anyone would like to give me some input and tips I would really appreciate it.
Chad Zeilenga 1966 Galaxie 500XL |
| | RE: FE build-up for Winter of 04 -- Travis Miller, 03/13/2004
What transmission and rearend gear ratio will you be putting behind this monster? |
| | | RE: FE build-up for Winter of 04 -- Chad Zeilenga, 03/15/2004
I am planning on a C-6 built up a little from a local shop and my 9" with ~3.50 gears. |
| | RE: FE build-up for Winter of 04 -- Barry McLarty, 03/14/2004
Save some money on the bottom end and use the cast crank.Cutting down a 391 crank is an expensive way to go.Magna flux and blueprint your stock rods and use ARP rod bolts.With a lite weight piston,and cast iron crank it will take a lot of power to hurt it,and it will turn6500+rpm.425 or 450 horse is a reasonable expectation for a streetable 390. |
| | RE: FE build-up for Winter of 04 -- Travis Miller, 03/15/2004
Good choice on tranny and rearend gear. Be sure to budget for both of them from the start. A lot of projects such as yours seem to run out of money with the engine and never get a good drivetrain behind it. Without a good gear like a 3.50 all the money you spend on the engine will seem wasted when it comes to performance. In other words, with the stock gear (2.75 or 3.00) the car will actually be slower in the bottom RPM range because of the higher torque range brought on by a larger cam and better flowing intake manifold. The 3.50 gear will get the engine up in the useable torque range quicker. Your car needs horsepower, strong tranny and a good gear to be a true performer. Leave out one of those items and the result is a disappointing ride. |
| | | RE: FE build-up for Winter of 04 -- DangerousDave, 03/18/2004
Chad, I would go a different route,I see a pretty hefty price tag associated with that parts list ,for that money a 390 with aluminum heads sounds cool, but the Galaxie is a BIG car, you are already in 428 price range even if you cant find CJ heads .....(.you can, just try.)...find a 66 428 with R heads put the big valves in and some bowl work, CJ intakes are $100 all day long and a good ignition and exhaust set-up = killer combo. The key is to know how to flush out the parts. Dont go Cobra Jet shopping just looking for an engine or parts, look for a used T-Bird or so and for $1500 and the extra effort score everything you need whats that the price of Edelbrock heads +shipping? A fresh .030 over 428 warmed up as described will spank the 390 and takes its lunch money, and as Travis suggested put the remaining cash into the rest of the car. |
| 28 or 31 spline -- Dano, 03/12/2004
How strong are the standard 28 spline 9" rearend axels in a 69 Mustang. Will they hold up ok with 450hp or so? The car has a open rearend in it now, and I will be putting a street locker into it, and am wondering if I should get a 31 spline diffrential and put new axels in also while I am at it. I would rather not since my budget is getting a bit out of hand, but I want to make sure they will hold up ok. |
| Galaxie 500 352FE -- bprewit, 03/11/2004
Hey I found a couple of galaxie 500's today. The first is pretty rough '65 4 door with auto tranny and 390. Does have a 9" rear and running engine so not too bad for $150. The second is a '64 Galaxie 500 2 door fastback 3spd, with factory air and a 352 4V for $250. The '64 is in damn good shape with the interior even being in excellent condition and a straight rust free body (west tx dosent cause for much rust) and all the glass and trim in great shape. There is a 4spd that goes with the two cars so figure shouldnt be too hard to drop the 390 and 4spd into the '64 and have a pretty sharp cruiser. Sound like a good deal on the two cars? |
| | RE: a great deal! -- McQ, 03/11/2004
Yes that's a fabulous deal! To find a '64 two-door with any FE and a factory stick shift is ...... I'm just kinda wordless. Only $250 ..... jump on it this deal. Don't procrastinate. |
| | | RE: a great deal! -- bprewit, 03/11/2004
I posted this message then went to hand over the cash, well as everything that seems too good to be true it was. He changed his mind on the '64 (BASTARD!) but cut me a deal and gave me the '65 for $50. So it wasnt a total loss but damn that '64 fastback was a damn cool lookin car to me. I will keep on him and see if he wont change his mind back to selling. |
| | RE: Galaxie 500 352FE -- giacamo, 03/12/2004
yes i,d by now. |
| Crane Roller cam -- Dano, 03/11/2004
Has anyone installed the Crane HR-220/332-2S-10 Roller cam? I am wondering if this cam can be used with power brakes. |
| | RE: Crane Roller cam -- McQ, 03/12/2004
Hey Dano it might be helpful if you included some specs with this cam.
You might also check the March 2004 issue of Mustangs and Fords. There's an article featuring a 428 rebuild where they've selected a Crane hydraulic roller part # 34HR00012 Grind # HR-210/294-2-12. This cam may be just one step milder than the one you're considering.
Hope this helps to get the ball rolling on some responses for you. |
| | | RE: Crane Roller cam -- Dano, 03/14/2004
McQ, Here are the specs @ .004 cam timing, lift intake = 584, exaust lift = 607. duration = 284 intake and 290 exaust. I am building my engine the same as the Hot Rod magazine article from Jan. 2003. They built a 390 using Edelbrock heads, this Crane Powermax cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake, about 9.8 compression and they got 450 hp @ 5600 rpm on pump gas. My engine will be exactly the same except using a Holley Street Avenger 770 carb vs Hot Rod's Edelbrock 800, and I am using the Erson rocker set up vs Hot Rod's stock adjustable rockers. I am wondering if this engine will have enough vacuum for power brakes. Any help would be greatly appreciated. |
| | | | RE: Crane Roller cam -- McQ, 03/14/2004
Not having run this cam I don't believe I should be offering opinionated advice without some basis in facts. Over the years there has been some posters-advisors who have run Crane Roller cams. That's why posting the specs my help get some advice.
I do remember that Hot Rod article from a year ago. It was great to see an FE being built in such a prestigous magazine. I'm going from memory but it seems that HR was attempting to build an FE in a reasonably mild/streetable configuration.
Have you talked directly with Crane on their tech line or even by e-mail? I know that the major cam grinders like Crane & Comp are very concerned about customer cam selection. I would advice you to phone or e-mail them explaining exactly what you're building. |
| | | | | RE: Crane Roller cam -- Dano, 03/15/2004
Thanks. |
| Electric Water Pump -- Chad Zeilenga, 03/11/2004
Is there anyone who offers an electric water pump for a FE?
Chad Zeilenga |
| | | The link -- Steve M, 03/11/2004
The link just went to the electric water pumps, when you get there, on the left, type in FE electric water pump and it will show you about 10 of them. |
|