Skip Navigation Links.
| 427 sc castings -- Ed O'Malley, 12/04/2005
Ok I am having a debate with a friend. I found a C5AE-A block complete motor actually and I say from the casting it is a 427 center oiler for a cobra. He says it is a truck engine, because there is a truck trans bolted to it. Now I say it doesn't matter it is still the same casting number and the block could have landed in a truck easily as well a cobra. What other markings or ways are there to identify this block.. Help |
| | Measure the bore -- raycfe, 12/04/2005
Std Bore is 4.230" for a 427 |
| 1969 428 cj -- Danny, 12/03/2005
I have a stock 428CJ. I installed a Holley 850 double pumper. I would like to put in a mild radical cam and performance intake manifold. I am not mechanically inclined. Is there a intake and cam that will fit without modifying anything else? |
| | RE: 1969 428 cj -- tommy walton, 12/04/2005
Man yeah. ive got an edelbrock performer 390 on mine. the cam in my motor.. i don't know honestly but i do know most of the major manufactures make them just for the 428 cj. |
| | | RE: 1969 428 cj -- JACK, 01/02/2006
How many horse power does a stock 428cj police interceptor have |
| | mild radical cam? -- Gerry Proctor, 12/13/2005
It's one or the other. The factory CJ cam (C6OZ) is a fairly decent cam. If you want more, then you should probably talk to a couple or three of the cam companies to get their expert recommendation.
It's hard to do better than the factory CJ intake. It's easy to do worse -like using a Performer 390. You could knock about 70lbs off the nose of the car by replacing the factory CJ intake with a factory PI or one of the Blue Thunder PI repros. The PI intake is the same as the CJ, except it is cast in aluminum. The only real equivalent, readily available intake is the Performer RPM. |
| | | RE: mild radical cam? -- Danny, 12/13/2005
I did end up ordering the Performer RPM. What is a PI. |
| | | | RE: Police intercepter. n/m -- Dave72, 12/13/2005
|
| | | | | RE: Police intercepter. n/m -- Joe, 12/17/2005
I have a comp cam and edelbrock heads. All I can say if you change anything that puts more stress on the rocker shaft you better upgrade the end supports with ones that support the end of the shaft or it will snap. Trust me I know :) |
| | | | | | RE: Police intercepter. n/m -- giacamo, 12/17/2005
i try to use the iron stands in any thing over stock aps..... |
| 67 Shelby Gauge wiring -- Kenn, 12/01/2005
Could someone tell me the correct way to wire up the under dash gauges on a 67 Shelby |
| | RE: 67 Shelby Gauge wiring -- Kenn, 12/02/2005
All set, Thanks |
| choke stove -- charlie, 12/01/2005
can anyone tell me anything about the choke stove on a 68 289? |
| | RE: choke stove -- Dano, 12/01/2005
The choke stove is is for heating the old style automatic choke caps. Heat from the choke stove (exaust manifold) is drawn through choke assembly through a small vacuum port in the carb. This heats the choke element in the choke cap up causing the choke to open as the engine heats up. I'm not sure but I think the 289's have two tubes that go to the passenger side exaust manifold. One tube hooks up to the threaded vacuum port on the carb, the other is a push on hose connection that connects to the top of the carb, this one is for pulling cold filtered air into the exaust manifold, heating it up and sending it over to the automatic choke. I have seen others with the choke stove located in the intake manifold exaust crossover port also. These parts are often rusted out and not connected. If you have them hooked up and working properly, these chokes work great. |
| 1955 f100 -- Ed Ensign, 12/01/2005
I think it is time to get off my _ss and start this project. I want to fit a more up-to-date chassis under my '55 F100. I have looked into after market chassis, and the suspension packages, and the steering boxes and the, and the etc. It adds up to $. I admit I am a novice at this and need the 411. Is there a later model car that I could start with to make things easier (and CHEAPER)?
I would like to end up with a power everything pickup that looks vintage but drives comfortably. Help. Ed E. |
| | RE: 1955 f100 -- Painter Wayne, 12/01/2005
There's a lot of ways you can modify the chassis and suspension on these trucks. They can be a lot of fun when they're done right, or be a miserable pile of crap and worth nothing if done wrong.
I've built several trucks for many people over the years, and by far the best, easiest, and in the big picture, cheapest way to do this is with a Mustang II front suspension crossmember kit. If you want to go low buck, get the basic kit, about $350, and find a donor 74-80 Pinto or 74-78 Mustang II front clip, available at the junk yard for about $150. This will give you a modern suspension design with rack and pinion steering and disc brakes, and have an excellent ride. With a 3500 pound truck, I'd recommend upgrading the front disc brakes to 10 or 11 inch, but the stock 9" rotors may get you by for a while. Also optional would be to install new bushings and ball joints in the control arms while you've got it apart. Modify your steering column or replace it with a fancy tilt unit and you're good to go up front.
At the rear, Chassis Engineering and probably several others make nice, comfortable leaf kits for just a few hundred dollars to compliment the front and level out the stance.
I highly discourage swapping entire frames from some unknown car. Width, length and wheelbase will have to be extensively modified, body mounts will need to be fabricated and body panels chopped up to pull off a deal like that. Reasle value on an abortion project like that will be nil.
Even grafting a camaro front clip the truck frame isn't a desirable way to go. It adds hundreds of pounds of dead weight to the front end, and again, major hacking of inner structure is required, not to mention ease of making a mistake in placement and having an ill-handling ride when done.
With a M-II crossmember kit, it includes detailed instructions, templates and all the parts you need ready to weld. Above all, the engineering is done to ensure your geometry is correct so you'll have a safe and comfortable driving truck when it's finished. They're realitively easy to install if you're mechanicly inclined at all, and the resale value will be there if you take your time and do a professional quality job.
Good Luck with your project and enjoy.
|
| | | RE: 1955 f100 -- David, 12/02/2005
my dad and i are rebuilding a 53 ford f-250 and we toke a 79 volare front end and with some templates we got from bobs F fun hundreds we had it in a few hours and it is nice because of the torsion bars instead of springs and it only cost like $100 for the front clip and the templates. we put in a 4 link but no limit make some kick ass suspension stuff. I have hundreds of books of stuff for these trucks. some of the book things I have (the name of the things are esacping me) but look up no limit, johns f-100, bobs f fun hundreds, LMC, Zigs that is some of them. Good luck, we have been working on ours for 8 years going on to 9 and it is almost done. |
| Ford FE 390 engine -- Jersey Guy, 11/30/2005
I'm looking for a tri-power set up for a 390 Fe Ford. It does NOT have to be original, Edelbrock, Offenhauser, Weiand, etc. Does anybode know who still makes a 3X2 set-up for a '390' FE, OR where I can find an old set-up ? |
| | RE: Ford FE 390 engine -- hot428ford, 02/22/2006
did you ever find a 3x2 intake |
| 62 galaxie ps pitman arm ? -- mike khett, 11/30/2005
Hi ive looked everywhere but the junkyards for a 62 galaxie ps pitman arm and my search has been fruitless. Can anyone here point me in the right direction? Thanks.mike
[Edited by Admin.] |
| | RE: Thought you guys might enjoy this one. -- walt, 11/28/2005
darn i have to buy two today,and did the nascar 427 come with 2 4v's |
| | | Yep - 427 was sold both 8v ('R') and 4v ('W'), like this car. [n/m] -- Mr F, 11/30/2005
n/m |
| | RE: Drool. Double-drool if it was an R-code. n/m -- Gerry Proctor, 11/29/2005
|
| | RE: Thought you guys might enjoy this one. -- John, 11/29/2005
I never was a Fairlane fan, but obviously I like the engine.....I even like the hood. I must admit,, it does sound too good to be true.....#1 of 11? Do any of you experts see any reason why this car might be a fake? Selling on e-bay kinda makes me wonder.... |
| | The only way to authenticate it would . . -- Orin, 11/29/2005
. . . be to get a VIN report from Kevin Marti. But then there is the staement that he won't let you inspect it until AFTER you've won the bid, which I'm sure raises a few suspicions. |
| | | He posted a link to the Marti Report N/M -- Royce P, 12/01/2005
N/m |
| | Neat, except for the wrong block, hood, intake, air cleaner... [n/m] -- Mr F, 11/30/2005
n/m |
| | Oh - and then there's all the darn Krylon on the springs, fuel tank... -- Mr F, 11/30/2005
n/m |
| | Appearently, he also is accustomed to . . . -- Orin, 11/30/2005
. . . . selling C*ies because he refers to this as a "35W" car, when we all know that "35" only idents the car as a Fairlane 500 hardtop, but the "W" is the engine code for 427-4V. I see what Mr. F means when he says it has the wrong hood. Here's a pix of the correct hood, right? http://www.sd455.com/fairlanehood.htm |
| | | The '66 hood is cool I think -- Royce P, 12/01/2005
It is supposed to have a flat hood with the modified bracing of course.
I think you could fix most of the screw ups pretty easily, the big problem being the block. Still it is priced right now ($60,000) at about half what a correctly restored R code would go for. The W is pretty darn cool too if you ask me.
Royce |
| Ford 352 -- Randy, 11/27/2005
Was wondering if anyone can tell me if the waterpump fan from a Ford 292 Y block could be used with a Ford 352 engine, the vintage of the car is a 1959 Ford. I have a cooling fan from a 292 and seems it will bolt up to the 352 fine, but not shure if they used a different fan for the 352 if anyone knows if the fans were all the same in those engines would appreaciate a reply. |
| | No problem, will interchange...n/m -- Lou, 11/27/2005
n/m |
| Help me pick a cam! -- Anthony, 11/26/2005
This is a followup to my earlier post about my 390 that clatters and will not rev past 4500.
I am convinced that there is a problem in my valve train of some sort, so I am going to start from scratch. I am going to pull the heads and have the valves done, check for hardened seats, replace the springs, locks lifters, cam, and possibly the pushrods.
The car (67 Mustang GTA) is a bone stock occasionally driven car. It has stock intake, exhaust manifolds, etc. I want to keep the stock appearance, but I am hoping a "step higher" cam will warm this car up a bit. Might as well while I'm at it.
I am running an Auto trans, the convertor has been tweeked for a slightly higher stall than stock. The rear is a 3.25 traction lock. Comp ratio is not known, but assumed to be stock. Also has power brakes.
So, bear in mind I know nothing about lift, duration, and the like, but explain and I will learn. Please help me pick a cam that will work for me, but not make the car cantakerous. I do not mind a little lope, so long as I have enough vacuum for the brakes. Comp Cams, Crane, and Lunati come to mind, and I would want to buy it all as a package.
Thanks in advance!! |
| | RE: Help me pick a cam! -- giacamo, 11/27/2005
265h comp cam,and lifters mach springs use onepice valve ratainers and crome molly pushrods the 265h works good with stock intake and exaust...... |
| | | Buy and electric fuel pump then see how it -- Lou, 11/27/2005
revs. |
| | | | RE: Buy and electric fuel pump then see how it -- Anthony, 11/27/2005
Been there, done that. No difference whatsoever. |
|