These are the old FoMoCo Obsolete Forums and are being hosted by JCOConsulting.com.
While you're here, check out my articles or have a look around at some of the
Ford Stuff we have for sale. You might find something you can't live without.
|
|
|
Skip Navigation Links.
 | Machine shop advice for 428 FE rebuild? -- Craig Nelson, 09/03/2000
With 122k miles on my original '66 Galaxie 7-litre (428) engine it time for a rebuild this winter. It has a couple of lifters that won't quiet down, often emits a nice cloud of smoke upon starting, and drips oil in several spots in my driveway (but at least it doesn't go "thunk" yet). The oil pressure dash light also has this incredibly annoying flicker at idle and I'm now in the habit of pushing the C6 into N to allow the engine rev a little to stop this light show. Is this normal? (not my behavior, the low oil pressure light).
My plan is to do the tear down myself and lug the heads and block to the local machine shop for the specialized work. I'm thinking they will need to grind the valves at the very least and possibly bore the cylinders. Since this is new territory for me I have a few questions:
1. Any suggestions on what specifically I should request the machine shop to do (or not do)?
2. What's the scoop on "hardened valve seats"?
3. People tell me to have them "balance the engine", what does this mean?
4. What does it mean to "blueprint" an engine?
5. If it needs to be bored what are the pros and cons on pistons (forged or cast)?
6. I understand there are several types of piston rings, which should I request?
7. Any ballpark ideas on what a machine shop will likely charge for these various items?
8. While its apart I'm thinking of adding a mild torquey cam, lifter set, a manifold, and possibly new carb (750 cfm) all from Edelbrock. Any other parts I should replace while its torn down? What about a different oil pump to stop that red engine light? This car is a cruiser not a racer.
9. Does anyone know where I can get some of those big thick rubbery valve cover gaskets? I admit I saw them on some Sunday morning motorhead show on TNN, but hadn't injested sufficient coffee to remember who makes them.
Thanks for any comments in advance. I enjoy reading this forum. - Craig |
|  | RE: Machine shop advice for 428 FE rebuild? -- KarlJay, 09/04/2000
I just had a valve job done and paid $400. This included hardened exhaust seats and surfacing two sides of each head ($100), as well as $25 for seals. Get the hardened seats on the exhaust ($100).
The 428 needs to be balanced, 390,427... don't have the same balancing setup (390/427 are internal / 428 is external)
I had problems with the machine shop: the valve job took a month, a rod was twisted and the shop said it was straight (the rod side clearance was not equal on both sides when torqued)
Be careful! If you just drag the heads,block... down for machining, you probably won't get any warranty. I saved about $300 and now I'm looking at having the crank returned and maybe replacing some/all of the rods. I only have about 50 miles on the engine and I've built about 12 engines before and never had this happen.
FE's like the dual pattern cam, I like the Crower ones and the exhaust needs more lift & duration. The Performer RPM is the only one ED intake worth having, the Performer is the same as the 390 GT 'S' intake, just made with alum.
pass up the forged pistons for most non-race usage. Spend the extra $20 on a hi-vol or hi-vol/ hi-pressure oil pump! I consider this cheap insurance. Costs: Bore: 120 general machining: $500~600 I wish I had let the shop do the whole thing, if you can get a 3year/30,000 warranty, I would consider that path. Best luck, Karl. |
|  | RE: Machine shop advice for 428 FE rebuild? -- Tom H, 09/04/2000
Just something else to think about. You may well be able to extend the life of your current short block. For a good rebuild expect to spend a couple of grand just for the short block and that's even if you do the disassembly/assembly yourself. Also expect many delays while waiting for the machine shop to get to your stuff no matter what they tell you. You may get lucky but be prepaired. machine shops have their prefered customers and generally give them priority.
I would pull the heads and inspect the cylinder walls. If there are any hone marks left and you can't rock the pistons back and forth and the engine is pretty clean inside I would just do a valve job, change the timing set and lifters (put in a mild cam at this time too if you want) and change the rear main seal if it's leaking. The rest of the leaks will be taken care of when you reassemble. A new oil pump will most certainly take care of your pressure proublems. The smoke at startup is caused by bad valve seals. They are possibly the cause of low oil pressure because they tend to crumble and find their way into the pan and then block the screen. Since the engine is not knocking, bearings are probably ok. You can pull a couple of caps, very carefully, and inspect them.
If this engine has had the oil changed regulary it's possible to get another 100k out of it.
Like I said, it's just another option. I recently did this to the 360 in my truck, adding headers, Edelbrock performer cam, manifold and 600 carb, and it now runs like new. The best thing is you only need to worry about getting the valve job done. The car will be down maybe a week instead of a month or more. |
| |  | RE: Machine shop advice for 428 FE rebuild? -- scott, 09/04/2000
gee sounds an afull lot like the 390 an my wagon, i would just take the whole moter to the shop let them tear it down they can inspect it for other problems as they do so. of course i seem to buy motors just to tear them down. the only thing better than rust encrusted fe straining the welds on yur cherry picker is a nice freshly painted rebuild going ready to drop back in. definetly put in the hardened seats on the exhaust valves while the motor is apart. if your existing valves are good i dont believe that they need to be upgraded for unleaded. if you need to bore go for the minimun oversize possable, that way you will have meat left to bore again if need be. most 428 blocks are pretty tough and you may get buy with honing and using your old pistons if the blockis not to far out of round. make sure the machinist has a torque plate to bore your motor. boring is relitively cheap at about 120.00 but you will need to buy new pistons. check with your machinist for piston price and availabilty. as far as cast vs forged pistons as i recall the 428 CJ used a cast piston and leave it at that. my machine shop charges about 150.00 to balance the short block assembly i.e. crank, rods and pistons. one thing to remember is that the 428 is externally balanced so if you have any flexplate damage you need to make sure that your new flexplate is at the shop because it is balanced along with the crank. balacing will help the life of your motor and let run smoother and perhaps rev a little easier, so its worth doing. as for rings anyname brand crome moly ring should be fine. cylinder honing probably has more effect on the intial seating than ring type. Blueprinting is simple deciding on a optimum set of clearances for the engine, setting a degree of tolorance and sticking within those parameters, true blueprinting can be horriblely expensive and is not really needed unless your are planning to actually do a lot of bracket racing or something. if your machinist has good equipt. and properly maintains it he should not have any problems with clearances when its time for assembly. iwould change the cam for 2 reasons 1) putting a used cam and lifters in rebuilt moter is something of a crap shoot at best-if a lobe or lifter goes south on you the metal particles are going to end up in your nice new bearings. buy a cam kit. 2) i would change the cam to a possably a CJ grind or modern cam profile-cams have evolved a lot in 30 years. dont over cam!!!! anything over 214*@050 is be more than you want in a 7Litre Galaxy. the diehards in my neck of the woods dont seem to think much of the regular edlebrock preformer. one quote " its a pickup truk manifold" ive heard that the preformer rpm is an improvement. personaly i would run a 428 pi manifold over the edlebrock. its aluminium and its the some as the CJ piece. or a cast iron CJ intake it works good from 2000 to 5500 rpm. ford got the CJ package right. the felpro gasket your saw on the tube should be avilable at any auto parts store. the suffix on the part number is R (for rubber as oposed to C for cork} also the felpro high preformance racing catalog list an eccellant "Felcoprene rubber oil pan gasket" that i like. as far as changing the carb. you most likily have a 595 cfm autolite 4100. this card is just about adequete for the stock 428 but if you change manifolds some like a 650 or 750 Would be more in order. while ive heard good things about the edelebrock carbs i would run a holly my self there easy to work on and parts are readily available. a 390 GT carb and a repro fueline would be about right. or 750 set up like the CJ carb with the coresponding pump and line might fill the bill depending on cam chioce. as far as oil pumps i like the mellings 57hv (high volume) although i have heard that if you have tight oil clearances on the crank they can tend to pump the oil into the valve covers. this is something to discuss with your machinist as it may have an effect on the clearances that you shoot for in the lower end. you definetly want to intall oil restricters under the rockerstands-have the machinest tap the hole so you can thread in holly carb jets, you can change jets or drill them out till you are happy with the oil flow to the rocker arms. one last thing if the crank needs turning (most really dont) turn it the minimum undersize. bearings are only availble in .010 and .020 oversizes, it is getting really hard to find a 428 crank that has not been turned .020. good luck on your rebuild. |
|  | RE: Machine shop advice for 428 FE rebuild? -- Bill Troth, 09/04/2000
Craig, you have a lot of good questions and it would take awhile for anyone to give complete answers on the forum. You might want to get these two books that will give you some good information: "Engine Blueprinting" by Rich Voegelin gives a very comprehensive expanation of machine shop proceedures, blueprinting, and performance modification. It will help you know what to ask of a machine shop and what to look for in a good one. The "bible" for any FE guy is "How to Rebuild Big Block Ford Engines" by Steve Christ. It gives a step by step explanation on all facets of FE engine rebuilding. Both of these books are available at libraries (my local library has them both and its not especially large) or the internet booksellers all have them for less than $20. Good luck. Bill Troth |
| |  | Echo the praises of Christ's book...HOWEVER: -- FE428, 09/05/2000
there is one important mistake in it...where he recommends drilling out the main oil passage to 7/8". This is too large, it should not be drilled out to more than 1/2" or you may weaken (leading to cracks) the main web.
Otherwise, definitely a book to get. |
 | labeling for 352 Engine -- Michael E. stanford, 09/03/2000
Its a 1965 ford f100-The motor (original I,m told) is stamped (raised enumeration)at the front, right side "85" and below that- "352". 4bbl intake, with an unlabeled 2bbl carb.(I need to rebuild carb, and can't determine what it is.
 |
 | 1958 352 & 332 colors -- Lou, 09/03/2000
What were the correct engine colors for a 58 Ford 352 engine and valve covers also the colors for the 332 engine and valve covers as installed in 58 ford cars. |
|  | I think the 352 was ivory w/ blue covers [n/m] -- Mr F, 09/05/2000
n/m |
 | 427 sohc wanted!!!! -- Brian, 09/03/2000
I need a timing cover and a set of adjustable rockers for a cammer any help out there is appreciated
Thanks Brian |
|  | 427 sohc under $10,000 wanted even more!!!! -- Dave Shoe, 09/03/2000
Sorry Brian,
I get a bit drifty whenever I hear of someone buying Cammer stuff.
Good luck in your search.
Shoe. |
| |  | RE: 427 sohc under $10,000 wanted even more!!!! -- Brian, 09/03/2000
Not sure what that remark means? Dave |
| | |  | RE: 427 sohc under $10,000 wanted even more!!!! -- Dave Shoe, 09/04/2000
Yup. Cammers get me thinking of what I SHOULD have been spending my money on, back when I saw one in a showroom window for $2200.00.
Man, I read your headline and immediately got an itch to join into yout Cammer search. Can't afford to, though. I doubt $10,000 will get me much of an anything, so I just gotta watch.
Maybe someday. Hope I didn't get in the way of your original post too much.
Shoe. |
| | | |  | Dove will sell you the complete heads for ~$10K -- Toivo, 09/15/2000
I KNOW you have the block. The only stumbling block then would be an intake. Ron Miller could get you the external drive and probably the intake too. I think you could dicker Dove down to the point where, using your short block, you could build essentially a new SOHC for ~12K-15K. Other people dream too.... |
| |  | RE: 427 sohc under $10,000 wanted even more!!!! -- RC Moser, 09/04/2000
I think dave means dreaming. We all wish we had a cammer with a huffer on ALky in a Duce coupe. Those parts or any head/timing related parts are like Gold. We all know how hard gold is to find now. I know the Swap meets wants outrageous prices. A guy wanted to charge me 10 bucks for a picture of some parts wasn't even a complete motor, and that was 15 years ago. Good luck. |
|  | RE: 427 sohc wanted!!!! -- Critter, 09/04/2000
Why shucks ya'll. I think I got one of them there suckers in a corner of my garage. Are they worth anything?
There was one on e-bay last week that sold for $ 4500, all it needed was a front cover, the shafts and rockers and intake. CHEAP! at twice the price. |
| |  | RE: 427 sohc wanted!!!! -- Dave Shoe, 09/04/2000
Man, I obviously snoozed thru that deal. Doggone it! It sounds like it's right in my price range, too. Ebay search is momentarily off-line, so I can't search out completed auctions right now, but I will check out the details in the morning. I expect I'm gonna be cranky (in a good sorta way) all day after I see it, too.
Shoe. |
|  | RE: 427 sohc wanted!!!! -- Jim Raymond, 09/22/2000
Try Carroll Shelby in L.A. he'll build you one, maybe he has some parts for sale. I've got his web site in favorites, but it's call "The Official Carroll Shelby World Wide Web Site"
Jim |
| |  | RE: 427 sohc wanted!!!! -- gordon, 09/24/2000
i know a fella who has a built 427 that runs real well that could be talked into selling it if i asked him real nicely it has dual quads and a big cam this thing really runs out well it cam out of a 68 torino fast back he got tired of having to wait for the cops while he out run em with it says it not fun anymore someone let me know what they would pay for a good one i,ll ask him gordon |
 | 390 rebuild...need mild performance suggestions -- gary, 09/02/2000
by the way, thanks to all who have been responding to my posts. its been a great help. so heres my next question. i have a 66 galaxie 500xl with a 390 2 bbl/c6/3.00 gears and im going to have it rebuilt.(this is the "thunking" motor. i would like some suggestions regarding more hp like cam, intake, 4bbl, headers etc |
|  | RE: 390 rebuild...need mild performance suggestions -- Bill, 09/02/2000
Everybody does there own thing, but all I wanted was a crusing car so here is what I did. Took a std 1967 pickup 352 bored it out to 390 with an Edelbrock performer cam, D2TTAA heads from a Ford pickup. The heads have std valves but smaller ports that match up with my 1966 S code GT manifold. Not going to win any drag races but in my 1965 Galaxie XL it is a good crusing motor. The heads had the hardend valves seats. Just another way to build a motor Bill |
| |  | RE: 390 rebuild...need mild performance suggestions -- Bill, 09/02/2000
Sorry I used the wrong spelling of the word their |
|  | RE: 390 rebuild...need mild performance suggestions -- Grant, 09/07/2000
I've been told the Edelbrock alum heads, Performer RPM cam and intake makes 418HP on a 390...see their website...the RPM intake might be too high though for hood clearance... |
|  | RE: 390 rebuild... my plans and problems -- Craig Nelson, 09/07/2000
I'm also rebuilding my FE ('66 Galaxie 7-litre) this Fall (see the good suggestions for machine shop work under my earlier post) and have decided to go with the Edelbrock line of cam/lifters, timing gear/chain kit, manifold, and carb. I checked numerous places and it appears that Autozone has the best prices, although everything is special order. I've recently talked to Ford guys with the Edelbrock setup at several car shows and they all preferred the Edelbrock carb over the sticky-floated Holley for their cruiser cars. For racing, however, they all use Holleys.
I understand that "Engine Blueprinting" by Rich Voegelin and "How to Rebuild Big Block Ford Engines" by Steve Christ are required reading for FE guys and my own personal bathroom copies are on the way from Amazon.com.
I have been unable to find a catalog that specifically lists headers for an FE block Galaxie. There are headers for FE block Fairlanes and Mustangs but I'm not sure if they will fit around the power steering works on a Galaxie. Has anyone else solved this problem? There are used FE headers from trucks on ebay that are fairly cheap, but would be no deal if they won't fit.
I've had several folks also suggest changing the stall converter in the C6, but I'm unsure about details on this. Anyone have suggestions?
A distributor/coil swap for a more modern electronic version would also be a good addition at this time. Anyone have recommendations on a relaible, simple ignition system for an FE cruiser?
Also it sounds like a high volume oil pump is a wise investment. Any suggestions on brands/models?
The information exchange on this forum is great! Please post any new information you get. It looks like there are many others out there with similar questions. - Craig
|
 | 390 Water pump/intake bypass -- Buck, 08/31/2000
While attempting to change the bypass hose the nipple attached to the intake manifold crumbled. I still can't believe I had no leaks! My question is: Is this nipple available and is it a simple press fit? How about using a nipple from an old water pump? |
|  | RE: 390 Water pump/intake bypass -- Tom H, 09/02/2000
They should be pretty easy to find. If not auto parts stores Ford should have them. They do press it. make sure the hole is clean and smooth and use some sealer, it will make tapping it in easier as well as seal possible leaks. Tap lightly as possible, they are easily damaged. |
|  | Brass Nipples -- COUGAR, 09/02/2000
Edelbrock used to supply a heavy brass nipple with their new intake manifolds. I don't know if they still do or not, but it wouldn't hurt to ask them. Or you could try a plumbing supply house. Brass won't corode away like the thin steel nipples that Ford used.
COUGAR |
|  | RE: 390 Water pump/intake bypass -- Bill, 09/02/2000
Part number C5AZ-8555-B Should be still available. You have to by a box of three. |
|  | RE: 390 Water pump/intake bypass -- FE4ever, 09/05/2000
Can anyone tell me exactly what the bypass is for? It seams as though there are lots of guesses, but I wonder if anyone knows for sure what the idea behind the bypass is for! |
|  | RE: 390 Water pump/intake bypass -- FE4ever, 09/05/2000
Can anyone tell me exactly what the bypass is for? It seams as though there are lots of guesses, but I wonder if anyone knows for sure what the idea behind the bypass is for! |
| |  | RE: 390 Water pump/intake bypass -- Tom H, 09/05/2000
It allows coolant to circulate within the block and heads while the thermostat is closed. Otherwise the heads would overheat before coolant at the thermostat warmed enough to open it. |
|  | RE: 390 Water pump/intake bypass -- W Bartels, 09/05/2000
I used a piece of plain old 1/2" copper pipe. I chamfered the end toward the manifold, tapped it in "carefully", and cut to length with a hacksaw.
|
 | MSD 8594 Pro billet Distributor for the GT390 -- Jeff Barrow, 08/30/2000
I'm thinking of upgrading my ignition, the original single point distributor on my '68 GT390FB Mustang is about had it (besides that I'm so sick of changing points). Does anyone have any experience with the MSD 8594 distributor on the FE? Was planning on mating it with the MSD 6AL box. Is this dizzy any good, will it improve Performance / reliability? Any tips, suggestions, comments would be appreciated.
Cheers Jeff (in New Zealand)
|
|  | RE: MSD 8594 Pro billet Distributor for the GT390 -- Dave Shoe, 09/03/2000
I like the stock distributor, but I'm just a sucker for factory castings.
Upgrading to a REAL ignition amplifier like the 6AL will get you the performance you seek. Retrofit a Ford electronic ignition into the stock distributor (it's an easy swap using 302/351/400/460 guts from the 75ish to 83ish era) or a Unilite or Pertronix trig, the "coil of your dreams" (no need to overdo it if you ain't supercharged or running killer fuel), a Duraspark cap conversion, and Duraspark fat wires will buy you all the performance you need without the extra bucks for a new distributor. Besides, the "stock" look of a stock distributor pays for itself.
You will wanna verify the old distributor has OK bushings (no slop), and you WILL need to have the advance springs recurved by a distributor wiz for your performance application.
If this seems to messy, go ahead with your distributor purchase and let us know how it turns out. I've never dropped the bucks for an aftermarket distributor, so I don't know how well they work. I'll bet you still gotta recurve the suckers.
JMO, Shoe. |
|  | RE: MSD 8594 Pro billet Distributor for the GT390 -- Pat in Rescue, 09/07/2000
I am using an MSD distributor and have had good luck with it. It comes with a selection of springs for setting when you want the timing to be "all in" as well as a selection of "stops" so you can change the initial timing. When you buy one it is also brand new and plugs right in to the 6AL box. |
|  | RE: MSD 8594 Pro billet Distributor for the GT390 -- Dale, 09/08/2000
I've been running a Pro Billet and 6AL in my small-block Cougar for five years. The chip rev limiter is great, however, you give up your vacuum advance. Try deleting the vacuum on your stocker and driving a while before you commit. |
 | Mystery FE heads -- Russell Wilson, 08/30/2000
I have a set of FE heads removed from a 64 Galaxie with a 406. The heads casting # is C4AE 6090C and I am told by the local machine shop via AERA book on casting # and spec's that they are " Mario Andretti Special " for a 406 in 64. My questions are 1) What application were they made for? 2) How many were made ? and 3) Should they be in a museum somewhere ? Some have suggested they are " Standard ", BUT they have significant differences from any other FE heads I have 390, 406 or 390 GT ( and I have a lot from 1962 to 1972 ). First they have large valves 2.02 and 1.67. Second, they have ports almost 1/3 again larger that ANY FE head I have including 406. And Third the chambers are modified and are not like any other FE head I have.All appear to be original modifications especially the chambers which were cast larger than STOCK FE heads. Hope someone out there can help or knows where I can obtain information. Thanks Russell |
|  | RE: Mystery FE heads -- Dave Shoe, 08/30/2000
My info has the C4AE-6090-C heads as 1964-289 heads w/54.5cc chamber. Dunno how accurate it is.
I'm not aware of any heads, other than HR heads (C3AE-K and C4AE-F) that had intake ports taller than the 406 heads. Most pre-emissions era heads were about the same height.
I'd really like to see some photos of these heads, as the port size and shape is of interest to me. Any way to post something visual? How about some ruler measurements? Also, what intake do you have, and how close is the port match between the heads and intake?
Shoe. |
| |  | RE: Mystery FE heads -- Maximus, 09/29/2000
they sound like and are cast to be 289 2V heads. do they have a 289 casting number inside the head? |
| |  | RE: Mystery FE heads -- Russell Wilson, 09/30/2000
Dave, I Don't remember if I ever responded to your request for pictures. If not I have them and will send . I am still trying to find some knowledgeable answers about these heads. Thanks Russell |
|  | RE: Mystery FE heads -- Anthony, 09/30/2000
There not FE heads. Do you even know what FE's are. Those valves are smaller than the smallest FE heads valves. And a the combustoin chaber you have, 58cc is really small. the biggest Fe had them in the 90's |
| |  | Anthony and Max......Regarding the FE heads -- Ed Foral, 09/30/2000
I have seen first hand a set of FE heads which appear to have the C4AE-6090-C casting number. The set I saw were off of a '64 390. They appeared identical to the C4AE-6090-G cast heads next to them, except for the casting numbers. The "C" was VERY close to the screw mark on the head, and there is a possibility, in my opinion, that what appears to be a C may be a G with part of it covered up.
Ed |
| | |  | RE: Anthony and Max......Regarding the FE heads -- Russell Wilson, 09/30/2000
Ed, I would possibily agree with you except for 2 things. 1) the ports on these heads are much larger then the 6090G heads that I have had and still have several pairs of dating from 1963 to 1970.and 2) the chambers are also differnt from any other FE heads I have seen or own. I have been dealing with FE fords (racing, collecting and restoring for about 35+ years) and have never seen a set of heads like these. I etched the numbers to make sure of the " C " and it is very clear that the numbers are original and is not as you correctly stated an illusion caused by the number being cast very close to the screw.I am still interested in anyone who has any information and especially documentation on " Mario Andretti Specials " which I understand to have been installed on 1964 406 Ford Galaxies. |
| | | |  | RE: Anthony and Max......Regarding the FE heads -- Ed Foral, 09/30/2000
Russel Etching would be of no help with the heads I am describing, and have very recently seen, as there is no trace of the portion of the letter which would distinguish a G from a C. Can you scan a picture of the casting number of your heads? The only FE head listed in the MPC with a taller intake port than a C4AE-G head is a high riser, which you definitely do not have. You described your combustion chamber as D shaped... this is the shape of a C4AE-G and the C4AE-C head which I have seen. You E-Mailed me with dimensions of a standard low riser port when describing the dimensions of your intake port, not one which is significantly larger than a low riser port. Please do not get me wrong, I am only suggesting that you may be mistaken in what you believe that you have, not making a personal attack. I would not put all of my faith in an AERA listing for your heads if I were you. The AERA listings are both incomplete and in some cases misleading. The AERA "Head Specification" book which I looked at recently made no reference at all to a C4AE-C FE head, and only listed a C4AE-C head as being from a 289.
Ed |
|  | RE: Mystery FE heads -- FPX, 10/03/2000
The head is a C4AE G head used on 64 2 and 4V 352 and 390 engines. NO Andretti Special here. Sounds like your machinist is blowing hot air up your dress. Suggest you change machine shops. |
 | Need answers too simple questions -- Ed, 08/30/2000
Hey guys, I'm new to FE's. Can someone tell me how much oil is needed for oil changes. Also, what grade of gas did ford specify for it. Have't checked timing yet but my truck knocks on mid grade fuel. |
 | 390 "thunking" -- gary, 08/29/2000
mr f suggested i run this post here. i have a 66 galaxie 500xl 390 2bbl with a c6 behind it. there is a thunking noise that sounds like it is coming from the oil pan. could it be a main or rod bearing? if so, can it be fixed w/o pulling the motor? i recently found out (by accident) that some kids ran it hard before i bot it. |
|  | RE: 390 "thunking" -- Dave Shoe, 08/29/2000
Thunking sounds serious.
Don't go discounting everything yet, though.
It's true that, at present, a rod might be trying to occupy the same time/space continuum as the crankshaft (hopefully you'll turn the ignition key in a counterclockwise direction before the merger is successful), but much fun remains in this beaten-but-not-beat motor.
If the motor was severely overheated, you might as well drive it hard until you see fireworks (bring a fire extinguisher). A severely overheated motor of any kind (i.e.: run dry of fluids) is no longer worth wrenching on.
But your motor wasn't. I believe I know the kids you bought it from.
It was simply hammered on and run dry of oil, so you've probably got no problems that a good ol' magnaflux and rebuild wouldn't fix right up. Also, 390 motors really are still "dime a dozen". For $300 you can pick up a fine running used 390 (65-and later is preferable, due to the motor mount modifications - you'll find one from a '74 F150) and plop in into your car, with no compatibility issues at all. Earlier motors are fine, too, as they'll tend to kick ass on the '66-later (emission) motors, due to the head design.
I'd probably look at buying a cheap engine stand (if it's really cheap, watch your toes - seriously), and renting a cherry picker twice - once to pluck the motor, and next to plop the motor.
You really need to either replace this motor (keep the original, if not overheated, for parts), or rebuild it yourself. It's important to repair the motor in a pleasant environment. You know: Good tunes, plenty of cold beer, out of earshot of nagging yells, no mosquitos. This is what owning an old car is all about. This is the good life.
Heck, back in the days when I wasn't varnishing six-panel doors, screwing subfloor joists, or replacing goddam roofing shingles (i.e.: back when I rented), I'd find time to rebuild my good ol' FE when the car in the next lane backfired.
You've picked up a snazzy old ride. Don't disgrace it by trying to minimize the repair effort. Yank that motor. Flip it around. Replace every gasket you can find spares for, reinstall the oilpan backwards just for yuks. Maybe even repair the original problem while you're at it.
It's definitely NOT fun to attempt repairing an old Galaxie in the most efficient possible way. Minimum effort also means minimum bonding with your car. This leads to poor communication with your car, and a poor sense of it's operating condition. When you can repeatably predict an operating catastrophe two minutes prior to it's occurance, then you are "at one" with your car.
Get to know yor car, Please! You have already learned what ignoring your children has done for their stunted development - don't repeat this mistake with a true friend and life partner.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that trying to repair your motor while it's still in the car is really gonna suck. It would frustrate and bore the heck outta me. You need to give the repair a "purpose" by planning to "soup it up". This is what FE ownership is all about.
JMO, Shoe. |
| |  | RE: 390 "thunking" -- bob wilson, 08/29/2000
you the man dave, tell him like it is!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|  | RE: 390 "thunking" -- Randall Horn, 09/03/2000
One thing you might check is to see (if it has one) if the windage tray is getting hit by one of the rod bolts. This happened to my Dads car the last time we rebuilt and needless to say he about lost it.
Randall |
|
|
|