These are the old FoMoCo Obsolete Forums and are being hosted by JCOConsulting.com. While you're here, check out my articles or have a look around at some of the Ford Stuff we have for sale. You might find something you can't live without.

Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21451&Reply=21451><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>In my continuing quest to keep things loose, please click here...</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Mr F, <i>05/11/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote><a href="http://www.scar.utoronto.ca/~99potmat/insanity.html">http://www.scar.utoronto.ca/~99potmat/insanity.html</a> </blockquote> In my continuing quest to keep things loose, please click here... -- Mr F, 05/11/2004
http://www.scar.utoronto.ca/~99potmat/insanity.html
 RE: In my continuing quest to keep things loose, please click here... -- kuch73, 05/11/2004
I guess I'm insane!
 That's what I sounded like when . . . -- Orin, 05/11/2004
. . . I used to drink!
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21450&Reply=21450><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Power Steering to Manual</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Tim, <i>05/11/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>Hi all! . I am removing the complete power steering from my 69 Mach 428cj  and installing a manual steering setup. Will the manual steering from a 67 Mustang work?.. Also the manual i have only shows  power steering. If anyone can e-mail to me a pic or diagram of a manual steering system,i would appreciate it.. THANKS! </blockquote> Power Steering to Manual -- Tim, 05/11/2004
Hi all! . I am removing the complete power steering from my 69 Mach 428cj and installing a manual steering setup. Will the manual steering from a 67 Mustang work?.. Also the manual i have only shows power steering. If anyone can e-mail to me a pic or diagram of a manual steering system,i would appreciate it.. THANKS!
 Yes - '67 should 'work'. Swap the whole deal, intact. [n/m] -- Mr F, 05/11/2004
n/m
 Be aware, tho' - Ford beefed up some parts, after '67. [n/m] -- Mr F, 05/11/2004
n/m
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21443&Reply=21443><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Comp or Lunati Cam for 390 Galaxie?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>joe, <i>05/10/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>  I Have to purchase a cam kit this week and would like to get some opinions on these cams. <br>       The car is a 66 2-door Galaxie with a 390 (.030).  It is being set up with a blue thunder 2x4 medium riser intake  with two holley 450's.  It has C8OE-A heads.  Crates headers and a C-6 with 2500 stall converter.  Stock gears for the moment. <br>     I am trying to choose a cam and I have narrowed it down to the comp cam 268 (218@.50 .494 lift  110 lobe)  or the Lunati Bracket Master II series (.223@50  .514 lift )<br>    I'm interested in having decent idle, vaccum, and  torque (considering it's a heavy car).  These two cam choices seem to me to be the maximum output before you start loosing those things.   But I am no cam-expert.   I want the most power I can get without giving up too much of those 3 charactaristics.   Any suggestions of other cams are welcome also,  But it's time for me to make the choice.   Thanks </blockquote> Comp or Lunati Cam for 390 Galaxie? -- joe, 05/10/2004
I Have to purchase a cam kit this week and would like to get some opinions on these cams.
The car is a 66 2-door Galaxie with a 390 (.030). It is being set up with a blue thunder 2x4 medium riser intake with two holley 450's. It has C8OE-A heads. Crates headers and a C-6 with 2500 stall converter. Stock gears for the moment.
I am trying to choose a cam and I have narrowed it down to the comp cam 268 (218@.50 .494 lift 110 lobe) or the Lunati Bracket Master II series (.223@50 .514 lift )
I'm interested in having decent idle, vaccum, and torque (considering it's a heavy car). These two cam choices seem to me to be the maximum output before you start loosing those things. But I am no cam-expert. I want the most power I can get without giving up too much of those 3 charactaristics. Any suggestions of other cams are welcome also, But it's time for me to make the choice. Thanks
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21445&Reply=21443><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE:  single or dual pattern cam profile?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>joe, <i>05/11/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>I also would like to know if there is an advantage to a dual pattern camshaft for use in a FE motor.  The Comp 265 looks interesting  (.211/.223@.50  -  .484/.510 lift). </blockquote> RE: single or dual pattern cam profile? -- joe, 05/11/2004
I also would like to know if there is an advantage to a dual pattern camshaft for use in a FE motor. The Comp 265 looks interesting (.211/.223@.50 - .484/.510 lift).
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21458&Reply=21443><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE:  single or dual pattern cam profile?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>giacamo, <i>05/11/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>the 265 works great in heavy weights and pickups i,v used the 265 in many fe 390,s and everyone loves the way it comes off idel.most run 600 to 650 carb. with a standerd or auto has a decent sounding idel and seams to last i also use one pice spring retainers and never forget to mach springs... </blockquote> RE: single or dual pattern cam profile? -- giacamo, 05/11/2004
the 265 works great in heavy weights and pickups i,v used the 265 in many fe 390,s and everyone loves the way it comes off idel.most run 600 to 650 carb. with a standerd or auto has a decent sounding idel and seams to last i also use one pice spring retainers and never forget to mach springs...
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21461&Reply=21443><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE:  single or dual pattern cam profile?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>joe, <i>05/12/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>That comp 265 looks about right.  It is a dual pattern design.  I might go for that or the single pattern comp 268.   I liked the lunati because there is a site that sold the entire kit with springs, retainers, and all for $249.  But it was a bit hotter than the others, and I do want a torquey, smooth running motor. </blockquote> RE: single or dual pattern cam profile? -- joe, 05/12/2004
That comp 265 looks about right. It is a dual pattern design. I might go for that or the single pattern comp 268. I liked the lunati because there is a site that sold the entire kit with springs, retainers, and all for $249. But it was a bit hotter than the others, and I do want a torquey, smooth running motor.
 Thanks- I'm going with the comp 265! -- joe, 05/12/2004
I called comp and they also said I would be most happy with the 265. I got the whole kit for $375. I think it's the best choice.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21440&Reply=21440><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>here's an interesting post from another forum</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>blinker, <i>05/10/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote> <br>Torino at the Hot Rod Pump Gas Drags<br>May 4 2004 at 9:26 AM Barry R   (Login Barry_R)<br> <br><br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br> <br>Hi folks,<br>I thought I'd give you an update on the Hot Rod Pump Gas Drags that I participated in over the weekend. The event got compressed into a single day due to inclement weather. Hot Rod, Comp Cams, and Memphis Motorsports Park busted tail to get this thing pulled off - or we'd have driven 12 hours to sit in rain. <br>The idea of the event was to drive 50 invited cars to the track, and to make three consecutive passes without opening the hood or tuning the car, all on spec 93 octane fuel.<br><br>I knew going in that I wasn't going to be a hitter. I was gambling pretty hard on the package, since pump gas was not what the car was built for - a 3600 lb. 1969 Torino with 13:1 compression and no power adders. Of course I was the only FE in the field. I also was the only non-5.0 style Ford.<br><br>After a major thrash to get the car assembled (engine installed into the car last Friday) I loaded into a trailer shared with another contestant (we rode like rock stars in a borrowed stacker semi rig - - the other guy has good "freinds").<br><br>The very first pass on this package was at the test and tune in Memphis the day before the event. It started raining as I went through the traps, but a 10.44 a 131mph gave me reason to hope.<br><br>The cruise was a brutal 33 mile drive through Memphis rush hour traffic. I installed the wrong radiator cap in the rush to get ready, and had no coolant recovery - coolant went out to the overflow but could not return. Temps climbed over 200, the car rattled pretty good(it only started pinging after temps went wild), but never boiled over and I made it to the track OK.<br><br>First pass went well - - 10.46<br>Second pass I saw water on the windsheild & let off - 10.80<br>Third pass the overflow tank was overflowing and the car got really loose in 2nd. Lacking common sense, I still went 11.15. <br><br>The 3 pass average of 10.80 put us pretty much in the middle of the pack. Not bad for an obsolete dinosaur, but we could have been in the hunt for a jacket with a little more practice - the tenth place guy had a 10.0 second average - not out of reach....<br>A lot of really stout cars didn't make it through - the FE did.<br><br><br> <br><br>  <br> <br> </blockquote> here's an interesting post from another forum -- blinker, 05/10/2004

Torino at the Hot Rod Pump Gas Drags
May 4 2004 at 9:26 AM Barry R (Login Barry_R)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi folks,
I thought I'd give you an update on the Hot Rod Pump Gas Drags that I participated in over the weekend. The event got compressed into a single day due to inclement weather. Hot Rod, Comp Cams, and Memphis Motorsports Park busted tail to get this thing pulled off - or we'd have driven 12 hours to sit in rain.
The idea of the event was to drive 50 invited cars to the track, and to make three consecutive passes without opening the hood or tuning the car, all on spec 93 octane fuel.

I knew going in that I wasn't going to be a hitter. I was gambling pretty hard on the package, since pump gas was not what the car was built for - a 3600 lb. 1969 Torino with 13:1 compression and no power adders. Of course I was the only FE in the field. I also was the only non-5.0 style Ford.

After a major thrash to get the car assembled (engine installed into the car last Friday) I loaded into a trailer shared with another contestant (we rode like rock stars in a borrowed stacker semi rig - - the other guy has good "freinds").

The very first pass on this package was at the test and tune in Memphis the day before the event. It started raining as I went through the traps, but a 10.44 a 131mph gave me reason to hope.

The cruise was a brutal 33 mile drive through Memphis rush hour traffic. I installed the wrong radiator cap in the rush to get ready, and had no coolant recovery - coolant went out to the overflow but could not return. Temps climbed over 200, the car rattled pretty good(it only started pinging after temps went wild), but never boiled over and I made it to the track OK.

First pass went well - - 10.46
Second pass I saw water on the windsheild & let off - 10.80
Third pass the overflow tank was overflowing and the car got really loose in 2nd. Lacking common sense, I still went 11.15.

The 3 pass average of 10.80 put us pretty much in the middle of the pack. Not bad for an obsolete dinosaur, but we could have been in the hunt for a jacket with a little more practice - the tenth place guy had a 10.0 second average - not out of reach....
A lot of really stout cars didn't make it through - the FE did.






Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21441&Reply=21440><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>moe info about the engine</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>blinker, <i>05/10/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>May 4 2004, 2:00 PM  <br><br><br>The car has been in my possession since 1981. Its been a fixture in the Detroit street racing community over the years. Never one of the real "hitters", but always in the game. I get it out to Milan perhaps 5 or 6 times a year - - usually on Friday nights.<br><br>It currently has a new 505 inch FE, based on a Genesis block, cast Scat crank, Edelbrock heads, and a bunch of Speed-Pro stuff (I work at Federal-Mogul).<br><br>The Hot Rod guys liked the engine concept enough that it will be covered in the July issue. As a courtesy to them I'll have to keep somewhat mum about the specs until the issue comes out in a few weeks. <br> </blockquote> moe info about the engine -- blinker, 05/10/2004
May 4 2004, 2:00 PM


The car has been in my possession since 1981. Its been a fixture in the Detroit street racing community over the years. Never one of the real "hitters", but always in the game. I get it out to Milan perhaps 5 or 6 times a year - - usually on Friday nights.

It currently has a new 505 inch FE, based on a Genesis block, cast Scat crank, Edelbrock heads, and a bunch of Speed-Pro stuff (I work at Federal-Mogul).

The Hot Rod guys liked the engine concept enough that it will be covered in the July issue. As a courtesy to them I'll have to keep somewhat mum about the specs until the issue comes out in a few weeks.
 RE: thanks for the post -- giacamo, 05/11/2004
a torino in the 10,s very inpresive.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21462&Reply=21440><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: here's an interesting post from another forum</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Barry R, <i>05/12/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>Thats me (and my car).<br><br>The car is a 3600 lb '69 Torino notchback.<br>505 FE, Ebok heads, solid roller<br>C6, 4.56 rear, coil over ladder bar, 13" DOT's<br><br>The package is street driveable - but not for anything approaching normal driving.  Its very loud, kinda hair trigger, and lacks any sort of creature comforts.  In other words its "just right" for an old Detroit street racer like myself.<br><br>The engine build will appear in Hot Rod in 3 weeks - I can give more detail afterwards.<br><br>Thanks,<br>BR </blockquote> RE: here's an interesting post from another forum -- Barry R, 05/12/2004
Thats me (and my car).

The car is a 3600 lb '69 Torino notchback.
505 FE, Ebok heads, solid roller
C6, 4.56 rear, coil over ladder bar, 13" DOT's

The package is street driveable - but not for anything approaching normal driving. Its very loud, kinda hair trigger, and lacks any sort of creature comforts. In other words its "just right" for an old Detroit street racer like myself.

The engine build will appear in Hot Rod in 3 weeks - I can give more detail afterwards.

Thanks,
BR
 RE: here's an interesting post from another forum -- giacamo, 05/12/2004
sound,s like a must read build. the 68 69 styial torino with fe power has allways inpressed me...........on and off the strip.....
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21436&Reply=21436><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Anyone got a photo of a 428 harmonic dampner?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>don, <i>05/10/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote> I think this 428 I just got has had the front balancer changed.It is very thin and doesnt have any counter weight on it.My 390 has a thicker balancer on it.I measured the bore so I know it is a 428 (T-Bird I think,dated 1966)but the guy I got it from put a 390 flywheel on it.I think maybe he changed the balancer too.If anyone knows where I can look up a photo of a stock one online,I would appreciate it. </blockquote> Anyone got a photo of a 428 harmonic dampner? -- don, 05/10/2004
I think this 428 I just got has had the front balancer changed.It is very thin and doesnt have any counter weight on it.My 390 has a thicker balancer on it.I measured the bore so I know it is a 428 (T-Bird I think,dated 1966)but the guy I got it from put a 390 flywheel on it.I think maybe he changed the balancer too.If anyone knows where I can look up a photo of a stock one online,I would appreciate it.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21437&Reply=21436><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: Anyone got a photo of a 428 harmonic dampner?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Charlie, <i>05/10/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote><a href="http://www.dscmotorsport.com/crankshafts.htm">http://www.dscmotorsport.com/crankshafts.htm</a><br><br>You can look at a new one from DSC motor on this web site. Can't imagine an old one would be different. Dennis sells good quality parts. </blockquote> RE: Anyone got a photo of a 428 harmonic dampner? -- Charlie, 05/10/2004
http://www.dscmotorsport.com/crankshafts.htm

You can look at a new one from DSC motor on this web site. Can't imagine an old one would be different. Dennis sells good quality parts.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21439&Reply=21436><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>don't need a photo.....</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>hawkrod, <i>05/10/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>you got the right one. there are five different balancers for a 428 depending on year and model. three of those are identical to a 390 as a 428 only has extra weight on the flywheel not the balancer. the first and most common balancer is the 66/7 thin one you have. 66/7 PI 428's had a very large and heavy balancer that is probably the rarest of all balancers. 68-70 standard 428, 428CJ, and 428PI's used either a C8AE-A1 or  C8AE-A2 balancer (the CJ should be the A2 but people seem to be willing to accept either!). this is the normal wider heavier balancer with a bolt on pulley. and finally there is the 69/70 428 SCJ balancer which larger than the standard part but also uses a bolt on pulley. the reality is most 428's should have the same balancer as a 390. now on to the next issue, how do you know it had a 390 flywheel? some 428 flywheels look identical to a 390 unit but have a small weight spotwelded on. not all 428's had the wagon wheel style and for that matter there is even a 3 piece unit used on many 66's so are you really sure you didn't have a correct part? note also that the current replacement flywheels are identical to the 390 part except for the weight so if he put a new one on it may have been correct but you may have been looking for something else. hawkrod </blockquote> don't need a photo..... -- hawkrod, 05/10/2004
you got the right one. there are five different balancers for a 428 depending on year and model. three of those are identical to a 390 as a 428 only has extra weight on the flywheel not the balancer. the first and most common balancer is the 66/7 thin one you have. 66/7 PI 428's had a very large and heavy balancer that is probably the rarest of all balancers. 68-70 standard 428, 428CJ, and 428PI's used either a C8AE-A1 or C8AE-A2 balancer (the CJ should be the A2 but people seem to be willing to accept either!). this is the normal wider heavier balancer with a bolt on pulley. and finally there is the 69/70 428 SCJ balancer which larger than the standard part but also uses a bolt on pulley. the reality is most 428's should have the same balancer as a 390. now on to the next issue, how do you know it had a 390 flywheel? some 428 flywheels look identical to a 390 unit but have a small weight spotwelded on. not all 428's had the wagon wheel style and for that matter there is even a 3 piece unit used on many 66's so are you really sure you didn't have a correct part? note also that the current replacement flywheels are identical to the 390 part except for the weight so if he put a new one on it may have been correct but you may have been looking for something else. hawkrod
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21442&Reply=21436><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: don't need a photo.....</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>don, <i>05/10/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote> I know its a 390 flywheel because he pulled out a 390 and put in the 428.He had a 428 auto flywheel but wanted to keep the standard trans so he told me he just used the 390 flywheel.I just hope he didn't drive it much with it in there.He told me it sounded like it had a nice cam in it.I guess that shaking was fooling him.This guy was no mechanic.he messed up a lot on this car/ </blockquote> RE: don't need a photo..... -- don, 05/10/2004
I know its a 390 flywheel because he pulled out a 390 and put in the 428.He had a 428 auto flywheel but wanted to keep the standard trans so he told me he just used the 390 flywheel.I just hope he didn't drive it much with it in there.He told me it sounded like it had a nice cam in it.I guess that shaking was fooling him.This guy was no mechanic.he messed up a lot on this car/
 yeah, that will do it.... -- hawkrod, 05/11/2004
it does sound like he was a real gem. the wrong flywheel will give it a lope and a terrible vibration. if it was driven sanely then you will probably be okay but the out of balance condition can wipe out bearings. worn in bearings can handle it better than new ones, so like i said you may be okay (low oil pressure would be a clue to any damage, if the oil pressure is fine the odds are the bearings are still okay!) hawkrod
 RE: Anyone got a photo of a 428 harmonic dampner? -- don, 05/10/2004
Thanks
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21428&Reply=21428><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>modified a 390</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>filiot, <i>05/10/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>Hi, does it is possible to modified a 390 into a 428 cj?Pleas tell me what i must do if it's possible,thanks. </blockquote> modified a 390 -- filiot, 05/10/2004
Hi, does it is possible to modified a 390 into a 428 cj?Pleas tell me what i must do if it's possible,thanks.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21433&Reply=21428><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: modified a 390</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Gerry Proctor, <i>05/10/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>Well you can go here to identify all the parts that you'll need:  <a href="http://www.428cobrajet.com/id-main.html">http://www.428cobrajet.com/id-main.html</a><br><br>But this assumes that your 4.05" bore block can go 80 out to 4.13" which is usually not possible to do and maintain bore integrity.  Then you have to get the 428 (or 410) crank and the right CJ rods.  Of course, you'll need the CJ heads and intake as well as the CJ exhaust manifolds.<br><br>In the end, if you can do all of this, all you'll have is a tarted-up 390.  It's a far more doable prospect to modify the 390 to equal or exceed the 428CJ in output without fussing over the displacement.  Very easy to to. </blockquote> RE: modified a 390 -- Gerry Proctor, 05/10/2004
Well you can go here to identify all the parts that you'll need: http://www.428cobrajet.com/id-main.html

But this assumes that your 4.05" bore block can go 80 out to 4.13" which is usually not possible to do and maintain bore integrity. Then you have to get the 428 (or 410) crank and the right CJ rods. Of course, you'll need the CJ heads and intake as well as the CJ exhaust manifolds.

In the end, if you can do all of this, all you'll have is a tarted-up 390. It's a far more doable prospect to modify the 390 to equal or exceed the 428CJ in output without fussing over the displacement. Very easy to to.
 RE: modified a 390 -- Lucas, 05/14/2004
Gerry is right. Forget the attempt to build a 428 from a 390 block. The shorter stroke of the 390 will allow higher rpm, but less torque than the longer stroke 428. Here's what works for me in my Cobra replica (2600#,
4 speed toploader, 3.50 rear) 390 block, magnafluxed and pressure tested. Bored .040 over, 390 cast crank, cleaned up,
chamfered and polished, stock 390 rods magnafluxed, balanced and resized, with ARP bolts, 9.8:1 pistons, Reed hydraulic camshaft
with .568" lift, Edelbrock Performer RPM Heads, Comp cams roller rockers ,Edelbrock Performer RPM intake with 850 Holley carb. and KN filter. Makes about 430 HP on 93 octane unleaded.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21417&Reply=21417><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>4-speed trans</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Tim P., <i>05/09/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>Is there a 4- speed for 390 to fit a truck thats not setup as a creeper gear in 1st is ther a setup as such? </blockquote> 4-speed trans -- Tim P., 05/09/2004
Is there a 4- speed for 390 to fit a truck thats not setup as a creeper gear in 1st is ther a setup as such?
 Sure, but depends on truck and year n/m -- Lou, 05/10/2004
n/m
 RE: 4-speed trans -- Tim P., 05/11/2004
I Have a 68 F-100 390what tranny options are there for this set up
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21416&Reply=21416><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Exhaust, Tires--'66 Fairlane 390</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Joe K., <i>05/09/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>Gents,<br><br>As some of you may have realized, I did get that 1966 Fairlane 500 2-Door hardtop I mentioned a few months ago.  We picked it up for $1000...solid body, never wrecked, interior needed only some repainting where surface bubbling had affected some of the painted areas...and it needed new carpet.  Well, it has been painted now--PPG black urethane enamel basecoat + 4 coats of clear.  It's also running pretty well, and we did rebuilt the whole brake system basically.<br><br>I was wondering what kind of exhaust you would recommend for the 390 2bbl.  I will eventually upgrade to a 4bbl, but can't afford it right now (I'm 18 and about to enter college at the University of Georgia--Go Dawgs!).  I would like to run some FPA long tube headers and 2.5" or possibly 3" pipes with Magnaflow mufflers...does anyone second this combination?  Does anyone disagree?<br><br>The 'Lane is shod with 15x7 Magnum 500s...will a 255 70/15 tire fit on the rear?  I'd really like to fill the wheel wells up without going to a drag radial, since this is my daily driver.   I'm running 225 60/15 BFG TA's on the front.<br><br>Any responses are appreciated.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Joe Knight </blockquote> Exhaust, Tires--'66 Fairlane 390 -- Joe K., 05/09/2004
Gents,

As some of you may have realized, I did get that 1966 Fairlane 500 2-Door hardtop I mentioned a few months ago. We picked it up for $1000...solid body, never wrecked, interior needed only some repainting where surface bubbling had affected some of the painted areas...and it needed new carpet. Well, it has been painted now--PPG black urethane enamel basecoat + 4 coats of clear. It's also running pretty well, and we did rebuilt the whole brake system basically.

I was wondering what kind of exhaust you would recommend for the 390 2bbl. I will eventually upgrade to a 4bbl, but can't afford it right now (I'm 18 and about to enter college at the University of Georgia--Go Dawgs!). I would like to run some FPA long tube headers and 2.5" or possibly 3" pipes with Magnaflow mufflers...does anyone second this combination? Does anyone disagree?

The 'Lane is shod with 15x7 Magnum 500s...will a 255 70/15 tire fit on the rear? I'd really like to fill the wheel wells up without going to a drag radial, since this is my daily driver. I'm running 225 60/15 BFG TA's on the front.

Any responses are appreciated.

Thanks,
Joe Knight
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21422&Reply=21416><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>congrats on the fairlane`</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>dennie, <i>05/09/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>I love these 66-67 intermediates, i was actually looking for one when i saw the ad for a 67 caliente, i thought i knew most ford/merc models.. well anyways if you have power steering as i do the headers are a big problem. you can drop the cylinder and they will fit. As for the wheels <a href="http://woodyg.com/fairlane/">http://woodyg.com/fairlane/</a> has a tire size chart and a few of the guys are running 255/60/15s so i assume you'll be ok.by the way is that an H code 66 fairlane?? </blockquote> congrats on the fairlane` -- dennie, 05/09/2004
I love these 66-67 intermediates, i was actually looking for one when i saw the ad for a 67 caliente, i thought i knew most ford/merc models.. well anyways if you have power steering as i do the headers are a big problem. you can drop the cylinder and they will fit. As for the wheels http://woodyg.com/fairlane/ has a tire size chart and a few of the guys are running 255/60/15s so i assume you'll be ok.by the way is that an H code 66 fairlane??
 RE: congrats on the fairlane` -- Boidman Of ATL, 05/09/2004
If you are going to keep the engine stock ,do not change to a 4bbl as the 2bbl is better suited to the engine.Too many carbs can also be fattening for an engine if you dont have the true need for them.
 Don't for get the . . . -- Orin, 05/10/2004
. . X or H pipe with that new exhaust.
Also, those 255-size tires you're eyeing will cut down your gas mileage -- more rubber on the road = more resistence = more fuel consumption. As a college student I KNOW you're familiar with that formula. :-) You may want to stay with the 225s instead.
I have a 67 Fairlane (V=8, but NOT and FE) that I'll be running 215s or 225s on when I'm done.
 RE: Exhaust, Tires--'66 Fairlane 390 -- Gerry Proctor, 05/10/2004
Flowmasters makes an American Thunder exhaust system for your car. Includes everything but a downpipe to connect up to the manifolds. You'd have to visit a muffler shop to have a downpipe fabricated to fit the system.

Money could be an issue. Kit goes for about $300.00 but it is a quality mandrel-bent 2.5" system.

Tires are iffy depending on what rims you run. You can go 255 on the rear but you need to pay attention to the rim offset. You'll won't be able to go that wide on the front and maintain your turning radius.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21402&Reply=21402><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>distibutor gear</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>67 hotcomet, <i>05/08/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>i have a 1967 390 that has munched 2 distributor gears.about 4 teeth right next to each other are gone.<br> does anyone know what could cause this?<br>i think its either a bad cam gear or the oil pump is binding up?<br>     </blockquote> distibutor gear -- 67 hotcomet, 05/08/2004
i have a 1967 390 that has munched 2 distributor gears.about 4 teeth right next to each other are gone.
does anyone know what could cause this?
i think its either a bad cam gear or the oil pump is binding up?
 Sure - intermittently bound oil pump would do it. [n/m] -- Mr F, 05/09/2004
n/m
 RE: distibutor gear -- giacamo, 05/09/2004
hi press oil pump, pump jamming from debris
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21398&Reply=21398><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Will a 390 flywheel on a 428 cause damage?n/m</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>don, <i>05/08/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote> </blockquote> Will a 390 flywheel on a 428 cause damage?n/m -- don, 05/08/2004
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21399&Reply=21398><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Yes!</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Wayne K., <i>05/08/2004</i></font><br /><blockquote>The 428 is externally balanced while the 390 is internally balanced. It's a no go without the correct one.<br><br>W. </blockquote> Yes! -- Wayne K., 05/08/2004
The 428 is externally balanced while the 390 is internally balanced. It's a no go without the correct one.

W.
 RE: Yes! -- don, 05/08/2004
Even just to start it to see if I can get the engine to run?Do you know the balance weight difference?
 RE: Will a 390 flywheel on a 428 cause damage?n/m -- giacamo, 05/09/2004
not if it,s rebalanced to 428 spects.
Go to the top of this page
Go back one page Back    Next Go forward one page

101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120