These are the old FoMoCo Obsolete Forums and are being hosted by JCOConsulting.com. While you're here, check out my articles or have a look around at some of the Ford Stuff we have for sale. You might find something you can't live without.

Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17816&Reply=17816><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Arp intake bolts</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>mIKE, <i>07/14/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>I tried to install my Edelbrock performer intake this weekend on to my edelbrock rpm heads using ARP engine fastener kit.  Four of the bolts are to long. anyone else have this problem. </blockquote> Arp intake bolts -- mIKE, 07/14/2003
I tried to install my Edelbrock performer intake this weekend on to my edelbrock rpm heads using ARP engine fastener kit. Four of the bolts are to long. anyone else have this problem.
 RE: Arp intake bolts -- Allen, 07/15/2003
Are you sure you are installing all the bolts in the correct locations? I installed an Edelbrock performer on my stock 390 heads, and the ARP kit has different size bolts. I don't remember exactly, but I think the two rear most bolts, and the two front bolts were shorter. Maybe you installed the short bolts in the wrong position. Other answer may be they gave you the wrong kit if you didn't specify what heads you were using.
 Get some washers. -- James, 07/21/2003
Usually the intake bolts will gall the surface on aluminum intakes. I go to Ace hardware and get some stainless washers to put under them. This serves two purposes really. Not only does it prevent the intake from disfigurment but it helps insure accurate and even torgue readings.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17810&Reply=17810><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>priming lifters</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Chad, <i>07/14/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>I did a search on priming lifter's and didn't find anything. So my question is this do you soak them or pluge them in oil or both.<br>After doing this will they still make noise on start up. Getting ready to do my first cam change, trying to understand everything.<br>Thnks </blockquote> priming lifters -- Chad, 07/14/2003
I did a search on priming lifter's and didn't find anything. So my question is this do you soak them or pluge them in oil or both.
After doing this will they still make noise on start up. Getting ready to do my first cam change, trying to understand everything.
Thnks
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17811&Reply=17810><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>We were discussing this, late yesterday...</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Mr F, <i>07/14/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote><a href="http://jcoconsulting.com/ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=85660&Reply=85635">http://jcoconsulting.com/ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=85660&Reply=85635</a> </blockquote> We were discussing this, late yesterday... -- Mr F, 07/14/2003
http://jcoconsulting.com/ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=85660&Reply=85635
 Thanks-nm -- Chad, 07/14/2003
n-m
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17813&Reply=17810><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>suggestion</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>James, <i>07/14/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>Since this is your first cam. Be sure to follow the cam break in procedure of holding the rpm's to 2000 for so 5 minutes or what ever is printed on your cam manufacture's liturature then change the oil. This may seem like an odd procedure but truthfully this is where cams usually go bad.  </blockquote> suggestion -- James, 07/14/2003
Since this is your first cam. Be sure to follow the cam break in procedure of holding the rpm's to 2000 for so 5 minutes or what ever is printed on your cam manufacture's liturature then change the oil. This may seem like an odd procedure but truthfully this is where cams usually go bad.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17814&Reply=17810><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Do not fill the lifters or soak them.</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Royce Peterson, <i>07/14/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>You should put oil on the outside only, then install the lifters. They are really easy to adjust when empty, that way you know for sure that you are in the range of plunger travel. After adjustment is complete install a priming tool in the distributor hole. When oil pressure comes up the lifters will all fill with oil. I install a manual reading guage to be able to tell that it works properly.<br><br>Royce </blockquote> Do not fill the lifters or soak them. -- Royce Peterson, 07/14/2003
You should put oil on the outside only, then install the lifters. They are really easy to adjust when empty, that way you know for sure that you are in the range of plunger travel. After adjustment is complete install a priming tool in the distributor hole. When oil pressure comes up the lifters will all fill with oil. I install a manual reading guage to be able to tell that it works properly.

Royce
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17829&Reply=17810><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Question about priming tool</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Allen, <i>07/15/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>When you use a priming tool to prime the engine, do you spin the drill in reverse, or forward (clockwise or counterclockwise when looking down the distributor hole)?  Just curious as I will be doing this in a few days. </blockquote> Question about priming tool -- Allen, 07/15/2003
When you use a priming tool to prime the engine, do you spin the drill in reverse, or forward (clockwise or counterclockwise when looking down the distributor hole)? Just curious as I will be doing this in a few days.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17831&Reply=17810><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: Question about priming tool</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Royce Peterson, <i>07/15/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>Same direction the distributor turns, counterclockwise.<br><br>Royce </blockquote> RE: Question about priming tool -- Royce Peterson, 07/15/2003
Same direction the distributor turns, counterclockwise.

Royce
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17843&Reply=17810><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: Question about priming tool</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Chad, <i>07/16/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>On average how long do you keep it spining to make sure the lifters are primed up?<br>Thanks for all the helpful tips. </blockquote> RE: Question about priming tool -- Chad, 07/16/2003
On average how long do you keep it spining to make sure the lifters are primed up?
Thanks for all the helpful tips.
 RE: Question about priming tool -- Royce Peterson, 07/16/2003
I like to install a cutaway valve cover so I can verify that oil comes out of the rocker shafts at all points so I might have to spin it for a couple minutes to see both sides.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17805&Reply=17805><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>73 390 Cam</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Packman, <i>07/13/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>What is the maximum lift, duration and lobe seperation that I should consider for a truck that I want plenty of torque and good bottom/mid improvements as compared to the stock setup.  I do not mind a little bit of a loping idle.  I do not plan to turn more than 5500 rpm or so.  At what lift would the stock rocker arms, and springs start failing?<br><br>I have plans to install an Edelbrock Performer intake (currently 2 barrel) and 600 cfm carb.<br><br>Also,  does the pertronix require an MSD box or anything other than the pertronix insert for the distributor.  Will this allow me to get rid of the springs and weighted plates in the distributor?  Does it have an adjustable vacuum advance or how will I know the advance is optimized?<br><br>Any help on cam lifts and pertronix is appreciated. </blockquote> 73 390 Cam -- Packman, 07/13/2003
What is the maximum lift, duration and lobe seperation that I should consider for a truck that I want plenty of torque and good bottom/mid improvements as compared to the stock setup. I do not mind a little bit of a loping idle. I do not plan to turn more than 5500 rpm or so. At what lift would the stock rocker arms, and springs start failing?

I have plans to install an Edelbrock Performer intake (currently 2 barrel) and 600 cfm carb.

Also, does the pertronix require an MSD box or anything other than the pertronix insert for the distributor. Will this allow me to get rid of the springs and weighted plates in the distributor? Does it have an adjustable vacuum advance or how will I know the advance is optimized?

Any help on cam lifts and pertronix is appreciated.
 RE: 73 390 Cam -- Ross, 07/14/2003
Myself I like to run FE cams a little more agressively than a small block. But to be on the safe side, I'd shoot for 224 degrees @ .050 or less. Dont worry as much about the advertised duration.

Stock guides and rockers will be fine, but the springs can only take .500 or so. Some can slip a little more by, but .500 lift at the valve is a good rule of thumb

The Pertronix only lets you get rid of the points, the advance will still be there, you need it there. You may have got a bad one, but they usually dont go bad, dont be afraid of advance.

You wont "know" if the advance is optimized, however, a good rule of thumb for a mild 390 like you are talking is 10 degrees intial, with vacuum advance hook to ported vacuum. If it pings, pull it back to 8 initial

You could mess with special curves, and having a fancy distributor setup, but to be honest, with the setup you are running it wouldnt add that much. Money would be better spent on headers and a dual exhaust
 Did you call... -- James, 07/14/2003
Call the cam manufucters on this one. You will find that everyone on here has a different cam that they swear by. We all mean well and there are tons of people on hear that know about cams but we can get you into trouble because we do not know if you need vacuum for things like power brakes and an automatic trans and if you have an automatic trans are you willing to invest in a stall converter to handle an aggressive cam profile.

When you call the cam people they will ask you what the vehicle will be used for plus all the questions that I just mentioned with a healthy seasoning of other pertanate questions that need to be considered.

Reason that I am being so thorough on this one is that all new and curious people have a tendancy to put in a cam that is to aggressive the first time and you have never been so misurable with an engine than when you have went to lump on the cam. It can take all the fun out of driving it. Ask me how I know that?
 66 Ford Fairlane 500 -- Frank Cricenti, 07/13/2003
Anyone interested in a 1966 Ford Fairlane 500. Presently it is a rolling body. It is presently primered. The car is very solid. The only rust on the vehicle is in the front floor pans(have replacement pans)
Body is complete without plastic or rust. Solid Doors, Fenders, Rockers and Quarters. All trim is included but is removed as the car was getting prepped for paint. I ran out of money after completing a 1966 Ford Fairlane 500XL. I also have addl parts such as 2 doors, 2 Fenders, Hood, trim parts instrument panel and many others... It is originally a 289 car.

I live very close to Buffalo, NY but on the Canadian side of the border. The vehicle has a clean title. Will email pics if interested. Asking 2,900 obo.

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17794&Reply=17794><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>428 cj edelbrock heads</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Doug, <i>07/13/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>I 'm trying to find out the best rocker and pushrod set for a 428 cj when using Edelbrock alum. heads. the block is not decked and has not been bored. Also I ,m thinking of using a Lunati 428 cj oe replacement cam this cam has the same specs as stock. </blockquote> 428 cj edelbrock heads -- Doug, 07/13/2003
I 'm trying to find out the best rocker and pushrod set for a 428 cj when using Edelbrock alum. heads. the block is not decked and has not been bored. Also I ,m thinking of using a Lunati 428 cj oe replacement cam this cam has the same specs as stock.
 RE: 428 cj edelbrock heads -- tom, 07/13/2003
im useing the stock lenth on mine there perfect the heads are great .
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17801&Reply=17794><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Well.....</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Royce Peterson, <i>07/13/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>Erson makes the best rocker assembly for this application. I am partial to Crane hardened pushrods but I believe Lunati also makes good ones. Search "Erson Rockers" for a ton of information and pictures on this forum.<br><br>Royce </blockquote> Well..... -- Royce Peterson, 07/13/2003
Erson makes the best rocker assembly for this application. I am partial to Crane hardened pushrods but I believe Lunati also makes good ones. Search "Erson Rockers" for a ton of information and pictures on this forum.

Royce
 RE: Well..... -- 390 ranger, 07/13/2003
I ordered pushrods from crower. and use the harland sharpe rockers and shafts. with billet spacers from dove i havent had any trouble yet. i don't run radical lifts on my came and don't spin it higher then 6500 rpms. i am thinking of installing dove pedestals for peace of mind. lift is at .560
 RE: 428 cj edelbrock heads -- Doug, 07/16/2003
Thanks for the help.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17793&Reply=17793><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Speedometer gear</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Lee Harris, <i>07/13/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>I am rebuilding my 67 stang and I would like to know if anyone knows what speedometer gear I will need to make the speedo read right now that I put 3.80:1 gears in the stock 8" rearend. Any sites would be helpful also.<br><br>Thanks guys,<br>-Lee </blockquote> Speedometer gear -- Lee Harris, 07/13/2003
I am rebuilding my 67 stang and I would like to know if anyone knows what speedometer gear I will need to make the speedo read right now that I put 3.80:1 gears in the stock 8" rearend. Any sites would be helpful also.

Thanks guys,
-Lee
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17798&Reply=17793><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>If it was accurate before the swap, no problem...</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Mr F, <i>07/13/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote><a href="http://jcoconsulting.com/ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=29407&Reply=29389">http://jcoconsulting.com/ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=29407&Reply=29389</a> </blockquote> If it was accurate before the swap, no problem... -- Mr F, 07/13/2003
http://jcoconsulting.com/ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=29407&Reply=29389
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17802&Reply=17793><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Mr F in old post are you sure you want speedo low?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>dennie, <i>07/13/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote> </blockquote> Mr F in old post are you sure you want speedo low? -- dennie, 07/13/2003
 Ooops...right idea - wrong words. Thanks. :-) [n/m] -- Mr F, 07/13/2003
n/m
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17790&Reply=17790><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>coolant through carb spacer?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Gord, <i>07/12/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>I drive my 390 Galaxie only in the summer in the Pacific Northwest and was thinking that I probably don't need the coolant passing through the carb spacer of the 4BBL.  Is it OK to by-pass the carb spacer and route the heater hose direct to the water pump?  How about driveability?  Isn't a cooler fuel charge better for performance as well? </blockquote> coolant through carb spacer? -- Gord, 07/12/2003
I drive my 390 Galaxie only in the summer in the Pacific Northwest and was thinking that I probably don't need the coolant passing through the carb spacer of the 4BBL. Is it OK to by-pass the carb spacer and route the heater hose direct to the water pump? How about driveability? Isn't a cooler fuel charge better for performance as well?
 Sounds Ok - and it can't hurt to try. :-) [n/m] -- Mr F, 07/13/2003
n/m
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17807&Reply=17790><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: coolant through carb spacer?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Travis Miller, <i>07/13/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>Tried it years ago on a '64 390/300.  Could not tell any difference in way engine ran with or without coolant thru carb spacer.  </blockquote> RE: coolant through carb spacer? -- Travis Miller, 07/13/2003
Tried it years ago on a '64 390/300. Could not tell any difference in way engine ran with or without coolant thru carb spacer.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17817&Reply=17790><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: coolant through carb spacer?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Gerry Proctor, <i>07/14/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>The coolant spacer has two functions.  The obvious one is to keep the carb from icing on the cold, humid, days.  The other is too keep the carb from percolating on the very hot days when you're in traffic jams.  While I'm not predicting you'll have these problems, the potential is there for either situation to occur.  If you are using an aluminum intake, you may want to use a phenolic or other heat-insulating spacer to avoid fuel percolation problems. </blockquote> RE: coolant through carb spacer? -- Gerry Proctor, 07/14/2003
The coolant spacer has two functions. The obvious one is to keep the carb from icing on the cold, humid, days. The other is too keep the carb from percolating on the very hot days when you're in traffic jams. While I'm not predicting you'll have these problems, the potential is there for either situation to occur. If you are using an aluminum intake, you may want to use a phenolic or other heat-insulating spacer to avoid fuel percolation problems.
 RE: coolant through carb spacer? -- Gord, 07/14/2003
hhmmm....good point, It didn't occur to me that the coolant was actually a coolant. You never think of that as a hot stream runs down your arm.

Thanks.
 It does and it dosn't............ -- Ed Jenkins, 07/14/2003
......like so many "good ideas" some work and some don't.
The Ford engine coolent heated carb spacer is a good example of this in practice.

My personal opinon on this set up is that it was orignaly intended to heat up the carb on cold mornings, but it tends to cool the carb at this time becase of the cool engine coolent...

also when the engine is heated up, when you want a cooler fuel charge it heats up the carb thereby heating up the fuel.

(I'm sure you know the effects of tempature on fuel)

It almost operates backwards of the way that it was intended.

No harm will come of by passing this feature.... most other FE engines did not have this feature and operated fine without it and with the heater core hose going directly into the water pump.

I'm bypassing mine on my Galaxie...

If you are interested I have an idea to use this spacer in a heat exchanger system.

My first post in months. How does it rate?
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17844&Reply=17790><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: coolant through carb spacer?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>gramps, <i>07/16/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>I had 390 p/u with spacer by passed no promble in stop & go trafic on 110-115 days. Dont if it helped didnt hurt. </blockquote> RE: coolant through carb spacer? -- gramps, 07/16/2003
I had 390 p/u with spacer by passed no promble in stop & go trafic on 110-115 days. Dont if it helped didnt hurt.
 Idea -- James, 07/21/2003
For those of us who run the Edelbrock heads it might not be a bad idea to have this on a vehicle that is driven on a daily basis. The reason I say this is that we Edelbrockers do not have a heat riser through the heads into the intake to help keep the car running smooth in those temperatures that the heat riser is designed to help with. That is a thought. What do the wiser folks have to say about this idea?
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17788&Reply=17788><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>installing a intake gaskets</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Chad, <i>07/12/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>quick questioned. I'm getting ready to do a intake swap, and on the intake gaskets they have a raised area around the ports, is that the intake side or the other way around. The flat side goes on the head.<br>I trying to do this once.<br>thanks ahead of time. </blockquote> installing a intake gaskets -- Chad, 07/12/2003
quick questioned. I'm getting ready to do a intake swap, and on the intake gaskets they have a raised area around the ports, is that the intake side or the other way around. The flat side goes on the head.
I trying to do this once.
thanks ahead of time.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17789&Reply=17788><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Are you refering to the...</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>James, <i>07/12/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>Fel-Pro intake gaskets. If so, the flat part goes on the head and the blue print-o-seal toward the intake. Please do not use this gasket. They are too soft and allow the engine to drink oil. There are a lot of people in this forum, including myself, that have had very bad luck with these gaskets. Buy the Victor Reins gaskets from NAPA or Gessford.com. They are cheaper than the Fel-Pro gaskets and you will never have a problem with them. Not just my .002 but the gospel truth. </blockquote> Are you refering to the... -- James, 07/12/2003
Fel-Pro intake gaskets. If so, the flat part goes on the head and the blue print-o-seal toward the intake. Please do not use this gasket. They are too soft and allow the engine to drink oil. There are a lot of people in this forum, including myself, that have had very bad luck with these gaskets. Buy the Victor Reins gaskets from NAPA or Gessford.com. They are cheaper than the Fel-Pro gaskets and you will never have a problem with them. Not just my .002 but the gospel truth.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17791&Reply=17788><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: Are you refering to the...</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Chad, <i>07/12/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>I have both fel-pro and victor's and I will use victor's. On the Victors they do have that raised edge also. there again I assume the flat side goes on the head?<br>Thanks. </blockquote> RE: Are you refering to the... -- Chad, 07/12/2003
I have both fel-pro and victor's and I will use victor's. On the Victors they do have that raised edge also. there again I assume the flat side goes on the head?
Thanks.
 nope. -- James, 07/14/2003
They will only line up with all the holes one way. You will have a raised edge at the top where the intake and the head meet to make the valve cover gasket seal if you are not careful. Pay close attention to this when laying it in there or you will be having to grind it down to match the surfaces. You will see what I mean. Using something for a straight edge there would be a good idea.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17787&Reply=17787><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>horsepower potential for 390 tripower</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>dennie, <i>07/12/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>Hello  I need to tell carb man a horsepower estimate so he can jet my 3 rochesters correctly. I plan to have engine built as well as I can afford. It's a fair weather driver only in my 67 caliente. I figure if I remove power steering or adapt it to work with headers somehow, new valve train and a compression upgrade I can get 400hp fairly easily. I know the 3 rochesters barely equal a 750 holley, but I love the novelty, kinda why I love my merc in the first place. thanks  </blockquote> horsepower potential for 390 tripower -- dennie, 07/12/2003
Hello I need to tell carb man a horsepower estimate so he can jet my 3 rochesters correctly. I plan to have engine built as well as I can afford. It's a fair weather driver only in my 67 caliente. I figure if I remove power steering or adapt it to work with headers somehow, new valve train and a compression upgrade I can get 400hp fairly easily. I know the 3 rochesters barely equal a 750 holley, but I love the novelty, kinda why I love my merc in the first place. thanks
 Ford got 401 HP in 1961 n/m -- Teddy, 07/14/2003
n/m
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17783&Reply=17783><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>High-Performance 390</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Roessel, <i>07/12/2003</i></font><br /><blockquote>I have a '68 Mustang GT 390. I am trying to set up a good balance of performance items. Let me list the following extras and maybe somebody can tell me if they all make for a good mix: Edelbrock #7105 Performer RPM FE Intake Manifold, Edelbrock 750 cfm #1411 Carburetor, Edelbrock Performer RPM FE #6006 Aluminum Heads, Comp Cam FB 270H-10 Magnum Camshaft. Any idea what kind of Horse Power we will end up with? </blockquote> High-Performance 390 -- Roessel, 07/12/2003
I have a '68 Mustang GT 390. I am trying to set up a good balance of performance items. Let me list the following extras and maybe somebody can tell me if they all make for a good mix: Edelbrock #7105 Performer RPM FE Intake Manifold, Edelbrock 750 cfm #1411 Carburetor, Edelbrock Performer RPM FE #6006 Aluminum Heads, Comp Cam FB 270H-10 Magnum Camshaft. Any idea what kind of Horse Power we will end up with?
 Nice combination! -- Royce Peterson, 07/12/2003
Should get close to 400 HP with headers and competent assembly practices i.e. good valve job, good ring seal. Those two items can cost you 50 - 100 HP if done improperly.

The 270H is a great cam for a street deiven car.

Royce
Go to the top of this page
Go back one page Back    Next Go forward one page

181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200