Skip Navigation Links.
| 428 PI kickdown. -- peter, 12/24/2001
Is the kick down linkage on a 428 police interceptor C6 the same as a 428cj in a mach 1 69 C6 ...I need one and have had a police interceptor kick down offered to me but I don't know if they are the same...... Any help would be great in either matter.....Are the kickdowns on a mach 1 similar to any other cars? regards Peter...... |
| | You mean the linkage ends or just the 'rod'? [n/m] -- Mr F, 12/24/2001
n/m |
| | | RE: You mean the linkage ends or just the 'rod'? [n/m] -- peter, 12/24/2001
Either, I'm not fimiliar with either set up, and I'm in need of a factory 428cj C6 kick down linkage rod and fittings for a mach 1. And i have been offered one from a P.I. 428 and the guy doesn't know either. Any clarification on the parts would help me. Thanks. |
| | | | Rod is Mustang/Cougar, only; rest is mixed but not Galaxie. [n/m] -- Mr F, 12/24/2001
n/m |
| | | | | Thanks Mr F . I appreciate your time and efforts. -- peter, 12/24/2001
n/m. |
| Oiling modifications -- Jeff H., 12/23/2001
Well, after 3 years of collecting parts/info for my 428SCJ build I am finally ready to build a shortblock. The first order of business is the mandatory oiling mods. The block I have is an NOS service replacement block. I have a good idea of what needs to be done but I would appreciate everyone's input so I don't overlook anything. I am not looking forward to digging thru several years collection of magazine articles and books to get the info that I need. Also, if anyone has relevent articles available electronically please send them to my email (jeffholter@yahoo.com). FYI I will be running a solid roller cam.
Thanks in advance Jeff |
| | RE: 427 for sale -- Mike McQuesten, 12/23/2001
Let's estimate: Good, crack free, standard bore '63/'64 Center Oiler block: $1,200; true '63 low riser heads in crack free, good condition: $1,000; induction (less correct air cleaner?): $1,000; that's about all that I can tell is there. A C3AZ solid lifter cam is available new from Crane or Comp. Oh, correct harmonic balancer is probably worth: $300. A center oiler crank: $200(A nice standard 390 cranks works real well); low riser rods: $100. All of these prices are my opinionated estimates based on limited market research. Your opinions may vary wildly. So not counting a cam my estimate is $3,800. Machine work is mentioned and that may be a $1,000 worth? So if you like to gamble $5K on an engine you know nothing about.........not me. BTW, those '65/'66/very early '67 valve covers will not work with adjustable rockers. They might be '66 Farilane GT or GTA because they're chrome. Chrome or not they're only good for standard non-adjustable rockers because they're too short. Maybe you could stack vc gaskets until the rockers would quit banging? Again, not me and just my thoughts/opinions. |
| | | RE: 427 for sale -- Mac, 12/23/2001
i finnally got a list of ALL FORD part nmbers for engine parts so now im gonna go 427 hunting till i find one or i ruin all my clothes looking for one |
| | | | Really? Is it a dated Ford list or something else? [n/m] -- Mr F, 12/24/2001
n/m |
| | | | | RE: 427 for sale -- Gary C, 12/24/2001
Don't want to burst your bubble Mac, but George Reid's book is full of errors. I have the book and had found it to be less than trustworthy on casting #s. Besides, Ford seems to have mixed casting #s on the FEs indiscriminately. Steve Christ's book is better. As I have read what Shoe has to say about the SA book, and I agree--it provides some good information on FEs and makes for some good laughs while reading the errors and contradictions, but I certainly will not use it as my only authority while exploring bone yards.
JMO--Gary C |
| | | | | | RE: 427 for sale -- Mac, 12/25/2001
damn it hwat books are good then cause i blew 20 bucks |
| Help with engine casting # -- Styletone58, 12/22/2001
I found an FE transplanted into a 1968 T-bird. The C4AE-G heads caught my attention. I can not Identify the block casting #. It is: C3AF-6015-Z This is close to a 427 number, per Steve Christ's book, but the block does not have cross bolts.
Thanks! |
| | RE: Help with engine casting # -- Mike McQuesten, 12/22/2001
I think you may have a '64 transplant in that bird. The C3AF block is probably a carry over from '63 with the very common '64-'65 C4AE-G heads. Then again it could be a '63 engine that someone has installed a different year set of heads on. Probably a 390 but it may be a 352? Won't know until you tear it down. |
| | RE: Help with engine casting # -- Mac, 12/22/2001
my interchange manual says that the head is a 351 390 High Performance head |
| | | RE: a what? -- Mike McQuesten, 12/23/2001
Casting C4AE-G is another garden variety standard FE head. Mine came stock on a '65 390-4V. I bought the car from the original owner. Standard, regular 390 - 300 horse. They are not HP heads. We have seen them on numerous '64-'65 352 & 390s. A fairly easy head to find.
Casting C4AE-G is a nice head to build into a high performing FE head. They can be built to perform as well as if not better than a low riser 427 head or even the vaunted 428 CJ head - C8OE-N. Just install the larger CJ/or 427 valves. Do a little pocket porting and you have a nice set of heads.
Remember, it must be said time and again, these heads will NOT work with stock 390GT or 428CJ exhaust manifolds. With the proper headers they will work in a uni-body Ford/FE vehicle. |
| | | | RE: a what? -- Mac, 12/23/2001
ahh im a moron i cant type it says 352 - 390 im a friggin moron |
| | | | | RE: no way! -- Mike McQuesten, 12/23/2001
No way Mac! This is a great forum for all of us to learn. A few months ago I thought I knew a lot about the mighty FE. I've learned a lot right here about just how much I don't know. Happy Holidays to everyone. |
| | | | | | RE: no way! -- Tom, 12/23/2001
no im a moron casue i cant type |
| Warning....PWS-gen.Hooker Virus Found -- Jim, 12/22/2001
Look out gals and guys.
Someone sent me an email with a 40k virus attached.
The email address was < FORD.MUSTANG@mail.tele.dk>
The name was "Brian Guldhammer Lar... "
The attachment was: Me_nude.MP3.scr
Subject was just "Re:"
DONT OPEN IT!
There is no cure available for the virus on the file Me_nude.MP3.scr
CyberAIDS?
LUCKILY HOTMAIL AUTOMATICALLY SCANS EVERY ATTACHMENT
This is the only place that I use junk_yard_racing@hotmail.com for.
Darn, and I thought I was going to get to see Brian nude LOL
Must be one of those low-life Chebby FOOLS doing it.
|
| | Just a couple clarifications -- Mr F, 12/22/2001
I
appreciate your warning - thanks. Meanwhile, here's some extra info to
help the other readers:
Look out gals and guys. Someone sent me an
email with a 40k virus attached.
Actually, that filename is linked with a
fairly new bug known as W32/Badtrans. There are two variants, one
of which (".b", "-B" or "PWS-Hooker") includes a password-stealing
Trojan that may or may not work. Check out this page for more info,
including a fix: Badtrans-B Worm Info
But whatever its name, I'm glad you were
able to intercept it. And I thought it might be
instructive to point out that it wasn't sent via our server. Nor was it
sent as a result of posting here....at least, not directly. I'll explain
in a moment...
This is the only place that I use
junk_yard_racing@hotmail.com for. Darn, and I thought I was going to get
to see Brian nude LOL Must be one of those low-life Chebby FOOLS doing
it.
This worm attacks local computers
running Outlook or Outlook Express. It sends
a copy of itself to anyone in the user's Address Book and some
related folders. So, its clear that somebody had
your "junk_yard" mailto on their local hard drive.
Perhaps you've accidentally used it somewhere
else....or maybe to send a private eMail to someone here? How the guy
from Denmark got it is anyone's guess but that's a good reason to never
"forward" eMails to a long list of addressees.
Hope this info helps.
Mr
F | |
| 390 to a 428 in a falcon. -- SLiDeR, 12/21/2001
Ok all here goes. I have a 69 Falcon with an inline-6(runs great). Here is what I want to put in it a 428. I have a 64 Merc. 390 and I am willing to take it the .080 over.. but I need to find a good 428 crank (cheap). I also would like to know if I will need new pins or rods. Lastly I know I have asked this before but what engine brackets and mounts will I need to fit this engine in the car? Thanks again for having patience with the newby. AndI hope I don't go broke trying this project |
| | RE: 390 to a 428 in a falcon. -- Mike McQuesten, 12/21/2001
How could a peson go broke doing something as simple as installing an FE where it never was before? You must have bucks to start a project like this. Actually it's no more difficult than putting an FE into any Ford not equipped with such originally. So have some economical fun....go find FE brackets/mounts from any 390/428 Fairlane/Comet/Torino/Montego. Then get the radiator and the little special brackets that go with it. Oh, get the trans cross member too. I think you might need that. How about the suspension of that 6 poppin' Falcon? Neat huh? You should have something heftier than those springs & brakes & spindles that offer you cute 4 lug wheel attachment. Why don't you just take all the front suspension pieces from that donor unibody FE car while you're getting those brackets/mounts? How about the little spicer rear end in that fine '69? Yup, it might even be an 8" which will last a couple of hard starts with the 428 before you pull the pinion right through the 8" case. So, get that 9" housing while you are picking over that FE 'lane, etc.
It can all be done SLiDer. It has been many times. Crites Restorations even makes the brackets/mounts you'll need to set that 428 between to shock towers of that '69. I don't know what your budget is. But you will need some cash to put this together in a safe way.
Also, those '64 rods should be okay with good preparation and an ARP bolts/nut kit. They're the right length rods. You'll need the 428, 4.13 bore pistons and new pins. And that '28 crank (cheap)...? Speaking of budgets it sounds like you might be working on a tight one. Many of us are. Just think about the reality of this dream before you go a lot further. Then again, it takes a dream to get it things going. And I've always thought the '66-'69 Falcons offer a great short wheel base for a big block car. Install a Fairlane nose and you have a nice looking "Faircon". |
| | | RE: 390 to a 428 in a falcon. -- Bob, 12/21/2001
I had a '66 Falcon wagon with a 428. Ran like cheetah until a tree fell on it during an ice storm. Hate the Fairlane dash and front end. Besides the Falcon front end is lighter and more streamline.
You will need a donor car as Mike said so it won't be cheap or easy or quick to put together. But do it anyway.
|
| | | | RE: Fairlane/Falcon nose.. -- Mike McQuesten, 12/21/2001
Sorry Bob. I knew I shouldn't have popped off about that Fairlane nose thing. It's just my lame opinion and I should have stated as such. I'm really not that down at all on any Falcon body parts. And I tend to agree with you about the big round guages of the Falcon vs. the too common looking Fairlane guages of '66-'67....oh there I go again, just my lame opinion.
|
| | | | | RE: Fairlane/Falcon nose.. -- Bob, 12/21/2001
Actually the Fairlane has the big round gauges if I recall correctly, but I like the wider Falcon instrument panel as it is easier to work on or modify. |
| | | | | | RE: Fairlane/Falcon nose.. -- SLiDeR, 12/22/2001
thanks to both mike and bob. you've been a big help. AS for the donor car well there is none but I will getthe parts anyway ;-) I have my ways. Any suggestions as to what I harness my FE with transmission wise? |
| | | | | | | RE: Fairlane/Falcon nose.. -- Bob, 12/22/2001
I always use a top loader 4 speed, but many people use the C6. No other real choices. |
| | | | | | | | A 67 Fairlane? -- SLiDeR, 12/22/2001
Would a 67 Fairlane be a good donor car for the rearend, axle, and the beefed up front end? |
| | | | | | | | | RE: A 67 Fairlane? -- Mike McQuesten, 12/22/2001
If it's a factory FE car, it will be perfect. If it's a 289 car or even a 200 cube sixer, not much help. |
| | | | | | | | | | RE: A 67 Fairlane? -- richard, 12/23/2001
if you can find a 68-69 fairlane with an FE then use that as a donor car. otherwise you need the FE mounts, engine and frame, rearend, and trans to fit the FE. as for the trans a top loader 4sp or a tremec 5sp would work. for an auto use either a C6 or a lentech AOD(they have bellhousings for that conversion). this combo goes together like it came from the factory, which since the 66 up falcons were a shortend and restyled fairlane it did. oh use the disk brakes from the fairlane/torino. |
| 427 piston dome -- BOB HOPKINS, 12/21/2001
Any body know what "cc" to use for 427 midum-riser dome pistons, has a C5A XXXX partnumber on them forgot to bring paperwith partnumber with me, |
| 427 -- Tom, 12/21/2001
hey how do i tell a 427 from a 390 or 428 without pulling heads or checking the main caps? |
| | Re: 427 -- Paul M, 12/21/2001
Look at the side of the block. I'll say *most* 427's had screw-in, instead of push-in, freeze plugs.
Also look at the casting # of the heads. If it's an original engine (good luck!) the heads on 427's were unique, I believe. Check casting # on the side of the block, f one exists. Date codes, etc, can be helpful also.
Others might have other ideas, as well.
Hope this helps some! |
| | | RE: Re: 427 -- Mike McQuesten, 12/21/2001
Paul forgot the most obvious external indication that you might be looking at a Ford 427...the heads of the cross bolts, three of them on the lower skirt of each side of the block. BTW, Center Oiler blocks had standard press-in freeze plugs. Most of the side oilers got the screw in plugs. Anyway, the external indication of cross bolt main bearing caps in the most obvious thing to look for if you think you're looking at a 427. Not an absolute though......could be a conversion. |
| | | | My bad. -- Paul M, 12/22/2001
Actually, he mentioned "without checking the main caps", and when I think main caps on a 427, I think cross bolts.
Hence why I didn't mention it :)
Good point though, and one other one is the drivers side of the block.
If it's a side-oiler, it'll have screw-in plugs in the obvious galley that runs down the side of the block, just above the skirt.. |
| | | RE: Re: 427 -- Davy Gurley, 12/21/2001
Try "search" under 427. There has been a lot of iformation on 427s posted. Look for cross bolts (some have them and some don't), side oiler castings (may or may not, depending on year of manufacture), siamesed cylinders, freeze plugs aren't always screw in, some are pressed in. Best to pull a head and check bore and stroke. There are many variations. |
| | | | RE: Re: 427 -- Mac, 12/22/2001
so i pretty much have to pull the heads to find out right? |
| Off topic sort of -- Jim, 12/21/2001
Im looking a 850 cfm DP to run on my FE. Does anyone know what this holley is...list3310-2 2128 |
| FE Heads -- Tom Hyde, 12/21/2001
Does anyone know what these heads are? Casting # C1AE-6090-A Thanks |
| | RE: FE Heads -- Jim, 12/21/2001
<I think that just post this somewhere else by accident>
Yes, they are junk heads,,,tiny ports, tiny valves, etc.
Dont bid on them so I can get them cheaper as the gigh bidder.
Just kidding.
I have just searched the archives looking for info on these $3 ebay heads. There is very little info there.
Hers some of what I found...
RE: C3AE-C cc?
by Travis Miller
One thing needs to be discussed here. By small combustion chamber, are we meaning the ones with the rounded corners? I call the chambers in a C1AE-A head with the two square corners, the large non-performance chamber.
RE: FE Head info wanted
by Greg B
My book shows C1AE-A as being 352/390 1961-63
71cc-74cc chambers
2.02"intake valve
1.55" exhaust valves
Others may have more info
|
| | | Also.... -- Jim, 12/21/2001
RE: FE Head info wanted
by Greg B
My book shows C1AE-A as being 352/390 1961-63
71cc-74cc chambers
2.02"intake valve
1.55" exhaust valves
Others may have more info
|
| | RE: FE Heads -- Ray, 12/21/2001
It's a good head to start with if your not in the numbers game. It's a tall port low riser and will accept 2.09 x 1.65 or 1.72 valves, this particular head I've seen on 61 H.P. 390's and T birds. I would not pay more than $100 at a wreckers, when finished you diffinitly will be surprised at the performance. P.S. Don't worry about the chambers, there OK to. |
| | | RE: C1AE not on true HP 390 -- Mike McQuesten, 12/21/2001
You won't find C1AE heads originally installed on a '61 390HP engine. Sorry, you just won't. You won't find a '61 T-bird with a factory installed 390HP either. If you are looking at a true '61 390 High Performance that was rated at 375 with a single Holley or 401 horses with a trio of Holley 2 barrels, you will see heads numbered COAE-6090-D. The C1AE is a good all around low performance head. I've seen them on lots of standard FEs with 2 barrels and 4 barrels from the factory. A 4 barrel carb does not make a High Performance FE. Hence, you won't find a true HP 390 in a 'bird.
And Jim mentioned C3AE-C........oh man, we've been there before. Now you're talking some HP/Compression building potential. They're confusing but they're good.
Sum it up: The C1AE offers the same potential horsepower production as the C4AE-G and lots of other sandard/common heads. The C1AE does not offer uni-body exhaust manifold adaptability. |
| | | | Mike, would like to hear more about C3AE-C's and.. -- Jim, 12/23/2001
after that, a little comparison to the C3AE-D would be appreciated from a great "non-numbers playing" guy like you :) |
| | | | | RE: C3AE-Cs? -- Mike McQuesten, 12/23/2001
I was afraid you'd ask Jim. I will try to be succinct which is obviously difficult for me. But I'm workin' on it.
Okay here's what I know about the C3AE-C. A very short time ago I thought the C3AE-C was a early 406/405 tri power head only. It has a "tight" combustion chamber listed in various publications with a cc-volume of 56 - 61. They also were factory equipped with the standard intake valve, 2.02, and a new 1.66 exhaust valve. Along with factory machining for valve spring cups. They were unique to the early '63 406 tri power engine thus the last of the factory 405 horse 406. The 4-V 406/385 was still equipped with the '62 head, C2SE-C. I "think" this all factual and true. Now, here's where it gets crazy. Last summer, my FE fanatical cohort, John Saxon, finds two sets of these C3AE-Cs in a pile of FE heads at a local engine rebuilding company. He picks up both sets for a very reasonable price. Good friend indeed, one set is for me. Strange thing about these heads.....standard small valves, 2.02-I/1.55-E. No machining for spring cups. What gives? The combustion chamber looks like the tight ones I've seen on genuine 406/405 heads. John takes the time to cc 'em and gets a actual 64 cc with the standard size valves. I post to this forum to ask what gives. All kinds of response that these heads are farily common as found on many 1963 390-4Vs. But no one has ever seen them on anything other than '63 390-4Vs. Here's our humblie opinion: FoMoCo was still building the '63 390 with the dished piston introduced in 1961. The '61-'62-'63 390 which was only offered as a 4 barrel (in standard hydraulic form-NOT HP - which is a unique 390 from block on out) was built with this engine which was offered with a 9.5:1 compression ratio in '61 & '62. In '63 the compression ratio got bumped up to 10.5:1, true premium fuel range. The horsepower rating on the standard 4V 390 did not change - 300 horses. So we figure the engineers saw an easy way to get more power out of the 390 by using the C3AE-C heads and their small cc combustion chambers with the dished pistons that they had a warehouse full. By 1964 things had changed. Again, I don't understand what or why. I'm sure it may be that pistons were cheaper to produce than heads. A change was made in '64 to flat top pistons for the 390. The heads used? I've seen C1AE-A and C4AE-G on both 390s and 352s starting in '64. The compression ratio for the '64 390 remained at the new for '63, 10.5:1. What am I going to do with the cheap set of C3AE-Cs I have on the shelf? Easy decison, I'm going to have them machined for spring cups, machined and pocket ported for 2.09 Intakes and 1.66 Exhausts and there you go.....a nice set of high compression heads. |
| | | | | | | RE: C3AE-Cs? -- Mike McQuesten, 12/25/2001
Yup, those are the good ones. They may be the smallest c-chambers the seller has seen but apparently he hasn't seen the COAE-D chamber. And you're welcome Jim. Again, John and I believe they'll make excellent high compression heads with the right pistons. And we think that's a good price for the C3AE-C. |
| | RE: FE Heads -- Ray, 12/22/2001
Like I said Tom don't get in the in numbers game, that particular head will make big H.P. when your done. It's good head to start with, I'am currenly working on a 61 T Bird engine in our shop with that particular head on it ! It's an original owner car, and when we'ar done with the engine. I would like to see some of these so called numbers people bring there hot rod over to compare there! H.P numbers. Ray Tirri |
| | | RE: sorry Ray... -- Mike McQuesten, 12/22/2001
I'm not playing "numbers games" Ray. As I said the C1AE is a fine head that has the potential of a similar head, the C4AE-G. We built a set for a '64 427. Installed the CJ/low rise '27 valves with a little pocket port work. They're great like you think.
My counter was to your statement that you were working on a '61 T-bird with an HP390 and it had the C1AE heads. I don't claim to be a correct parts number boy. Far from it! I've built a combination '63 427, '65 427, C3 & C7 rods, C3J Pistons, COAE-D heads, etc. No, correct part numbers aren't important to me. However, I do call it when I see someone labeling a a 390 in a '61 Thunderbird an HP390 engine. No doubt you can build that 390 or any 390 into a HP beatin' mill. Please, just don't be calling it a '61 High Performance 390. |
|