Skip Navigation Links.
| kickdown linkage - 67 fairlane FE -- George, 07/17/2002
Writing this for a friend who is redoing a 67, 390 equipped GTA convertible - one of 2112. When he bought it, it did not have the kickdown linkage. The little ear-shaped actuator is on the pedal linkage, but it stops there. According to The Manual, there are two pieces of linkage, plus a little flange that mounts the assembly to the transmission. He needs it all. Does anybody here have these pieces, or can anyone direct him to where this stuff can be found? I take delivery of my new 66 Fairlane on thursday. The 390 is ready to drop in the engine room. Remember me? I'm the one who said he bought a factory drag suspensioned, rust-free Texas Fairlane hardtop. Well, it's on its way, and I will update the forum as to the status of this car. I'm sure I will be looking for advice and/or parts. Thanks, all. Try to email me directly at cyclone65afx@aol.com. I'll just get the responses faster. Cheers George |
| | RE: kickdown linkage - 67 fairlane FE -- Gerry Proctor, 07/17/2002
The kickdown for the FE Fairlane is unique to that car and I have never seen one (other than the one I have)...even on ebay. There is a reasonable solution if your friend isn't into concours restoration. Lokar makes a cable actuated C6 (yes, specific to the C6) kickdown. It requires that the rod and lever throttle linkage be removed (not a bad thing at all) and replaced by their throttle cable and bracket. You can then connect the kickdown cable to their throttle bracket and then to the trans. It's a very simple and attractive solution. |
| | | RE: kickdown linkage - 67 fairlane FE -- Turin, 07/17/2002
Do they make one for a FMX/390 setup? edelbrock carb (600cfm)? |
| | found a 68 390 torino GT today.... -- hawkrod, 08/05/2002
and got the kickdown linkage as i know it is a tough item to find. the 68 is a little different from 67 but they will interchange (you can put a 68 on a 67 but not the other way around). let me know if you are interested otherwise it goes on e-bay wednesday when my current auctions end. thanks, hawkrod |
| Hot car don't start -- Turin, 07/15/2002
I'm sure you've answered this before but... My 69 Galaxie XL (390) doesn't like to start when it's hot, and sometimes when it's not so hot. have new battery,starter,alternator. It did O.K. for a few days then started acting up again. I replaced the ground wire, but it didn't help. could a short in the electrical system be the problem or did a REALLY bad ground wire cause this new alternator to die? the second start up it acts begrudgingly. third time...forgetabout it. also one start and a 30 mile drive with an hour rest after... no dice. |
| | RE: Hot car don't start -- John, 07/15/2002
You havn't described enough info on your problem, but there are two things to look for (for a start, no pun intended). First, is the engine trying to crank over at all? Hot FE's are difficult to turn over and the stock starter barely makes it crank. Secondly, a number of rebuilt Ford starters have an intermittent problem where the starter case was painted before the "guts" were installed. Drilling out a number of rivets that hold ground connections to the starter frame and then tapping the holes and putting in machine screws can help a lot. It did for me...my starter had an intermittent throw-out coil due to a ground through paint. Tell us more about what your engine does and doesn't do and I'm sure will get more accurate responses. |
| | | RE: Hot car don't start -- Turin, 07/15/2002
It trys to turn over, but very slowly. I've had the same problems on other cars when the alternator starts to die. when it cools down it starts right back up like nothing ever happened. Kinda as if the battery has magically recharged itself. |
| | | | RE: Hot car don't start -- John, 07/15/2002
The engine is just "tight" after it heats up and the starter can't handle it. Clean electrical connections and a good battery will make it work, though never well. Maybe an after-market gear reduction starter would be better. I sort of want to try one. Anybody out there try one, and what was the outcome? |
| | | | | RE: Hot car don't start -- Turin, 07/16/2002
It's acting as if all the juice beeing generated by the alternator is going somewear else. Could it be the 100watt stereo I am running or a short in my fried air conditioner? on restart it makes a WAA...Wuu.....Wu...then nada. |
| | | | | | RE: Hot car don't start -- Travis Miller, 07/16/2002
I had a problem similar to yours and cured it with all new battery cables including the one from the solenoid to the starter. I am not talking about cheap cables from a discount store. Get some real cables from a reputable electric shop that rebuilds starters and alternators. Those guys see problems like this all the time. They know what causes the problems. Talk to them. It cost me $17 for a local shop to test my system and tell me that the battery cables were bad. I bought the cables from them, put them on myself, and have had no problems since. |
| | | | | | RE: Hot car don't start -- rick, 07/22/2002
this is a common problem with the fe's. check your ignition timing, they don't like much initial on a hot start. i can only run 4 deg. or i have the same problem. it doesn't take much of that and your starter will go south. i just put another new one on mine(tore the nose cone right off it.) as another poster said, i will say it again, GOOD battery cables, i replaced ALL of them on mine, it made a world of difference. ford really cheaped-out when they put cables on their vehicles. i had mine custom made at a local implement dealer. |
| | RE: Hot car don't start -- ANDY, 07/16/2002
Heat soak into a dodgy coil can also cause greif. Just something else to think about if it is turning over. |
| | | RE: Hot car don't start -- Turin, 07/17/2002
just changed the coil this afternoon. I'll see what happens. |
| Have any of you guys running high oil pressure... -- Dan Davis, 07/13/2002
...FEs (I have heard they like 80+#s) had any problem with distributor gears? I have checked everything that can be checked (front cam bearing, oil flow, gear height & mesh, dist end play), but I cannot find a cause for an eaten gear (less than two hours run time).
I have 100+ #s of OP at cold startup w/10W30, coming down to 60#s at warm idle. I am thinking that I need to trash that high pressure OP spring and go back to the OEM spring.
Any thoughts?
Thanks, Dan |
| | RE: Have any of you guys running high oil pressure... -- John, 07/13/2002
Yep, a HV pump is sufficient. I had 145 psi at cold idle with 10W30 with one of those pumps. As for the dist gear, is the oil passage feeding the bottom end of the distributer clear and getting oil? You didn't put to long a bolt in the left lower cam retaining plate, did you? Also, a mallory dist has a loose gear to shaft problem. Also, make sure it isn't a truck block with a car dist in it....the hole is too large and a bushing is required. And the busshing must be cross drilled fro oil to get to the dist/cam gears. |
| | | Actually this is a 460, but I know that FEs liked -- Dan Davis, 07/13/2002
the hiogh OP. That's why I asked here about the gear wear -- excessive or not. Your engine with 145psi did not have a gear problem I take it.
I used an OEM gear on a mild flat tappet cam with a Ford dist. Dimensionally it is correct, both endplay and gear depth. It appears to be getting oil. When i spin the pump with a primer there is oil in the area and the gear is not discolored from heat, only worn away.
Thanks for the help! Dan |
| | | | RE: Actually this is a 460, but I know that FEs liked -- John, 07/13/2002
One other thing....dist gears are presumeably case hardened. That means that if the gear was to slowly wear for some reason, no-one would notice till it wore through the case hardening and then all of a sudden, it's worn away. If you used an old gear which did not "perfectly match" with a new cam, then the "normal" break-in wear could have gotten through the case-hardening. There may not be anything actually wrong with your engine that a new dist gear won't fix. I did have a problem with a mallory dist gear, but it was shearing of the split pin. A larger hole with two nested split pins solved the problem. You might want to do a search in this forum for "oil pressure". It's been a topic of discussion on and off and there's a lot of good info here, though I remember nothing exactly like your problem. |
| | RE: Have any of you guys running high oil pressure... -- ford406, 07/14/2002
Dan, Ford had trouble with dist. gears on 460's back in the late 80's early 90's. Had a new van that got less than 400 miles before it quit running. Bad dist. gear and it took the cam with it. They fixed it on warr. |
| | Two things... -- Kevin66, 07/14/2002
I've seen occasional evidence of gears wearing badly when a block has been decked and/or cylinder heads cut, and/or intake manifold milled to fit same. The net effect can be that the intake manifold now sits 'lower' on the engine, and the distance from the distributor hole down to the block casting where the distributor pilot hole is, has been shortened. If you've resorted to using silicone on the end rails because the stock cork/rubber end seals WON'T fit or stay in place, it's usually because of this. When the distributor clamp is tightened, it pushes the distributor down deeper, and the gear drags agains the top of the pilot casting. Since the cam is attempting to turn the distributor, the resistance to rotation causes rapid, excessive tooth wear. Check the bottom surface of your distributor gear for evidence of this rubbing (shiny spots). Whenever installing a new cam, always use a new distributor gear. They mate in to each other, not unlike the way ring & pinions or transmission gears & clusters do. Liberally coat both the cam and distributor gear teeth with the same break-in lube used on the rest of the cam, to give it the best chance for a long life. |
| | | Thanks all. I'll install a new gear & give it a go -- Dan Davis, 07/14/2002
nm |
| Removing Engine Varnish -- Ken Cenicola, 07/13/2002
What is the best product for breaking down and removing the black varnish buildup on the internal parts of an engine when doing a rebuild. The rocker arm oil baffles etc., are really tough to get clean. Brasso works better than Gunk or Laqcuer thinner or mineral spirits but it's still a bear. Any suggestions?
Ken |
| | Best in the world if you can find it -- Greg, 07/13/2002
Is a parts dip/cleaner called Mckays parts cleaner. It used to be sold by supershops a few years ago, it was 14.99 a gallon but worked exactly as advertised. Best part is that it never gets weak, I used a gallon for nearly two years. Wish I could buy more but cant find a distributor locally. greg |
| | I have heard that. . . -- Nathan, 07/16/2002
I have heard that mueriatic (sp?) acid works very well and that you can buy it from swimming pool supply companies. . . I'm going to try it. . . |
| | | do not use acid on engine parts -- doug bolden, 07/17/2002
Some yrs. back . The Grummond bus manufacturer, Had axles falling out of them. Well quallity control said U bolts were breaking on axle. Following the bus through manufacture it was noted that befor paint they acid washed the Alluminium body. And it was this acid mist that got on the hardened bolts.Causing the failier, do to stress risers from acid Think what this will do to rods,or block.
oven cleaner is also good except on alluminium it turns it black or dark ,does remove grease but will need bead blasting after . |
| | RE: Removing Engine Varnish -- Louie, 07/16/2002
Ez-off oven cleaner |
| | RE: Removing Engine Varnish -- Ken Cenicola, 07/23/2002
Wow, the Easy Off did the trick. I left it on overnight and then in the morning sprayed on some more and it all came right off with the green side of a scour sponge.
Thanks! |
| Manifolds -- mike, 07/13/2002
I have an intake ...# C80E-9425-C,...That I thought was off a 428 CJ?....Also exhaust manifold..# C80E-9430-A (right side) that I also thought was a 428 CJ?.....But lately have been told that neither were on 428's? Does anyone know what these manifolds were on?? Thanks in advance |
| | Look here: -- Royce Peterson, 07/13/2002
www.428cobrajet.com
Royce Peterson
|
| | | RE: Look here: -- mike, 07/14/2002
Royce, Thank you..That confirmed what I had thought all along...Some one told me that I didn't have the 428cj exhaust manifolds cause they are "huge"..and that the right side would end below my starter...mine ends above the starter if i remember correctly? Whats up with that?.... Thanks again |
| | | | RE: Look here: -- Royce Peterson, 07/14/2002
Mike,
Sounds like you have 390GT manifolds. What is the diameter of your exhaust "H" pipe? The 390GT pipe is smaller.
Royce Peterson |
| | | | | RE: Look here: -- mike, 07/14/2002
Royce, "H" pipe?......Cross-over pipe? There is none. |
| | | | | | Headpipe diameter -- Royce Peterson, 07/14/2002
OK, What is the diameter of the pipe where it enters the manifold?
Royce Peterson |
| | | | | | | RE: Headpipe diameter -- mike, 07/15/2002
Royce, From what I can tell...It looks like the pipe coming out of the manifold appears to be about 2".... with the end of the manifold .(.ahead of the flange )looks to be 2 1/2"-2 3/4" |
| | Manifold photos -- Bob, 07/14/2002
I have photos of both manifolds on my site.
Click to enlarge any photo. |
| | | RE: Manifold photos -- mike, 07/14/2002
Royce, I'll measure the pipe tomorrow morning....So if the #'s say 428cj...but it sounds to you to be a 390?...How can that be? Bob....where is your site? thanks guys |
| | | | | RE: Manifold photos -- mike, 07/15/2002
Bob, Nice site.thank you...............my manifolds "look" more like the 428's...Mine have the "top" bolt in the last cylinders....unlike the 390GT's that don't appear to have em |
| | | | | RE: Manifold photos -- hawkrod, 07/17/2002
hey Bob, i love the pics on your site but could you add casting numbers? (maybe i missed it?). also in looking at the GT 390 manifolds you only show one style and there are actually 2 styles and at least three sets of casting numbers. the 66 fairlane manifolds are different than the 67 and newer on the drivers side rear port. thanks, hawkrod |
| Info wanted on Edlebrock "X F66" cross ram -- Nathan, 07/12/2002
Hello All, I have a chance to aquire an Edelbrock cross ram style intake for my FE project. Do any of you have experience with one; especially a "X F66"? Any and all information on this intake or cross rams on FEs in general is much appreciated. Thanks, Nathan |
| | A picture rotates thru the header at FordFE.com -- 68Fairlane390, 07/12/2002
The picture of a dual-paxton equipped Cobra is of the Edelbrock crossram.
Did you ask at the site where someone offered it to you in trade?
http://www.network54.com/hide/forum/74182
I think crossrams come up pretty regularly there, do a search there and I think you'll come up with a lot of info. |
| | | RE: Picture at FordFE.com - caption required -- Kevin66, 07/14/2002
It occured to me, when I saw the picture of this bi-turbo application the first time, that the caption should be...
"The only known way to counteract reversion in this Manifold"
...blow it in, and keep it in!
Sorry...just a little humor! |
| | | RE: Here's a picture -- Nathan, 07/12/2002
Bob,
Thanks, I had seen the picture before but I wasn't sure if it was the same manifold. I contacted Edelbrock and they gave me some info, but not all that much. What have you read on these? I would greatly appreciate it if you pointed me towards some more info.
Thanks, Nathan |
| | | | Here's what i've copied from various forum's -- Bob, 07/12/2002
over the last year. Note that the MT cross ram has the two plenums connected while the Edelbrock does not. The Edelbrock is not recommended due to this as the old PI maniold makes more power.
Crossram Setup
I have a '56 T-Bird with a .040 over 428. It has Edelbrock heads, .520 lift 232@.050 solid Engle cam, 2 inch custom headers, and the before mentioned X-Ram. The manifold has two 1850 600 CFM Holley carbs. Had to put 50cc accelerator pumps to get rid of a huge bog, I assume from the plenums being so large and the signal to the carbs being weak. Shortening and quickening the advance in the distributor helped a lot. Havn't noticed a lean condition. The car isn't really a racer. It's a pro-streeter with 13X31's tucked under the back. Its for go'n to church on Sunday. My Mustang with the 427(454) is the serious car in the family.
Power Ram on my 428 powered '56 T-Bird for a while now. It's really cool looking, and works well from about 3000 to 5500 rpm. Then it falls off pretty hard. Also I experience spark "scatter" about 5000+ rpm I'm assuming because of the long distributor gizmo and the high pressure oil pump I'm running. Took a little time to get the carbs to like street situations. I wouldn't consider taking it off, as the reactions of folks seeing those carbs and the distributor above the fenders are priceless!
I'm running Holley 1850 600 cfm vacuum secondary carbs. The first problem I had was with a HUGE flat spot off idle. After much monkey'n with squirters, pump cams, power valves 'n stuff, I ended up with 50cc pumps, yellow cams, and 3.5 valves. I'm assuming the flat spot was a combination of two very large plenums and a very weak signal to the carbs off idle. I also shortened the mechanical advance in the distributor to 16 degrees, and set the initial to 20 for a total of 36. This also helped the throttle response a lot. Sometimes its hard to crank, but I now have that ironed out. Hope this helps anyone who runs this combo. Also, this manifold set-up doesn't appear big cam friendly.
MC Steiny: The M/T has the plenums connected. This is very important for the street to help balance the pulses. The guys that used it before me had it on a puller truck with double pumpers that made a lot of horsepower. I would use them with vacuum secondary carbs. Holley makes a vacuum balance kit between carbs for them, and I highly recommend that to anyone using this manifold.
As I understand, it does make a lot of horsepower in the 3-4000 rpm power range. Because of the long runners, it starts producing reverse pulses in the higher rpm range, and actually starts over-filling, and pulsing back up the runners, and sometimes produces a little cloud above the carb. Don't laugh!...and don't light a match to check it out either! I suppose SOMEONE, along the way, who is pretty smart, has done some testing with them, and couldn't get them to set the world on fire. It seems to me though, that with more vacuum balance tubes added to the manifold to smooth the pulses out even more, and two not too big vacuum secondary carbs that are balanced, you could get it to work with some cam and timing work. You might even help it by playing with the runners themselves. Nothing looks more menacing than that big cross-ram under the hood though.
|
| | | | | Bob, could you please clarify. . . -- Nathan, 07/13/2002
Bob,
Thank you very much for the info. However, I need to ask you to clarify things just a little: It is hard to tell when you are talking, and which post is which. Is everything typed below the "MC Steiny" written about the Edelbrock or the MT?
Do you know anything about the "vacume balance tubes" that are mentioned and supposedly made by Holley? Also, HOW does the PI intake make more power? Is it's curve broader, or does it actually make more peak power? I love the looks of the cross ram, but obviously I don't want to put a pos on my engine. . .
Thanks, Nathan |
| | | | | | Also Bob. . . -- Nathan, 07/13/2002
Bob,
I was reading the archives of teh FE Forum and noticed your posts concerning the cross rams: Have you tried yours, or did you decide against it? I am curious how it ended up working for you.
Thanks, Nathan |
| | | | | | | RE: Also Bob. . . -- Bob, 07/13/2002
I haven;'t trried mine yet. I will use it as I've had it for almost thirty years and I too love the way it looks.
I will be outting it on the 7 Litre as soon as I can get "a round tuit"
None of that was written by me. And as I recall it was several discussions about the MT manifold. I know of no one using the Edelbrock as they just don't run right.
The runners are too small for high RPM power so the PI makes more peak power. The boat guys loved the great med range power and I am considering putting it on a truck where high RPM is not planned. Ought to make a F-350 dually real "interesting" with it on a 0.030 over 410. |
| | | | | | | | Thanks Bob. . . -- Nathan, 07/13/2002
Bob,
Thank you very much for all of your help. I have been trying to avoid it, but I think i will ask the guys on the FE Forum. I've been trying to avoid it because I think that they all think me a fool. . . Anyway, thanks! |
| | | | | RE: Here's what i've copied from various forum's -- Robert, 07/18/2002
Aloha again, I was one of the fellows involved in that earlier discussion regarding the M/T cross ram intake. The Story: 10 years plus ago I'd bought a big neat looking intake. It had M/T cast into it and not much else. As I got more into cars, I found out it was for an FE, and it was missing the rest of the critical parts. I eventually bought a second and slightly different M/T "Power Ram" marked cross ram, with the accompanying part number also cast in. The biggest difference is the first manifold has four individual ports beneath the carb, while the latest one has an open plenum design. Fortunately, the second manifold also came with a modified distributor and the block adapter. I reverse engineered a drive mechanism off the cam using an old distributor shaft, and have an ARP drive shaft for insurance. Oddly, a couple weeks later, a friend told me he knew somebody selling another cross ram locally, so I went over, saw he had an Edelbrock with a pair of tricked out 660s, and after picking his brain for a couple of hours and parting with $300-350, had another cross ram. What are the chances, in Hawaii after 30 plus years... Anyhow, he used to race the Edelbrock on his 428 69 Mustang coupe, and said the carbs helped a lot, as up to then, it wasn't a good runner. I'll have some more feedback later, as I'm still building my 454FE. I've now got the Edelbrock heads and Erson roller rockers (5 sets on the shelf at Summit when I got mine, and they aren't anodized like they were pictured in the past). Cam selection is next. Let me know if I can be of help, or if you'd like I can put you in contact with me friend I got the Edelbrock cross ram from. Robert
PS: I'm still looking for another M/T aluminum carb scoop for my cross ram setup. I believe this was originally for marine applications. I've also got a few plain aluminum ones. Aloha. |
| | | | | | Aloha, Robert. . . -- Nathan, 07/19/2002
Robert,
Thanks very much for the info. I would greatly appreciate you putting me in touch with the fellow that used to run the Edelbrock X F-66. Please e-mail me (just put the cursor over my name for the address) his name and e-mail.
Thanks, Nathan |
| | | | | | Robert, if you get a chance. . . -- Nathan, 07/19/2002
Robert,
If you get a chance, please read my latest post. I need a little help in the from of a few measurements from the intake and an FE.
Thanks, Nathan |
| FPA Tri-Y sizing? -- 68Fairlane390, 07/11/2002
What size tubes are on FPA Tri-Y headers for the Edelbrock 14-bolt GT head?
Their site doesn't give sizing information.
Thank you. |
| fe rebuilder in southeast mich -- john gessler, 07/10/2002
i am looking for a good rebuilder of fe motors in southeast michigan. someone that knows these motors. any help? THANKS, JOHN |
| FE Heads Finely Finished -- Ray, 07/10/2002
I finely found some time to finish them, check them out @ www.puudog.com
|
| | RE: FE Heads Finely Finished -- Ray, 07/10/2002
Valve size is 2.190 x 1.740 I had to cut exhausd down to fit. 428 should be around the 700 HP range with hydraulic roller, I think w/ the cam that I'am using it should be very streetable.
|
| 428 crankshaft polish -- Paul Garvin, 07/10/2002
I just picked up a 428 IU crankshaft for the motor I am planning on eventually putting in my 69 Cougar convertible. The crank is in good shape but has some surface rust on the journals from sitting. It has never been turned, and I'd like to try to polish it out before I resort to having it cut .010. Is this something that can be done in the home workshop, or is this best left to a machine shop? Also, where can I go to get the polishing paper? I plan on having it balanced along with the rest of the reciprocating assembly after I get the block sonic checked to determine max bore for piston selection. So would it just be simpler to wait and have the machine shop just cut, polish and balance all at the same time? I dont like the rust on the journals, and it may be some time before I get this whole thing together and to a machinist. I'd like to clean up the rust and then coat and seal the crank while I wait. Any thoughts? Paul G. |
| | RE: 428 crankshaft polish -- Royce Peterson, 07/10/2002
Take it to your machinist and let him decide. It probably needs to be turned down. The crankshaft needs to be right if you expectthe engine to last. You are going to spend a lot of time and money by the time you first turn the key and get to drive the car. Do everything right once and you will not have to do any of it twice.
Royce Peterson |
| | | RE: 428 crankshaft polish...two more ??'s -- Paul Garvin, 07/10/2002
Thanks Royce, I plan to have the crank turned, but not for some time. I still have a bunch of work to do on the block, and I am not going to be ready to start reassembly for some time. I am planning on doing the engine as a winter project and hope to have the whole car ready for the CCNJ nats here in NJ next June. I agree with you about doing it right!! This is my first FE build and I want to take my time and really enjoy it. I am concerned about the rust getting worse between now and when I am ready to have the crank prepped. And I don't want to have it turned now and sit until I am ready to reassemble. Is there something I can coat it with to keep the rust from getting worse, or should I have the crank turned down now and keep it in a sealed package until I have the rest of the assembly ready for balancing. Also, what if any special concerns should I have in relation to putting an FE in a 69 Cougar Convertible. I already have a small block C6 in it so the big block C6 should work as well. I have the big block radiator in it already, and I have th big block fan in it already. The engine came complete, out of my old F-250. It is a reinforced web D4TE block that I am getting ready to have soniced to find out what the bore capacity is. What other things will I need? As always, Thanks for all the great info, Paul |
| | | | RE: 428 crankshaft polish...two more ??'s -- Royce Peterson, 07/10/2002
Paul, You will need the big block 3 piece motor mounts for each side and the front springs might need to be stiffer unless you do something to lighten the FE. The truck heads will need to be drilled for the Cougar / Mustang bolt pattern and you will need GT exhaust manifolds or CJ exhaust manifolds or headers.
Coat the crank journals with moly axle grease and put it into a couple of garbage bags then put it in a place that is dry and not subject to flooding.
Royce Peterson |
| | | | | RE: 428 crankshaft polish...two more ??'s -- Paul Garvin, 07/11/2002
Royce, The heads are C7AE auto heads from a previous top end rebuild on the 390. I plan to use an aluminum intake ( I'd really like to do dual quads because they look so great on an FE cougar, but I wonder how they would perform versus a good 4V and a Blue thunder or E-bok RPM ) and headers to lighten up the front end as well as the big block front springs. I already have a set of big block rear springs waiting to go in. I was told that the convertible 69's all had the same frame mounts for the engine because of the need to sit the engine lower regardless of small or big block. Is this correct? or are you referring to the engine motor mounts that attach to the frame mounts? Thanks again, Paul |
| | | | | | Frame / Insulator and block brackets -- Royce Peterson, 07/11/2002
I had to look that one up in my Mercury Parts Catalog. It does call for the use of small block frame mounts C8ZZ 6028-B (R/H) and D0ZZ 6029-B (L/H) with insulators D1ZZ 6038-A (both sides) and block plates C8ZZ 6030-A (R/H) and C8ZZ 6031-A (L/H) for the 390 and 428 engines. Note that the frame mounts and insulator part numbers are superceded, the original poart numbers were undoubtedly C8ZZ for everything.
Royce Peterson
|
| | | | Wrapped in plastic! -- pop428, 07/10/2002
Paul, your crank should come back from the machine shop wrapped in a plastic wrap like Glad wrap and be coated in a grease or lubricant to stop it from surface rusting! If it doesn't you could always get the crank machined and then coat it with a good machine grease and wrap it in glad wrap yourself and put it on the shelf until you are ready to prepare for the install! I too am in the process of my first FE rebuild as well and this is how My engine build has my crank sitting right now along with my heads. Great feeling isn't knowing you are build up one of the best Engines ever build (IMO).
Peter 1969 Mach 1 428 cjr WT 7034 Green |
|