Skip Navigation Links.
| looking for 390 cam that works! -- carlos, 04/18/2003
Hey guys, I could really use some help. I have had a migraine for days trying to find a great cam for my "390 freshen up project". The cam i had on motor for about 700 miles was a dual pattern hyd cam with these specs; dur @ 50 214/224 sae dur 292/302 cam lift 295/310 valve lift 510/536 with lobe centers 107/117 all intake/exhaust info. I think cam lobes went down so dont want to take a chance. Some cam company personnel say dual pattern are better, some say single pattern. They said not to go below 112 on lobe seperation and to not go over 220 on duration @ 50. I checked out some of your info on this ford link, and see that a few have chosen comp cams 280h cam. Is this a good choice ? I was recommended comp cams 270h. Others have suggested Crane cams dual pattern profiles. I've used Isky cams, speed pro and now this dual pattern. I have been happy with none of them. It seems like the more $ i spend, the slower and less fun my car is. I have a 390 bored 40 over, 2400-2800 stall, edelbrock performer intake, hooker super comp headers, ford 9" rear, don't have gears yet but soon. I have a C6 automatic with a shift kit. Heads are C7AE-A which will get mild port/polish. I want a nice rough, but not exaggerated idle with a broad rpm range not to exceed 6000. I want a snappy response off the line to end of powerband. SOMEONE PLEASE HELP! |
| 390 fe -- Gary Goblirsch, 04/17/2003
I own 1964 Galaie 500XL. The engine was frozen tight so I did a rebuild with a 1965 390 .030 overbore. I believe it has 352 heads .The crank is from the 1965.My question is did I mess up with the 352 heads? regarding dissplacement.What would you sugest I do because the engine has a bad knock Do i still use the 352 heads?How do I know if the heads are from a 352 motor. Thanks |
| 428 Hydraulic Roller Camshaft -- Mark, 04/17/2003
Anyone with experience running a HRC in their FE? What kind of HP do you get and what is the RPM range? |
| | RE: 428 Hydraulic Roller Camshaft -- Wes Adams, 04/29/2003
Im running a soild roller cam in my 428CJ. 11to1 speed pros, F-427 intake, Holley HP750 DP, comp cams roller rockers, and some other goodies. It makes 475- 500 hp at 5,600 rpm and 550 foot pounds. |
| | I have the smaller Crane Hyd roller cam -- Walker, 04/29/2003
I have no idea what my power is as I've never dyno'ed it.
The combo is a bored/stroked 390 with edelbrock heads, M/T crossram with dual 600's a d FPA tri-y headers.
The crossram is a midrange intake, the cam is a midrange cam, the FPA tri-Y's are a midrange set of headers.
As I said, I haven't had it dyno'd, but the C6 leaves rubber at 1, 1-2, and 2-3. Seat of the pants-wise, I'm happy.
DO NOT expect to rev much past 5000 rpm with the hyd roller lifters though unless you invest a lot more than I did in lightweight valvetrain components.
But for a street driven car, it all works together great.
|
| Are Edlebrocks heads that much better -- Mike, 04/16/2003
I have a 69 mach 1 that has a stock 428 cj in it. I am going to pull it and put it on the stand and put a built 428 in it. I have some C6AE-R's that i would run. I am just wondering i assume it would probably cost me close to 400-500 bucks or so to get them rebuilt with new seats and cut for cj valves. I do have some new Cj valves so i am just wondering instead of spending that much to rebuild C6AE-R's should i just go with some edlebrocks. They are only 450 a piece bare, I get more hp, can handle higher compression easier,and since i have valves all i will need is to lap the valves right? They are lighter too. Do the edlebrocks flow that much better? |
| | RE: Are Edlebrocks heads that much better -- Gerry Proctor, 04/17/2003
They do flow much better than either garden variety or CJ heads. The Edelbrocks are based upon medium risers while the CJ and other passenger car heads are a low riser port. The obvious benefits are that they are lighter, flow better, handle higher compression ratios, and have a better chamber design. As to whether those things are significant enough to outweigh the cost or give you a high enough return on your investment just depends on your individual situation. Higher lift cams and stiff rear gears will bring out the difference with the extended rpm range and better breathing but it's also not real hard to make over 400 hp with iron heads. Port flow is not one of the FEs problems.
With the bare heads, yes you can just clean up the heads and use your valves but you're still going to need the expertise of a machine shop since the valve spring heights have to (or should) be set. While not as expensive as completely going through your C6AE heads, it's not free. |
| | RE: Are Edlebrocks heads that much better -- Charlie, 04/17/2003
Another way to look at it is a good set of cj heads can run $400 to $600, plus $50 shipping if you don't find any thing local. New springs and a good set of ss valves $200-$300 depending on source and app. If the heads require a machine shop, and they usualy do can run as high as $350. Start adding it up and before long the edl heads are looking better and better. I have a set of cjs c8oen on a 428 in a 68 mustang and a set of edls on my 67 mustang w a nonoriginal 428. In the 67 I can take my dad in the 1/4, but its also minus all smog equipment and had a dig. ignition system. The race has allways been close, not sure what actual 1/4 mile time we are running. If its original, stick with the iron, ifts for hp go for the edls and leave the good iron for the restoration guys Charlie |
| Hedders....for '68 Cougar w/ 390 & C-6 -- Chuck, 04/16/2003
I need some ASAP!
Any recommendations with a good price range?
Thanx! |
| | RE: Hedders....for '68 Cougar w/ 390 & C-6 -- Martin Micheelsen, 04/17/2003
Try using the search function above and you will find an abundance of advice re. headers. |
| 428 initial timing optimal?? -- Tim, 04/16/2003
Hi guys just broke in my engine ( cam ) the other day and am now about to tweak it a little. Carb set up and timing
I have set the initial to 14 deg and the advance stop on my MSD billet is the blue advance stop bushing giving 21 deg (springs 1 Blue and 1 Light silver) looking at 35 total in b4 3000 rpm
Q) How do I go about determining what is really the best or optimal initial timing and also what determines what the idle rpm will be?? I have the edelbrock RPM package less the carb went for a Holley 850
Tim |
| | You have left out a few things -- james, 04/16/2003
We need to know about the cam specs and the type of tranny. If you are running an automatic then your idle is important. If you are running a standard then it is not as crucial. If you are running an automatic with a cam over about 223 degress of duration without a stall converter then you will need to play with it, like I did, until you get it to where you can live with it.
A notable mention is that the FE engines love a lot of timing. Best rule of thumb is after you have wieghted the distributor to the prove standards that you have mentioned is to keep advancing the intitial timing until it starts to ping a little under acceleration then back it off in tiny increments until it quits and that is concidered optimal. |
| | | RE: You have left out a few things -- Tim, 04/16/2003
Hi James Thanks for the quick reply I have the edelbrock RPM HYD. cam and I am using a TKO 5 speed std. in a cobra kitcar..relatively light at 2400#'s 3.73 gears
cam specs are.......
Duration at .004 Lift: Intake 296° Exhaust 296° Centerlines Duration at .050 Lift: Intake 236° Exhaust 236° Lobe Separation: 108° Lift at Cam: Intake .325 Exhaust .325 Intake Centerline: 103° Lift at Valve: Intake .572 Exhaust .572 Timing at .050 Lift: Open Close Intake 15° BTDC 41° ABDC Exhaust 51° BBDC 5° ATDC
from the Edelbrock site
Heres what I have read in the past...rule of thumb..."never less than 10 deg advance or more than 20." Also many using the aluminum heads are running much less than the 34-38 total we are used to seeing on the FE.
Good to ask as I am sure there are many out there with similar setups..
Thanks for the advice
Tim
|
| | | | Now that you have the distributor right.. -- james, 04/16/2003
It is time to go to work on the carberator. What brand and cfm size is it? The reason that I am asking is that many a mighty FE has been short change a long life expectancy by not calibrating the carberator to match the cam. Low vacumm conditions caused by long duration cams will cause a rich condition that you will not be able to cure with jet changes and idle screw adjuments no matter how hard you try. You will be changing plugs a lot and noticing that some plugs are more fouled than others. This rich condition can wash rings and prevent a good set of rings from ever seating properly. A few folks that know there stuff will take your carberator and do things like drill .125 diamiter holes in the butterflies and use a smaller rated power valve (if it is a Holley) to cure it. I just went through this with my 428 CJ. I had a Edelbrock 750 that tried everything to snap it out of the plug changing blues with. I took the vacumm readings and changed the needle and seat to match the chart that come with the carberator but nothing fixed it until I went back with the original Holley with the modifications already mentioned. The reason that a lower inch gram power valve is used is that it will not come on dribbling fuel into the intake to foul plugs when it is not needed. Instead, it will come on at a lower vacumm to match the cam. I know...I wrote a book but I just sleighed that dragon and I am still basking in the glory of it. Good luck
How many miles have you put on it?
Have you done a plug check?
Lumpy cams have |
| | | | | RE: Now that you have the distributor right.. -- Tim, 04/16/2003
Hi James
I have the Holley 850 Sq Flange Mechanical secondaries a 4150
It comes with a baseline 6.5" power valve
Today double checking my timing I had the idle about 900 to 1000 rpm. Without playing with my idle air mixture screws I had 13 to 14 inches vacuum.
Power valves should be 1 to 2 " below the idle vacuum and I think I have that easy.
My baseline jetting is (F) 80 and (R) 78
I have only just broken in the cam and done one oil change. I have not looked at the plugs
Would like to set the idle air mixture screws using my vac gauge looking for optimum idle vac.
Oh yeah I had 36 degrees all in by 2900 rpm
An email from Edelbrock said
"I would set the idle to around 750-850 RPM."
"Anything over 1000 RPM would be to high. Also timing around 12-14 degrees BTDC with a total of 34-36 all in @ 3000 RPM. "
Tim
part of the reason it seems rich to me James is that the dang sidepipes outlet is under my nose sitting in the car!! LOL Can't help but smell the exhaust though it is a tad "fat"
TY for the help...appreciate all I can get |
| | | | | RE: Now that you have the distributor right.. -- Bob P., 04/23/2006
Did anyone ever have trouble with the plastic floats in the Holley Carbs. Bought a new carb off Jegs, Runs good for awhile then the secondaries stick. I take it apart inspect everything put back together and the same thing happens. Just trook a brass float out of an old holley and put it in. Wondering if that will help? |
| | | | | | Sorry to say, but both types of floats have their problems. [n/m] -- Mr F, 04/23/2006
n/m |
| | Initial timing is irrelevant. -- Gerry Proctor, 04/24/2006
It is or will be whatever it comes out to be once you set the total.
I know it seems contrary to everything you're heard or read but it's time to expand your horizons.
First, there is no magic one size fits all initial timing number. You want 10-12 degrees just to get the car started and as a baseline. Once the engine is running satisfactorily, you can start tuning the ignition curve and total. The best way is on the track but you can do it from the seat or your pants and by ear. Optimally, you'd want to bump the total timing to the point where performance falls off, then back it down a couple of degrees. Much easier to do on the track since you have a timeslip with a MPH that you can reference.
In your case, suppose that you find that the engine makes the best power with 36 degrees total and you have a 21 degree limiter in it. That gives you an initial timing of 15 degrees. If the car ran best with 41 degrees, your initial ends up at 20 degrees. If you were to set the initial at 10-12 degrees, then you'd have to work the total with just the bushing and you may not be able to get to optimal with just a bushing. So, you can see that you want to work it from the total timing, not the initial.
It probably goes without saying that to do it right and come up with the optimum takes some time. Especially in light of trying to work the centrifugal rate into it.
Get the ignition timing sorted out before you start working the fuel curve. Ignition will have a lot more to do with how the car runs than how well the fuel curve is matched to the engine.
Holleys do run fat out of the box. It's a fact of life. You'll want to work the idle circuit before anything else. The idle circuit contributes to all the other fuel curves so whatever you do to tune the idle circuit will cascade. You'll very likely need to put a restrictor in the idle fuel feed circuit. This is usually a piece of .015" wire in the channel. Google it and you'll find plenty of online instructions on how to do this. It's pretty simple and make a big difference in eliminating or reducing the nausiatingly rich idle. Most of the time, this is about all you'll have to do to a Holley. You'll probably find the other circuits will fall nicely in line.
One thing about any carburetor and idle speed...if the idle is too high you will expose the transition slot. The transition circuit is designed to get the carb from the idle circuit to the main circuit smoothly. Yes, the accelerator pump play a part in this as well. But, if you have the primary throttle blades open too far, you will uncover this slot right above the throttle blades. Once you do this, you'll have this circuit dumping fuel at idle, which will give you a very fat idle. You avoid this by not having the idle higher than it needs to be. You can also crack the secondary a bit or if necessary you can drill air bleeds into the primary throttle blades. |
| 390 FE Motor Mounts.... -- Chuck, 04/15/2003
Sounds like a repeating question...but I need a good opinion.
I recently got a '68 XR-7 with a 390, but was originally a 302 car. Me and my friend noticed the rubber on the mounts are blown. A mustang "expert" told me to go with "steel" mounts, but shouldn't some replacement rubber ones get me by? All the steel ones I've found are expensive! Maybe somebody know where to get them cheaper?
Thanx! |
| Tremec TKO in '69 Shelby GT-500 -- Mark, 04/15/2003
Hello FE Gearheads, I am prepping my Shelby for FORD's 100 year party and am curious to know if any of you have put a TREMEC TKO into a '1969 FE Mustang?
Also, does anyone have a 427 medium or high riser standard bore block for sale? I am in NOR CA. |
| | RE: Tremec TKO in '69 Shelby GT-500 -- Robert Twine, 04/16/2003
Mark, I cannot help with the mustang application, however, I took the top-loader out and installed a TKO with my 428 in a Cobra Kit. Install was easy with the adapter plate/spacer. The input shaft on the TKO is about 1/2" longer than the top-loader. Rob |
| | | I believe you have to butcher your car up -- Mike, 04/16/2003
i think you have to cut the support out of the tranny hump on your car, the crossmember welded to the floor. I would love to put one in my 69 mach but that is the reason i haven't done it. |
| | RE: Tremec TKO in '69 Shelby GT-500 -- Randy, 08/05/2003
I have a 69 428 CJ Mach 1 with a Tremec TKO, no cutting or hacking of any kind, made the car a much more enjoyable to drive. |
| | | Did you have to do any fabrication or use any 'kits'? [n/m] -- Mr F, 08/05/2003
n/m |
| | | | RE: Did you have to do any fabrication or use any 'kits'? [n/m] -- Randy, 08/06/2003
No fabrication, theres a place in Washington State, call Dark Horse Performance they have everything you need form clutch to crossmember for a dirct bolt-in, but you do need to shorten your driveline, there phone # is 425 227 7778 I hope this helps. |
| | | | | | RE: Forte's too but I never had to cut my driveshaft -- Terry, 10/12/2004
The Tremect TKO will fit in a 68 Mustang Fastback with a 390 provided some area around the original 4 spd top loader shifter hole is removed on the front and right side of the opening. That's if you install the engine and TKO as a whole unit. If you only remove the 4-spd toploader and expect the TKO to bolt right in - THINK again. Measure twice and cut once. The TKO is wider and taller. The circular shifter base is 3" in diameter and sticks up. The TKO shifter mounting stub sticks up another good 4". It's a wise idea to fill the tranny in advance. I used a cutting wheel and sheet metal nibbler to make the required hole in the floor. The final shape of the hole looks like a jig saw puzzle shape. Good luck. |
| 1970 428 Motor mounts -- John, 04/14/2003
What part number would be in the rubber for a 1970 Mustang 428?
Are the motor mounts for a convertible different than in a fastback?
John |
| | No. -- Royce Peterson, 04/15/2003
The parts catalog is wrong. It's been confusing people for over thirty years!
Royce
|
| | | C9 or D1 -- John, 04/15/2003
Thanks. I have seen several motor mounts with D1 number but what was the original partnumber found in the rubber?
John |
| | | | Rubber isolator -- Royce Peterson, 04/16/2003
The original rubber isolators had a C6 part number and were used first in the 66 Fairlane / Comet. They were revised in 1967 and 1968.
When the 429 began to be used in the 71 Cougar / Mustang the rubber isolator was revised again so the 1971 part is the correct service replacement for all 66-70 Fairlane, Cougar, Mustang, Comet with FE.
Royce |
| | | | | So for a 1970 Mustang .... -- John, 04/16/2003
So for a 1970 Mustang 428 the corect number in the rubber isolater would start with C8?
John |
| | | | | | Originally yes but... -- Royce Peterson, 04/18/2003
Most have been replaced over the years by the only available replacement part which is the D1ZZ unit. Both look identical to the other except the tiny number cast into the rubber.
Royce |
| | | | | | | More questions... -- John, 04/18/2003
Thanks. What was that original number in the rubber (C9...).
If I stumbled across a C9 set of rubber, what would a fair price bee? And a D1 set?
John |
| | | | | | | | Well.. -- Royce Peterson, 04/18/2003
I don't think there ever was a C9 marked set. The D1's sell for about $40-$50 each. Have you tried your local Ford dealer? They were in stock last time I checked.
They also are in stock at: http://www.mansfieldmustang.com or http://www.perogie.com
Royce |
| | | | | | | | | RE: Well.. some corrections... -- hawkrod, 04/19/2003
sorry royce, the fairlane body never used a mount like a mustang. the original isolator is a C7Z part, the 68/9 used an isolator with a C8Z number on it. the fairlane mounts are very different and the isolator bolts right to the block with three bolts and then there is an adapter that bolts to the frame. hawkrod |
| | | | | | | | | | RE Fairlane / Comet -- Royce Peterson, 04/19/2003
You are right Hawk, the F and C cars used a different style altogether. And yes, C8Z would have been original because there were no revisions of the part from 1968 until the 1971 revision for use of the same design isolator in the 429 Mustangs / Cougars.
Royce |
| | | | | | | | | | | Errata, Pt. 2: it was revised for '70, also. [n/m] -- Mr F, 04/19/2003
n/m |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Errata, Pt. 2: it was revised for '70 - Really? -- Royce Peterson, 04/19/2003
Were there DOZZ marked insulators then? First I have heard of that one.
Royce |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 'D0ZE-'. And even the '75 MPC's correct. :-) [n/m] -- Mr F, 04/20/2003
n/m |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Yeah, more confused,more questions!? -- John, 04/19/2003
So, if I have a 70 Mustang 428, would it have rubber isolators stamped D0 or C9? Did all 70 Mustang 428 get D0 rubber isolators or was there a change over date somewhere in the 1970 model year? If so, what was the date?
Talking about visiting my local Ford dealer!? Well, I live in Norway, Europe.... Simply put, they dont have parts for any Mustangs.
John |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Found some in my parts collection -- Royce Peterson, 04/20/2003
I dug through my FE motor mount box this morning and found an example of FE Mustang isolators marked C8ZZ, DOZA and D1ZZ. They are identical in every visible way exept the part number.
The question is really what sort of restoration you are atempting. Is this a trailered concours car to the highest MCA standards? If so then the D1ZZ would be a single point deduction at a judged show.
I have never heard of such a show overseas so my recommendation would be to buy the D1ZZ part which has some sort of improvement that is not visible to the naked eye. These are available at:
http://www.mansfieldmustang.com or http://www.perogie.com or http://www.autokrafters.com or htttp://www.dallasmustangparts.com
These vendors all ship overseas.
Good Luck!
Royce |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Picture of C8Z, DOZA and D1ZZ -- Royce Peterson, 04/20/2003
The C8ZZ is on left, DOZA center and D1ZZ right. The two on the left have been welded because they were on a race car. Can't see any difference except for the molded in number which would not be easily visible in the car.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Thanks a lot. -- John, 04/20/2003
Thanks alot. I asked because its not easy to know any (if any)difference here in Europe.
This forum is simply the best.
John |
| Mustang show -- John, 04/14/2003
Planning my holiday in US. Any big Mustang & Ford shows in September?
John |
| | | Carlisle is to late ;-( -- John, 04/14/2003
Carlisle is to late. Would be in the US the 3 first weeks in September.
Asking local clubs? Yes maybe, but arent there any big Mustang and Ford events in US in September?
John |
| | | | If you mean Ford- or Mustang-only, I can't think of any. [n/m] -- Mr F, 04/14/2003
n/m |
| | | | | Thanks [n/m] -- John, 04/14/2003
Thanks n/m |
| | Labor day weekend FORD show in Ohio. -- BOB, 04/15/2003
At National Trail raceway every laborday weekend there is a big All model Ford show thats the first weekend in Sept . |
| | | Thanks alot n/m -- John, 04/15/2003
Thanks alot n/m |
|