Skip Navigation Links.
 | Anyone know where I can get a new or rebuilt... -- Eric, 11/27/2000
harmonic balancer for a 68 390 out of a truck. Oh yea, affordable would be nice too
thanks
|
|  | RE: Anyone know where I can get a new or rebuilt... -- Richard Bouman, 11/27/2000
Try Damper Dudes in Redding, California |
| |  | RE: Anyone know where I can get a new or rebuilt... -- scott, 11/28/2000
I had Damper Dudes rebuild my balancer and they did an excellent job. I Beleive it ran about 90.00 or so |
|  | RE: Anyone know where I can get a new or rebuilt... -- geo, 11/29/2000
do you want new or used? i have a 65 390 and was able to grab a harmonic balancer out of a 74,75,76(don't exactly recall) truck (must have been a 391) - perfect fit other than the timing marks being off. They ran the FE (or to be correct, the FT) in trucks up to 76. If you don't neccesarily want a new one, go to the wreckers. geo |
 | mix and match -- john d, 11/27/2000
ok here goes. im recieving a 390 4v out of a 65 thunderbird. completely intacked. ive been told that i can put a 428 cj crank into it with no clearance problems and turn it into a 410. what compression would i be looking at with a set of edlbrock heads with a 68 cc compression chambers. also with this setup what cam should i look at. so how hairy is this thing going to be? any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.
ps its going into a 67 cougar. |
|  | RE: mix and match -- dj, 11/27/2000
The 410 was available in '66 & '67. The factory compression ratio was10.5:1 with 71.2-74.2cc combustion chambers. So with 68cc heads you will of course be making more compression. The factory rated them at 330HP@ 4600 and 444ft/lb@ 2800. My favorite cam is the stock Cobra Jet camshaft. It's fairly mild, doesn't lope, but will scream when you hit the throttle. By the way, don't believe what the factory says about horsepower. |
|  | RE: mix and match -- Will, 11/28/2000
Ed heads are more like 74-77 cc. I think they claim 72-77, but someone recently cc'd them and they came out to around 77. |
 | WANTED: FE bell housing bolt pattern -- WLT, 11/26/2000
Looking for an accurate dimensional layout of the bell housing bolt pattern in relation to the crank centerline for the FE. I have the same for the six-bolt SBF for trade. |
 | SIDEWINDER intake????? -- mark beaver, 11/25/2000
I have a FE alum. intake cast.#C7AE9425-F can anyone tell me what this intake came off of an the value???? i have pics to send if you want to see.... thanks. mark 11-25-2000 |
 | Beware of thiefs -- jgb, 11/23/2000
beware of Greg Thomas posting ads on the net using the name Prairie Pony Parts 1439 Connaught st Regina Saskatghewan Canada S4t4t1 I've been trying to get my parts or money back since August. |
 | Need engine Help -- alan zinniker, 11/20/2000
I have a 289 Automatic transmision 1968 ford mustang and want a bigger engine in it. Which Kind of an engine is available |
|  | RE: Need engine Help -- Faron Rhoads, 11/21/2000
Well since this is a FE Fourm and I have a 68 Mustang, My advice is a 390 , as FEs go its the best bang for the buck. You can build it with stock parts or go Wild, its up to your wallet, Me I like Em 671-BLOWN |
|  | 351W is probably the easiest/best HP option [n/m] -- Mr Fomoco, 11/21/2000
n/m |
|  | 351w -- Ed Foral, 11/22/2000
With the low price of stroker kits, and the huge selection of heads, you can build a 351 and make gobs of power with alot less weight and for less money than a big block, with big block cubes if you want. MM&FF magazine made 537HP @ 5900RPM by taking a FRPP crate 392 short block and adding a set of good heads. You can take the extra money you would spend on the conversion to a big block and stick it into the engine itself. Only if weight and money are not an issue should you look at the big block option. I don't think that you can beat the looks and uniqueness of an FE. 460 based engines will make more power for less money than an FE, but they are heavier yet.
Ed |
 | Heat riser -- T1M, 11/20/2000
Well, not actually the heat riser. My question has to do with the part the runs the warm air around the exhaust manifold to the heat riser. I took it off and forgot to put it back on when I replaced the head gaskets two years ago. It takes noticeably longer for the engine to warm up now. Can I simply remove the three or so bolts that hold this part on and re torque them or do I have to take off all the bolts and put them back in in the tigtening sequence? I used exhaust manifold gaskets btw. I have a 68' Galaxie with a 390 2-V. Thanks |
 | Actual 428 SCJ Horsepower -- Brian T, 11/19/2000
Since they rate 428's at 335 hp for insurance rate purposes, what is a reasonable actual horsepower rating for my car? It is a factory SCJ with cast iron exhaust manifolds and a "C7" prefix aluminum intake with factory 735 Holley. It also has a Mallory Electronic Ignition, other than that it is basically stock. |
|  | RE: Actual 428 SCJ Horsepower -- Brian, 11/19/2000
NHRA refactored the HP on these engines at 400 which is close |
|  | RE: Actual 428 SCJ Horsepower -- dj, 11/27/2000
Ford under rated the 428CJ by 100 horsepower. They rated the torque correctly however at 440/3400. |
| |  | 428 SCJ Horsepower -- Greg B, 11/28/2000
Ok I'll bite on this one. DJ where can we find the info that will support the claim of 435hp for the 428cj's Back when the CJ's were new the NHRA was factoring them at 360hp later revising it to 375hp.If the true output was 435 you can bet the Chevy boys would be crying loud and long for the Factor number to be raised |
| ![Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=3418&Reply=3350><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <b>Ford admits specs were finagled by using dyno's "B"-curve. [n/m]</b> -- <font color=#0000ff>Mr F, <i>11/28/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>n/m </blockquote>](/WebResource.axd?d=5j1V7IJBhc-qdmzmrXlobq0gFNxbOjgd7TeV-LysSEekJ7Gmtc2x9RMYHtS9EW5yU7wHEIWgz1wWu2IMG322RtthXdkInI49gjJzA4laYxsFhGCZI8wW_xoN6HxVXe4-0&t=637814653746327080) | Ford admits specs were finagled by using dyno's "B"-curve. [n/m] -- Mr F, 11/28/2000
n/m |
| |  | I'm not letting you off the hook so easy, Mr.F -- Dave Shoe, 11/28/2000
You've got some juicy info that I wanna hear, and what the heck is a "B" curve anyway (I suspect it's an alternate to the "A" curve)?
Shoe. |
| | |  | RE: I'm not letting you off the hook so easy, Mr.F -- Mr F, 11/30/2000
You've got some juicy info that I wanna hear
Well, its not all that juicy, Dave. However well-documented, anything I get is usually third-hand....its not as though I was there in '68, you know. :-)
All I know is that a former company engineer has gone on record to say that they (whoever that was) selected the lower of several figures produced by dynamometer tests. Further admissions: (a) This practice was not SOP, at the time, plus (b) It was done with the specific intent of understating horsepower.
and what the heck is a "B" curve anyway (I suspect it's an alternate to the "A" curve)?
Exactly. I'm told that typical Ford dyno results of the period included (at least) three output curves, namely the A-, B- and C-curves. These were derived from - duh! - three different methodologies, each accepted by SAE for stated ratings tho' producing dissimilar Bhp figures.
Off-hand, I forget which is which. But, for example, one curve might include the drag from bolt-on accessories, while another did not. And, while everyone involved knew that the B-curve result was always numerically lower than A-curve results, both were equally legitimate. That's how Ford got away with their creative accounting.
Hope that explains it.
Mr F |
|
| | | |  | RE: I'm not letting you off the hook so easy, Mr.F -- Dave Shoe, 11/30/2000
Mr. F,
As you probably recognize, third hand info is far more legitimate than some of the concoctions I come up with.
Thanks for the info.
Shoe.
|
| | | | |  | Sure, but you're darn good at collating disparate input. :-) [n/m] -- Mr F, 12/01/2000
n/m |
 | CobraJet Tech and Parts Pages -- John, 11/18/2000
Another good page (but not as good as this one, as it appears to be less read) is: www.p-c-net.net/~fordman/Tech-page/Tech-page.html
There is also a related "for sale" page at:
www.p-c-net.net/~fordman/wwwboard/wwwboard.html
Hope this may be of help. |
 | New ford carburator forum!!! -- Ed Jenkins, 11/18/2000
FORD carb FORUM open to any carburated FORD engine and its carb. by Ed Jenkins http://network54.com/Forum/88781
check it out, Right now I need answer guys, those with losts of carburator exprience. I know about Autolite 4100's but not much else.
|
|