These are the old FoMoCo Obsolete Forums and are being hosted by JCOConsulting.com. While you're here, check out my articles or have a look around at some of the Ford Stuff we have for sale. You might find something you can't live without.

Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2681&Reply=2681><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Casting #s</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Ryan, <i>09/08/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Ok here I go!  I finally got around and remembered to look at the casting numbers on my engine and was wondering if someone can tell me what they mean and/or do for me?  All help will be greatly appreciated!!!<br><br>Intake Manifold#: D4TE9425P2A<br>Exhaust Manifold#: D2TE9431AA<br>Carb#: D4TE RA<br>       B 4A 17<br><br>I couldn't find the one on my engine block because I didn't know where to look & it is coated in old dirt/sludge! </blockquote> Casting #s -- Ryan, 09/08/2000
Ok here I go! I finally got around and remembered to look at the casting numbers on my engine and was wondering if someone can tell me what they mean and/or do for me? All help will be greatly appreciated!!!

Intake Manifold#: D4TE9425P2A
Exhaust Manifold#: D2TE9431AA
Carb#: D4TE RA
B 4A 17

I couldn't find the one on my engine block because I didn't know where to look & it is coated in old dirt/sludge!
 They tell me its from a truck - prob. a 390 [n/m] -- Mr F, 09/09/2000
n/m
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2719&Reply=2681><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: Casting #s</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Lee, <i>09/13/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Ryan, intake and carb from a 1974 truck, exaust from a 1972 truck. Hope this helps some. Lee </blockquote> RE: Casting #s -- Lee, 09/13/2000
Ryan, intake and carb from a 1974 truck, exaust from a 1972 truck. Hope this helps some. Lee
 RE: Casting #s -- Ryan, 09/13/2000
Exhaust from a '72 eh? Hmmm?
That helps thanks a lot. I appreciate your time.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2670&Reply=2670><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Getting trans kickdown linkage to work</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Grant, <i>09/07/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Have a 390GT/CruiseOMatic/Holley 3310 750dual feed set up. Problem is I can never kick the trans into "passing gear". I've backed out screw on kick down rod linkage to where it's practically falling out. <br><br>And yet it still is too far away from carb lever to hit it.<br><br>Screw is 1" long...supplied by Holley. Looks like metric treads with a large flat but rounded edge head. Looking for similar screw...10/32 should work but starts to screw in tightly and has much smaller head.<br><br>Don't want to jury rig something...any ideas?<br><br>Grant </blockquote> Getting trans kickdown linkage to work -- Grant, 09/07/2000
Have a 390GT/CruiseOMatic/Holley 3310 750dual feed set up. Problem is I can never kick the trans into "passing gear". I've backed out screw on kick down rod linkage to where it's practically falling out.

And yet it still is too far away from carb lever to hit it.

Screw is 1" long...supplied by Holley. Looks like metric treads with a large flat but rounded edge head. Looking for similar screw...10/32 should work but starts to screw in tightly and has much smaller head.

Don't want to jury rig something...any ideas?

Grant
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2674&Reply=2670><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: Getting trans kickdown linkage to work</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Dave Shoe, <i>09/07/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>What kinda car and what year?<br><br>There were several different kickdown linkages for the FE Fairlane and Mustang.  Being specific with the model and year may help get a good answer.<br><br>Shoe. </blockquote> RE: Getting trans kickdown linkage to work -- Dave Shoe, 09/07/2000
What kinda car and what year?

There were several different kickdown linkages for the FE Fairlane and Mustang. Being specific with the model and year may help get a good answer.

Shoe.
 RE: Getting trans kickdown linkage to work -- Grant, 09/11/2000
Fixed problem...needed to move gas pedal linkage back on clamp...had too much slack! IT was one of those two person, four eyes situations where you needed to really eyeball it...
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2677&Reply=2670><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: Getting trans kickdown linkage to work</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Alan, <i>09/08/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Holley makes a kickdown linkage extension that bolts on to the end of the kickdown rod at the<br>carb end. It is about 1" to 1.5" long and should<br>take care of your problem. I put one on my 66 Galaxie many years ago when I put a 3310 on my 390. It also had a cruise-o-matic. </blockquote> RE: Getting trans kickdown linkage to work -- Alan, 09/08/2000
Holley makes a kickdown linkage extension that bolts on to the end of the kickdown rod at the
carb end. It is about 1" to 1.5" long and should
take care of your problem. I put one on my 66 Galaxie many years ago when I put a 3310 on my 390. It also had a cruise-o-matic.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2708&Reply=2670><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: Getting trans kickdown linkage to work</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Grant, <i>09/11/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Thanks for the info...fixed problem...needed to take up slack in throttle/gas pedal linkage. Clamp holding up slack was tight but after 12 years, guess it worked its way loose enough to cause not enough travel to get kickdown to work.<br><br>What a difference! Rear end breaks loose and car just bellows!<br><br>You said you had/have a similar set up in a '66 Galaxie with a CruiseO? Did you swap in a C6? Have a source for a column shifted C6 out of a 66 Galaxie. Any particulars or difficulties you experienced?<br><br>Grant </blockquote> RE: Getting trans kickdown linkage to work -- Grant, 09/11/2000
Thanks for the info...fixed problem...needed to take up slack in throttle/gas pedal linkage. Clamp holding up slack was tight but after 12 years, guess it worked its way loose enough to cause not enough travel to get kickdown to work.

What a difference! Rear end breaks loose and car just bellows!

You said you had/have a similar set up in a '66 Galaxie with a CruiseO? Did you swap in a C6? Have a source for a column shifted C6 out of a 66 Galaxie. Any particulars or difficulties you experienced?

Grant
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2711&Reply=2670><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>cruiso to C6 swap</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Alan C., <i>09/11/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Yes I did later swap in a C6. The shifter linkage and kickdown fit ok, but a C6 is longer and the trans mount location is also further back. On a 66<br>Galaxie the rear crossmember is offset, it offsets forward for a cruise-o-matic. For a C6 you turn it around and it fits for a C6. There are also extra holes to remount the emergency brake mechanism.<br>Your driveshaft may need shortened or you might<br>get by putting a shorter yoke on your rearend if<br>you have the long one now. I got a drive shaft out a 67 galaxie with a C6. In 66 you could get either<br>trans in a Galaxie, but the shift indicater still<br>said cruise-o-matic. Hope this helps.    </blockquote> cruiso to C6 swap -- Alan C., 09/11/2000
Yes I did later swap in a C6. The shifter linkage and kickdown fit ok, but a C6 is longer and the trans mount location is also further back. On a 66
Galaxie the rear crossmember is offset, it offsets forward for a cruise-o-matic. For a C6 you turn it around and it fits for a C6. There are also extra holes to remount the emergency brake mechanism.
Your driveshaft may need shortened or you might
get by putting a shorter yoke on your rearend if
you have the long one now. I got a drive shaft out a 67 galaxie with a C6. In 66 you could get either
trans in a Galaxie, but the shift indicater still
said cruise-o-matic. Hope this helps.
 RE: cruiso to C6 swap -- Grant, 09/12/2000
Thanks for the info Alan! It will sure come in handy when I do the swap. What gains did you realize from doing the swap? Are you running a high HP motor?

Grant
 1974 f-100 -- Ryan, 09/06/2000
http://www.geocities.com/bozo_1974/FordArea.html
Check it out and send me some ideas please!?
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2662&Reply=2662><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>410 pushrods or adjustable rockers</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Kent Smith, <i>09/05/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>anyone heard if there are adjustable pushrods available for a 410. My Edlerbrock alum. heads and crane cam calls for adjustable rockers and the ones from crane are on indefinite backorder.<br>thanks </blockquote> 410 pushrods or adjustable rockers -- Kent Smith, 09/05/2000
anyone heard if there are adjustable pushrods available for a 410. My Edlerbrock alum. heads and crane cam calls for adjustable rockers and the ones from crane are on indefinite backorder.
thanks
 RE: 410 pushrods or adjustable rockers -- Randall Horn, 09/06/2000
Adjustable pushrods aren't engine specific as they will work on any FE. If Crane doesn't have them don't be afraid to check with Comp Cams,Crower,Lunati,or Isky. I'm not sure if Ford motorsports still offers them or not.They should all measure the same length give or take a few thousandths of and inch. However as far as I know about any major cam manufacturer offers good pushrods for the FE. Also if they are available make sure the balls and cups on the rockers are welded and not just pressed units.

Randall Horn
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2640&Reply=2640><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>what carb is this???</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>gary, <i>09/04/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>it is a 2 bbl with "8A  BA"  stamped on the drivers side. the motor is a 66  390. also, it has a hose coming off the pcv going into the manifold in 2 places. inbetween is some sort of filter. it is silver with a scren in the bottom. what is it? thanks again. </blockquote> what carb is this??? -- gary, 09/04/2000
it is a 2 bbl with "8A BA" stamped on the drivers side. the motor is a 66 390. also, it has a hose coming off the pcv going into the manifold in 2 places. inbetween is some sort of filter. it is silver with a scren in the bottom. what is it? thanks again.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2644&Reply=2640><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: what carb is this???</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Ed Foral, <i>09/04/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Gary<br>Is there a metal tag on it?<br><br>Ed </blockquote> RE: what carb is this??? -- Ed Foral, 09/04/2000
Gary
Is there a metal tag on it?

Ed
 RE: what carb is this??? -- gary, 09/04/2000
ed, not that i can see.
 8ABA = C8AF-A = 68 Galaxie 390 4v, S/T & T/E [n/m] -- Mr F, 09/05/2000
n/m
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2636&Reply=2636><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Disc brakes</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>T1M, <i>09/04/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>I dont' want to fill up an engine-based message board with a post about disc brakes.  But I was curious if it would be more practical to refurbish an old disc brake assembly off another galaxie or full size ford and use it rather than buy a brand new disc conversion kit( very expensive) from an aftermarket company like Master Power Brakes ( mpbrakes.com). I have a 68' Galaxie with a 390 2-V.<br> Can someone give me advice or a url to a site that talks about disc brake conversions for 68' Galaxie in depth?<br>  Thanks </blockquote> Disc brakes -- T1M, 09/04/2000
I dont' want to fill up an engine-based message board with a post about disc brakes. But I was curious if it would be more practical to refurbish an old disc brake assembly off another galaxie or full size ford and use it rather than buy a brand new disc conversion kit( very expensive) from an aftermarket company like Master Power Brakes ( mpbrakes.com). I have a 68' Galaxie with a 390 2-V.
Can someone give me advice or a url to a site that talks about disc brake conversions for 68' Galaxie in depth?
Thanks
 Practicality's a subjective concept. I prefer to rebuild. [n/m] -- Mr F, 09/05/2000
n/m
 Cylinder Head Flow Data Needed -- scott, 09/04/2000
Does anyone here in Feforum land have any port flow data for any of the FE heads. Ive been Playing withone of these desk top Dyno programs and can get much more acurate results with some port flow data. My best friend has a 67 goat with a punched out 428 HO in and I want to ensure that I can pass him at will (with the a/c on. you know just because its a Merc) Friends dont let Friends drive Chevys. Besides i Like to tell him it looks almost as nice as a Fairlane! Would also be interested in anyones expirence with these Dyno Simulaters, so far all the engines that ive modeled have come very close to the factory ratings. Im using Dyno2000.Scott
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2634&Reply=2634><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>High Volume vs High Pressure</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>scott, <i>09/04/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Just sort of curious what you guys think of high volume vs high pressure. Im rebuilding a 428cj for my 67 scode xr7. I was planning to use the high volume pump. I also have a 390 2v in a 120000 mi wagon that im planning to put a high volume pump in-mainly because im not planning to putting bearings in lying on my back in the driveway. Also does anyone know did ford use a nylon timng gear in 67? the car does not burn or use any oil what so ever and is clean as a whistle inside. Im quessing that theres a nylon gear and the peices are plugging the pickup screen. And i can tell that the timings slipped a little again. Scott.  </blockquote> High Volume vs High Pressure -- scott, 09/04/2000
Just sort of curious what you guys think of high volume vs high pressure. Im rebuilding a 428cj for my 67 scode xr7. I was planning to use the high volume pump. I also have a 390 2v in a 120000 mi wagon that im planning to put a high volume pump in-mainly because im not planning to putting bearings in lying on my back in the driveway. Also does anyone know did ford use a nylon timng gear in 67? the car does not burn or use any oil what so ever and is clean as a whistle inside. Im quessing that theres a nylon gear and the peices are plugging the pickup screen. And i can tell that the timings slipped a little again. Scott.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2658&Reply=2634><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Nylon gear "skins" debuted by mid-'65 [n/m]</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Mr F, <i>09/05/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>n/m </blockquote> Nylon gear "skins" debuted by mid-'65 [n/m] -- Mr F, 09/05/2000
n/m
 RE: Nylon gear "skins" debuted by mid-'65 [n/m] -- gordon, 09/24/2000
i have a 62 390 block thats got 40,000 original miles on it that HAD the plastic cam gear teeth on it
gordon
 RE: High Volume vs High Pressure -- Tom H, 09/06/2000
I would plan to change the timing set anyway, just for piece of mind. It probably was changed before and there is a good chance there's teeth in the pan. Another thing you may find is pieces of valve seal, they get hard and crumble.
In an engine like yours I ususally use a high volume pump.
 RE: High Volume vs High Pressure -- Jim Raymond, 09/22/2000
Scott,

I believe the H/P pump has a tendency to overpressurize the "free plug" type caps at the end of the oil galleys, causing them to leak. The H/V pumps more oil, but doesn't have the h/p spring in the bypass. I've tested my 427 with the rocker arms pluged and the timing cover removed and it's amazing how much oil pumps past the cam brgs at the front of the block alone. If you don't put restricters in the rocker arms, even more is lost to the clearences there.
I believe you should restrict the heads and run the H/V pump to maxiumize the oil pressure to the mains.

Jim
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2631&Reply=2631><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Pure Stock Drags</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Don V, <i>09/04/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Factory Stock Drags in Ohio have come and gone, and the old dinosaur FE was the fastest Ford present. Sept 08 and 09, Stanton,MI will host the Pure Stock Muscle Car races.  Will this be a continuation of the past 4 yrs with the old reliable FE being the fastest Ford products that show up at this annual event ? Stay tuned.... </blockquote> Pure Stock Drags -- Don V, 09/04/2000
Factory Stock Drags in Ohio have come and gone, and the old dinosaur FE was the fastest Ford present. Sept 08 and 09, Stanton,MI will host the Pure Stock Muscle Car races. Will this be a continuation of the past 4 yrs with the old reliable FE being the fastest Ford products that show up at this annual event ? Stay tuned....
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2699&Reply=2631><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Here are the results....</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Don V, <i>09/10/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>The fastest Fords present at the Pure Stock Shoot Out on Sept 08 & 09 are as follows starting with the fastest.<br>1.1969 428 Cougar<br>2.1970 428 Mustang<br>3.1970 429 Torino<br>4.1971 429 Torino<br>5.1971 429 Torino<br>6.1966 390 Fairlane<br>7.1971 351 Torino<br><br>Out of 110 cars, only 7 Ford/Mercury products showed up - can anybody tell me why so many Ford/Mercury owners don't want to actually race their old muscle cars ? I mean if any old muscle car can take an occasional run down the strip with out breaking, it would be the old reliable Fords. </blockquote> Here are the results.... -- Don V, 09/10/2000
The fastest Fords present at the Pure Stock Shoot Out on Sept 08 & 09 are as follows starting with the fastest.
1.1969 428 Cougar
2.1970 428 Mustang
3.1970 429 Torino
4.1971 429 Torino
5.1971 429 Torino
6.1966 390 Fairlane
7.1971 351 Torino

Out of 110 cars, only 7 Ford/Mercury products showed up - can anybody tell me why so many Ford/Mercury owners don't want to actually race their old muscle cars ? I mean if any old muscle car can take an occasional run down the strip with out breaking, it would be the old reliable Fords.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2713&Reply=2631><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: Here are the results....</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>kevin, <i>09/12/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Good question! Let's get um out there people! </blockquote> RE: Here are the results.... -- kevin, 09/12/2000
Good question! Let's get um out there people!
 RE: Here are the results.... -- Skid Marc, 09/12/2000
I would love to get my 67 Galaxie to the strip. All my ride needs is about 2 years of work and $20 grand....
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2628&Reply=2628><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Sleeper Car with a 390?  :-]</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Dave King, <i>09/04/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Hi there, my name's Dave King, and I posted this on another FE board, but I'm curious to know what you guys think about it.<br>First, let me state that I'm only 18. I guess the reason I'm here is to inquire about a 390. But first, a little story. (all good things go with a story, right??)<br><br>My younger brother is into street racing. He'll take his '75 Torino Elite with a 351 Windsor and race kids from around the town, and sometimes he does good. But there's one thing nobody can touch in that town, and that's a brand-new Viper.<br><br>Well, I had heard lore from my uncle Ray, who once owned a 428 and the power it made. I also knew of an old 390 sitting in a Galaxie 500, and about a '64 Fairlane sitting in the same pasture as the Galaxie. Now, I've done a '48 Flathead to use in my '38 pickup, and that went pretty nice. I've also worked on 2.3L dirt track engines. OK, so I'm a newbie to engines, but I'd like to give that 390 a try. Question One: Would the 390 and the C-6 fit in a Fairlane engine compartment and tunnel to make a nice 'sleeper' car?  <br><br>My father has some old Motors truck manuals from the '70s, and in there they list truck engines... 390s. But, the earliest ones had 10.5:1 compression ratio, and the last ones had about 8.2:1, with a resultant less horsepower and torque. I'm kinda assuming this was for emissions reasons, and to cope with worse gas. Did truck FE motors differ any from passenger car motors in the way of block strength? (Probably not, but I really don't know.) And what did they do to it to decrease the compression ratio? Different heads with larger combustion chambers?<br><br>One last thing I noticed. Well, two things. First, I noticed that, oddly enough, this thing has rockershafts! Will those stock rockershafts, arms, and stands be able to stand hard-pressed 5500 RPMs? I'd like to put an Edelbrock Performer RPM manifold on it, or a triple-deuce setup if I could find one reasonable. Probably a wilder street cam, and new Mallory ignition (thought about a magneto, but heard they're a pain to start.). One last thing. Is there a mail-order company that has a good selection of FE parts? I know of Summit and Jegs, but they seem to worship the Chevy 350 god. <br><br>Thanks so much for any advice or input you guys could give me. This is going to be a long-while project, but I want to do lots of thinking before I start.<br><br>Much Appreciated,<br>Dave King<br>Foley, MN<br><br> </blockquote> Sleeper Car with a 390? :-] -- Dave King, 09/04/2000
Hi there, my name's Dave King, and I posted this on another FE board, but I'm curious to know what you guys think about it.
First, let me state that I'm only 18. I guess the reason I'm here is to inquire about a 390. But first, a little story. (all good things go with a story, right??)

My younger brother is into street racing. He'll take his '75 Torino Elite with a 351 Windsor and race kids from around the town, and sometimes he does good. But there's one thing nobody can touch in that town, and that's a brand-new Viper.

Well, I had heard lore from my uncle Ray, who once owned a 428 and the power it made. I also knew of an old 390 sitting in a Galaxie 500, and about a '64 Fairlane sitting in the same pasture as the Galaxie. Now, I've done a '48 Flathead to use in my '38 pickup, and that went pretty nice. I've also worked on 2.3L dirt track engines. OK, so I'm a newbie to engines, but I'd like to give that 390 a try. Question One: Would the 390 and the C-6 fit in a Fairlane engine compartment and tunnel to make a nice 'sleeper' car?

My father has some old Motors truck manuals from the '70s, and in there they list truck engines... 390s. But, the earliest ones had 10.5:1 compression ratio, and the last ones had about 8.2:1, with a resultant less horsepower and torque. I'm kinda assuming this was for emissions reasons, and to cope with worse gas. Did truck FE motors differ any from passenger car motors in the way of block strength? (Probably not, but I really don't know.) And what did they do to it to decrease the compression ratio? Different heads with larger combustion chambers?

One last thing I noticed. Well, two things. First, I noticed that, oddly enough, this thing has rockershafts! Will those stock rockershafts, arms, and stands be able to stand hard-pressed 5500 RPMs? I'd like to put an Edelbrock Performer RPM manifold on it, or a triple-deuce setup if I could find one reasonable. Probably a wilder street cam, and new Mallory ignition (thought about a magneto, but heard they're a pain to start.). One last thing. Is there a mail-order company that has a good selection of FE parts? I know of Summit and Jegs, but they seem to worship the Chevy 350 god.

Thanks so much for any advice or input you guys could give me. This is going to be a long-while project, but I want to do lots of thinking before I start.

Much Appreciated,
Dave King
Foley, MN

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2632&Reply=2628><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: Sleeper Car with a 390?  :-]</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Ed Foral, <i>09/04/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Dave<br>For starters, what car do you have  that you want to put an FE in?  If you look back in previous posts you will find a lot of conversations on 390 power and potential.<br><br>Ed </blockquote> RE: Sleeper Car with a 390? :-] -- Ed Foral, 09/04/2000
Dave
For starters, what car do you have that you want to put an FE in? If you look back in previous posts you will find a lot of conversations on 390 power and potential.

Ed
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2639&Reply=2628><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: Sleeper Car with a 390?  :-]</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Dave King, <i>09/04/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Well, I'd like to put it in a '64 Fairlane.  But, I was told that I'd have to cut a lot out, and that'd leave the front-end weak on the Fairlane.  (mainly shocks and stuff.)<br><br>Right now I don't have anything to stick it into; I'm just thinking and getting ideas.<br> </blockquote> RE: Sleeper Car with a 390? :-] -- Dave King, 09/04/2000
Well, I'd like to put it in a '64 Fairlane. But, I was told that I'd have to cut a lot out, and that'd leave the front-end weak on the Fairlane. (mainly shocks and stuff.)

Right now I don't have anything to stick it into; I'm just thinking and getting ideas.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2642&Reply=2628><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b> '64 Fairlane with a 390</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Ed Foral, <i>09/04/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Dave<br>Crites restoration sells a kit to chop the shocktowers and weld in a plate to make room for an FE or other engine larger than a 289.<br>As I mentioned before, check out the old posts in this and the general forum.<br><br>Ed  </blockquote>  '64 Fairlane with a 390 -- Ed Foral, 09/04/2000
Dave
Crites restoration sells a kit to chop the shocktowers and weld in a plate to make room for an FE or other engine larger than a 289.
As I mentioned before, check out the old posts in this and the general forum.

Ed
 RE: '64 Fairlane with a 390 -- Dave King, 09/05/2000
Okey Doke, thanks much!

Dave King

Go to the top of this page
Go back one page Back    Next Go forward one page

441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460