Skip Navigation Links.
 | What is the deck height on 360/390? -- Charles, 07/03/2001
I am building a 390 engine for my truck from the late-'60's car 360 that is in it. There is a dizzying array of pistons available... I want to preserve the "squish" so the piston top should be as close to zero deck as possible, and run about 8:1 CR. I was considering the $10 Sterling cast pistons but they seem to be over .100" in the hole which will not squish. I have sets of both 360 rods and 390 rods. Don't know my head volume (still in the truck :)
Anyway, can you tell me the deck height on my block (the distance from the crank centerline to the cylinder head mating surface)? Any advice welcome. Thanks! |
|  | 10.17" but it's always best to measure -- Walker, 07/03/2001
nm |
| |  | RE: 10.17" but it's always best to measure -- Dave Shoe, 07/03/2001
I believe the later truck FEs (1972ish and later?) may have gotten the deck cut a bit and used shorter pushrods to compensate. I'm not sure right now.
Shoe. |
|  | So what combo works best on 87 octane? -- Charles, 07/04/2001
So if the deck is 10.170, stroke is 3.786", rod is 6.488" (stock 390 values), that's zero-deck at 1.789" comp ht. If I use the 360 rod (6.540) then zero-deck is 1.737". PIstons I can find are 1.660, 1.740, 1.760, 1.776.
Seems like the Sterling low-comp truck piston (1.660) would be a long ways down the bore (0.129 or 0.077) and although this would lower the CR, it wouldn't help detonation resistance without the squish.
KB-Silvolite has a 391 piston with a ~30cc dish for a nice low CR and a 1.740 comp ht. This'd be +0.003 (above deck) without machining. Seems like a .040 thick head gasket would still give enough head-to-piston clearance in a low rpm truck engine. Thoughts?
|
 | Correct modern plugs for 428CJ -- Gary T, 07/03/2001
Can someone provide the correct modern plug number(autolite or other wise) for my 70 Shelby? Using Autolite 45's, which is running too hot(white tip). Have been told via the internet the next cooler plug is an Autolite 33. Autolite says they don't have a colder plug than the 45. Running a fairly stock motor with a pertronics. All help would be much appreciated. |
|  | RE: Correct modern plugs for 428CJ -- Scott Hollenbeck, 07/05/2001
45s are the modern replacement. Are you sure you're not running lean? |
|  | RE: Correct modern plugs for 428CJ -- Richard Swart, 07/08/2001
I just pulled some plugs out of a 69 ford van that be longs to a freand they looked like the old BF- 32 that where like new. I just looked they are Autolite-124. I my be wrong ,but I heard that besides motercraft ford still makes autolite.....But that company that make junk oil filters, fram, makes autolite too and that is what most auto part stores sell. I have all so found that menny a times certan stores will be out of fram-autolite- 45s and have to order them from there whairhouse and seance there is little demand for a colder plug they are not lested in most auto parts cataloge. So a yung buck couter person will till you they don't exest. |
| |  | RE: Correct modern plugs for 428CJ -- Greg B, 07/09/2001
Its more than 20yrs now. When the Feds forced Ford to divest of Autolite, the Spark Plug Division was sold to Fram/Bendix. Under the agreement at that time Autolite /Fram would continue to supply the plugs to Ford(read forever). They are made in the same plant on the same machines, they are identical plugs except for the label. The problem with the numbering also started around that time. The plug manufacturers went to a copper core plug configuation. This allowed the plug to operate over a broader heat range. This allowed them to discontinue many plug numbers due to the now overlapping heat ranges. The BF32 was one of many that were lost because of this The current Motorcraft BF42/Autolite 45 is the replacement for the lost BF32 As to JUNK OIL FILTER after 30yrs in the business I have never seen ONE filter related failure from a FRAM OIL FILTER Thats more than I can say for some of the other highly thought of filters |
|  | RE: Correct modern plugs for 428CJ -- Skip C., 07/10/2001
Replaced the plugs the on the car when I bought it with Autolite 45s ('66 T-Bird) and doubled the amount of spark knock. Replaced them with Autolite 32s and the knock returned to previous level or lower. Can't eliminate knock with plugs alone, compression is too high for today's gas. According to an old Autolite book, the 45s are hotter than the 42s. The second digit is the heat range. I have no idea what the first digit is for. Shoe, do you know ? Skip |
 | 428 with Longer Rods -- david kiser, 07/03/2001
I'm considering using the longer 360 type conn rods in my 428 and fly-cutting the top of stock type 428 cast pistons to get to zero deck height. This is a cheap way for me to get increased compression as I can get the pistons modified for nothing and already have the longer rods. I'd use new rod bolts and have the bottom end balanced. I've got the 6006 Edelbrock Al. heads and cam lift is less than .600"(hydraulic). Intake is Performer RPM with 850 dp Holley. OEM type adj. Rockers with Chrome Moly pushrods. Motor will be street driven and kept to 5500-6000 rpm. I'd appreciate any comments/suggestions on this Rod/piston combination. THanks in advance, David |
|  | RE: 428 with Longer Rods -- PI/CJ, 07/03/2001
The 360 rods will not be heavy enough so do not do it. Eagle rods can be bought for approx 600.00. So a better way would be to deck the block for cost of approx 100.00. The deck height should now be less than .020 |
|  | RE: 428 with Longer Rods -- Rusty, 07/07/2001
I agree w/ PI/CJ that decking the block is a better option. You could also take some off the heads. I don't think I'd try to mill 0.050 off of the stock cast pistons. I would also recommend the Eagle rods. I've been using them for several years and feel they are the best insurance you can buy for an F.E. engine. I've seen countless race engines blow up with stock rods. Just my 2 cents. Rusty |
 | 390 running hot..typical? -- bill, 07/02/2001
HI. My 69 390 runs 197 F on 95 deg days, and when I shut it off, it boils over into the burp bottle. Should the engine run this hot ? |
|  | RE: 390 running hot..typical? -- Boidman of Atl, 07/02/2001
UNfortunately,this is the one area where ford came up short in designing the FE series engines.All 352-428 built from 1958-1976 are prone to this kind of tantrum since they didnt design the cooling system well enough to handel all that cast iron.In your case and mine (62 390 in a boid) 600 pounds worth of cast iron.The intake seems to weigh 100 lbs by itself.In trying to solve your problem,flush all the coolant passages including removing the block drain if possible.make sure the thermostat is opening and closing properly.check to see if the fan clutch is working and that you have a fan shroud to help channel the air through the radiator properly.Also,check your timing to see if it is accurate,if its to high,that will cause overheating and a blown head gasket.Look to possibly upgrade your fan to a flex-a-light fan,a four row radiator(aluminium if possible) edlebrock or wieand water pump(they reportedly out do stock by 100%) and also a high volume oil pump as well.I hope this has shed some light on your situation.As a relative new comer to tinkering with old fords and submiting post here,i too am getting some great tips on how to keep FE engines happy. |
| |  | RE: 390 running hot..typical? -- Jeremy Faulds, 07/03/2001
While this is all good knowledge, I would advise against installing a high performance water pump as they can move too much coolant for their own good. Unless you're running this 390 hard all the time, you may find that a water pump with higher volume than stock will push the coolant through the cooling system too fast to absorbe the heat from the block or spend enough time in the radiator (regardless of # of cores) to desipate the heat. A new stock water pump should move enough coolant for daily driving. |
|  | RE: 390 running hot..typical? -- PI/CJ, 07/03/2001
Bill, this is a simple one if running only 195deg. simply drain out some water as too full. You want the water level when cold to be just to top of fins in rad no more this will cure your problem. What happens is expansion of the water if the system is too full it pushes out more than proper amt making you keep adding more water/anti freeze. Look for some RedLine water wetter this helps the FE's a bunch also. The water level will cure your problem though |
| |  | RE: 390 running hot..typical? -- bill in Illinois, 07/03/2001
I recently had the engine fully rebuilt and bored over .030, but essentially stock. I added a new 4 core radiator, running a 180 thermostat, new standard waterpump, good fan shroud, good 5 blade fan, correct 50/50 mix and one 16 oz can of watter wetter. The darn thing runs hot in traffic and always spits into the overflow after shutting down. I have A/C and it's hooked up to the compressor, but I haven't run it yet. Maybe airflow is somewhat restricted by the condenser for the A/C. The fins in it are fine. I'll let out some coolant like was suggested. |
|  | RE: 390 running hot..typical? -- Bob Enright, 07/04/2001
Make sure you don't fill the radiator all the way! I keep mine with just a little coolant over the coils. Leave the rest as air space. Your motor will run cooler & wont boil over after ya shut it off. I also added a bottle of redline water weter. |
| |  | RE: 390 running hot..typical? -- Bud Cubberley, 07/04/2001
Have been reading these threads with interest since I have a "running hot" problem with my 69 Mach1 with 428CJ. First, what is Redline water wetter? Sounds like a surfactant? Is it supposed to help the heat transfer within the block? Any particular parts store chain that carries this?
My 428 will run 195 or so all day as long as I don't stop at lights. Then it creeps up but never really seems to cool off. Have had it go to 230 but once I got moving again it did go to 200 OK. I am running a flex fan while I have the fan clutch rebuilt. Then I will reinstall the original fan. New 4 row radiator, more fins/inch and larger tubes. No coolant leaks or water in oil so engine seems OK. Any thoughts. My radiator guy feels pretty strongly that the stock fan with the larger diameter and greater blade pitch as well as a working fan clutch should take care of the problem.
Seems like there is not enough free area under the hood and around the block to let the fan push the hot air out of the engine compartment without the added pressure of going 40 miles per hour.
Shoe, what's your take. Have heard other people say the 428's run hot (define a temperature). How do you deal with the stop and go traffic thing? Here in the northeast you can't go too far without stopping at light and depending upon the day etc, the traffic could be a real bear. I'd rather not have to find out at what temperature the radiator really boils over at.
Thanks, Bud |
| | |  | RE: 390 running hot..typical? -- Kyle, 08/02/2001
Bud,
I, too, had a too-hot 428CJ Mach I, but I corrected it by installing a BeCool (located in Michigan) oversized aluminum radiator and two high-torque electric fans in front of the radiator to push air. I also have a flex-type plasic fan on the engine.
I have only the origianl "C-H" temp. gauge, but the needle barely gets past the "C" at highway speeds and about one-third while stopped in summer temps. (The needle does jump near the "H" after shutting down the car, but always cools down quickly once started.) Note: I have a factory oil cooler as well. I am unsure what the temp. would be without it.
The BeCool does require some modifications to fit in the car -- relocating the battery to the trunk and removing the windshield washer tank. Also, one word of caution -- The BeCool was supposedly designed for the Mustang, but I had to also make a few modifications to the sub-frame to lower it one inch to fit under the hood (it was one inch too high). The radiator costs approx. $600. BeCool also seels a full shroud/dual-fan kit for approx $500. I installed my own fans for less and am not using a shroud.
If you contact BeCool, ask for Mitch.
Kyle |
| |  | RE: 390 running hot..typical? -- Bob Enright, 07/04/2001
Water weter is made by red line. Yes it helps transfer heat. These engines need all the help they can get. I am running a std. bore 69 428CJ in my 67GT. The 390 ran the same way. If I put too much coolant in the rad. it would run hot & boil over as soon as I shut it off. |
|  | RE: Water wetter! -- RC Moser, 07/06/2001
I just flushed and replaced the coolant in my 97. I too have heard of this water wetter stuff. I found it a pep boys. I noted the temperature before I drained and flush. put in the water wetter with the new antifreeze. Yes, this stuff did lower the temperature as noted on the temp. gauge after the engine was warmed up to operating temperature. Say's it will lower engine temperture by 20 degrees. Made a believer out of me. |
 | please help rewireing probs -- gerald, 07/01/2001
i put the dash wireing in and i cant get fire to headlights ,dashlights. it will start now and run tryed headlight switch not it .so i give can someone please help any ideas are verry appreciated by the way this is a 65 fastback mustang it has 62 406 try power a 64 econo van straight axle dropped 2 inchs ths dash is stock |
|  | RE: get out the old multimeter and start checking -- RC Moser, 07/01/2001
Gerald, I'd first check the grounds and then using a multimeter start tracing the wires for voltage starting at the ignition switch. Most likely it probably a ground wire disconnected. Without the ad of a multimeter or home made 12V bulb with two wires on it (one end goes to the wire and the other to ground if the light lights you have 12Vs) to test of voltage you are hunting a needle in a hay stack. Why did you remove the old harness? |
| |  | RE: get out the old multimeter and start checking -- gerald, 07/02/2001
thanks i'll try that . i did not change it for i did not know it was bad . i just thought bad headlight switch |
| | |  | RE: get out the old multimeter and start checking -- John, 07/04/2001
Yes, RC Moser is right when he says about grounds. That is the #1 problem with any electrical fault, being it automotive or home electronic. Just a word of caution though about the use of a multimeter...use an analog one(with a needle type meter movement) not a digital one.....the digitial ones are high impedance and can give you voltages where there is enough current to have the meter show 12 volts, but a bad enough connection that there is not enough current available to drive a meter-type movement voltmeter,...or...of course...light the lights. The utility 12 volt light bulb idea is a good one. Get a wiring diagram if you can, but even without one, you should be able to figure it out. Try the headlight connector voltages with respect to chassis ground vs the headlight connetcor ground. If you have voltage that way, then it is a bad ground. If you don't.....back-up the circuit. Check voltage to chassis ground at your switch. If you have voltage there, but not at your headlights, you have a bad connection..probably in your wiring harness connectors.....look for green corrosion inside the connectors. A little Dupont M-3 or equivalent metal prep (just acid) will clean them up fine...then use WD-40 or oil or grease to keep them from corroding again. All oils are an insulator, but if the metal to metal contact if tight, the oil will be displaced to keep a connection, but yet hold back the corrosion. Wish I was there to help, but try it yourself...it's really not that hard. One further word of advice...if you use the ohmeter function of your meter to check continuity of a wire, make sure the battery is completely disconnected! If not, you could burn up your meter. |
 | '67 410 cid pistons -- BOYD, 06/30/2001
Decided to rebuild a 410 cid. The trouble is findig forged pistons at a reasonable price. I was told by one person that cast pistons would be okay as long as I wasn't going to be going over 6000 RPM's. I would like to build this motor as well as possible without going to the poorhouse. Any suggestions? |
 | 406 Pistons? -- John Saxon, 06/29/2001
Ihave a set of what I believe are 406 pistons, the tops are marked L2198 which I think is a TRW #.Does anyone know for sure if they are TRW and what the application is,and whether they are forged.Any information would be appreciated. |
|  | Oops -- John Saxon, 06/30/2001
My eyesight must be getting bad.The number on the pistons is L2188. |
 | Unbalanced 5.0L 302. -- carlton taylor, 06/29/2001
I recently dropped a re-built SBF 5.0L 302 with 351 Windsor heads into my '65 Mustang. The motor was internally balanced and shipped with a (Ford) four-bolt harmonic balancer (E4TE-A3A) sans a flex plate.
My installer wanted to retain the existing front dress pulleys from the existing 289. So he swapped the balancer with a three-bolt damper (part #FMCC5AZ6316B) and a Ford flex plate (part #FMCC3AZ6375L) both of which I believe are 28.2-oz.
Needless to say, the motor has this annoying "humming" vibration.
What I'm wondering is could the motor be unbalanced because the installer exchanged the balancers? I read somewhere the 5.0L 302's are equipped with a 50-oz damper. I'm sure the installer bolted on a 28.2-oz damper and flex plate? (The damper was smaller then the one removed from the 5.0L). Is there a 50-oz three hole damper? And lastly, if the motor was internally balanced wouldn't the damper be completely neutral (zero) balanced?
Any advice you can give me would be more than greatly appreciated.
Thanks,CT
|
|  | RE: Unbalanced 5.0L 302. -- mark, 07/01/2001
You're right - the 302's have the 50 oz balance factor. got to have the right damper & flywheel. |
 | FE 428......Won't crank over when "hot" -- Steve Boulay, 06/29/2001
I have a brand new battery, brand new(rebuilt) starter, and am about to replace all the battery cables... I won't crank after it has been driven and left to sit for 15-20 minutes. After it cools down it's o.k. Do I have a "typically" bad rebuilt starter, or am I missing something else? Will I need to got to the High torque mini-starter, or is there another solution?? Suggestions will be appreciated. thanx, SGB |
|  | RE: FE 428......Won't crank over when "hot" -- Travis Miller, 06/29/2001
Fords with the starter solenoid on the fender are bad about corroding the inside of the cable that goes from the solenoid to the starter. While it may still look good, sometimes it is the culprit. |
|  | RE: FE 428......Won't crank over when "hot" -- BOB HOPKINS, 06/29/2001
Are you saying it won't turn over at all or just turns too slow to start,Do you have a good voltmeter and a anp meter to check current flow to starter? You need to find voltage at starter when cranking cold and under hot and how much current the starter drags,also what are you trying to start lots of difference in current requirement in a low compression loose stocker and a tight 12-13-1race engine. |
| |  | RE: FE 428......Won't crank over when "hot" -- John, 06/29/2001
Probably not related, but I had a similiar problem for a strange reason. The rebuilt starter frame was painted so the ground for the throw-out winding didn't always have a good ground...starter would spin, but not fly out and crank engine. I drilled out the rivet, tapped it for a 10-32 I think, and installed a SS machine screw...no more problems.
Also, I have always found my 428 to crank over slowly when hot. I just figured the increase in compression (oil thrown up from just being run) and the tightness of the engine once hot(parts expand) was the culprit and I am told this is normal. However no damage was ever caused by this. An aftermarket "geared-down" starter should prove to cure the problem.
Finally, battery cables must be in top condition at both ends...pay particular attention to the ground which may hace a grundgy bolt on a painted surface of the block or head. This can change resistance when hot. Continuity between the engine block and the bell-housing is important, but I have never seen this to be a problem.
Just a few things to ponder. |
|  | RE: Steve need more information? -- RC Moser, 06/30/2001
Need alot more information: like was the engine just rebuilt or did the problem start out of the blue. What type of ingition system (if points whats the gap and timing set at) make sure you have a good clean ground connection and you cable running to the starter is as far away from the exhaust as possible. Maybe it's one of the battery cables, but if not supply more information and you'll get more responses |
| |  | RE: Steve need more information? -- richard, 06/30/2001
if you ultimately determine the starter is your problem, get one from mean green industries in pa. they have a gear drive starter that may just outlast your vehicle. i know it works cause i got one a few years ago for my old F-250 diesel. never had another starter problem, hot od cold. |
|  | RE: FE 428......Won't crank over when "hot" -- Richard, 07/02/2001
This is typical of the FE's with the starter hot lead very close to the exhaust. Usually on a 427... there is actually a different starter for the 427 to solve this thermal problem. Are you running the cast iron headers on your 428? See Greg Donahue's writeup on this for details as to |
| |  | RE: FE 428......Won't crank over when "hot" -- PI/CJ, 07/03/2001
Dont bother with greg donohou he is just a dreamer Make sure you have a good engine to chassis ground. Most likely the ground is the problem. |
| | |  | RE: FE 428......Won't crank over when "hot" -- Richard, 07/03/2001
I don't know what you have against Greg Donahue, but he is not the originator of the starter thermal problem/assessment anyway. Just a place to read more about it. Cartesian logic forbids ad hominem argument for very good reasons. The problem is thermal so suggesting nothing more than checking the integrity of the return path isn't very insightful. |
 | C-6 tranny rebuild -- bear, 06/28/2001
I just wanted to follow up on the post I put out about my tranny eating up clutch disk in high. I tweaked the line pressure and everything is running great. It churps second and third gear now. So thanks everyone for there suggestions. |
|  | RE: C-6 tranny rebuild -- BOB HOPKINS, 06/28/2001
so how did you tweak the line pressure?? |
| |  | RE: C-6 tranny rebuild -- bear, 06/28/2001
The module needed screwed in a little more. And installed a TCI manual valve body. |
|